Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Frequent fire protects shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) from introgression by loblolly pine (P. taeda)

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Across much of the globe, fire is a major disturbance agent of forest and grassland communities. The removal of fire from previously fire-maintained ecosystems, which has occurred in many areas, changes species composition, favoring later less fire tolerant species over fire-adapted ones. A recent measured increase in the rate of hybridization between the fire-adapted shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) and less fire-adapted loblolly pine (P. taeda) suggests that introgression may be an emerging threat to shortleaf pine as a genetically distinct species. We used 25 microsatellite markers on seedlings and saplings to test how the use of frequent fire affects the survival of hybrids between the two species by contrasting species makeup and hybridity in regularly burned areas (every 2 years) to that in neighboring unburned areas, both with mixed canopies of loblolly pine, shortleaf pine, and hybrids. The results show that frequent prescribed fire selects against loblolly pine and hybrids, restoring the community to one dominated by shortleaf pine. These results are the first to indicate that frequent fire can resist introgression between two co-occurring native species and that fire exclusion as a land management policy may be having unrecognized deleterious effects on the genetic integrity of species previously isolated from one another based on fire tolerance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Spruell P, Wenburg JK (2001) The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol Evol 16:613–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batek MJ, Rebertus AJ, Schroeder WA, Haithcoat TL, Compas E, Guyette RP (1999) Reconstruction of early nineteenth century vegetation and fire regimes in the Missouri Ozarks. J Biogeogr 26:397–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain MD, Shelton MG (2002) Does prescribed burning have a place in regenerating uneven-aged loblolly-shortleaf pine stands? South J Appl For 26:117–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey DC, Hartman G (2005) Returning fire to Ozark Highland forest ecosystems: effects on advance regeneration. For Ecol Manag 217:37–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyette RP, Spetich MA, Stambaugh MC (2006) Historic fire regime dynamics and forcing factors in the Boston Mountains, Arkansas. For Ecol Manag 234:293–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyette RP, Muzika R, Voelker SL (2007) The historical ecology of fire, climate, and the decline of shortleaf pine in the Missouri Ozarks. In: Kabrick, JM, Dey DC, Gwaze D (ed) Shortleaf pine restoration and ecology in the Ozarks. Proceedings of a symposium, USDA, forest service general technical report NRS-P-15. Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, pp 8–18

  • Mattoon WR (1915) Life history of shortleaf pine. USDA Bulletin 244, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr C (1897) The timber pines of the Southern United States. USDA Division of Forestry Bulletin 13, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reid AM, Robertson KM, Hmielowski TL (2012) Predicting litter and live herb fuel consumption during prescribed fires in native and old-field upland pine communities of the southeastern United States. Can J For Res 42:1611–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtling R (2007) Genetic variation in the southern pines: evolution, migration, and adaptation following the Pleistocene. In: Kabrick JM, Dey DC, and Gwaze D (eds). General technical report NRS-P-15. Forest Service, Springfield, pp 28–32

  • South DB, Buckner ER (2003) The decline of southern yellow pine timberland. J For 101:30–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JF, Tauer CG, Nelson CD (2012) Bidirectional introgression between loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and shortleaf pine (P. echinata Mill.) has increased since the 1950s. Tree Genet Genomes 8:725–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tauer CG, Stewart JF, Will RE, Lilly CJ, Guldin JM, Nelson CD (2012) Hybridization leads to loss of genetic integrity in shortleaf pine: unexpected consequences of pine management and fire suppression. J For 110:216–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wagtendock JW (2007) The history and evolution of wildland fire use. Fire Ecol Spec Issue 3:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Will RE, Lilly CJ, Stewart JF, Huff S, Tauer CG (2013) Recovery from top kill of shortleaf pine × loblolly pine hybrids compared to their parent populations. Trees 27:1167–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams RA (1998) Effects of fire on shortleaf and loblolly pine reproduction and its potential use in shortleaf/oak/hickory ecosystem restoration. In: Waldrop TA (ed). Proceedings of the seventh biennial southern silviculture research conference. Forest Service. General technical report SRS-20, pp 321–325

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Professor Emeritus C. G. Tauer for initiating this line of research and igniting interest in the importance of shortleaf pine as a species at risk. We thank J. Bradley for assisting in sampling, as well as Professor S. Hallgren for providing laboratory space. This project was funded by the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Cooperative Agreement 12-CA-11330126-014 and McIntire-Stennis project OKL0 2665.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodney E. Will.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stewart, J.F., Will, R.E., Robertson, K.M. et al. Frequent fire protects shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) from introgression by loblolly pine (P. taeda). Conserv Genet 16, 491–495 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-014-0669-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-014-0669-x

Keywords

Navigation