Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hotspots of diversity of wild Australian soybean relatives and their conservation in situ

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mapping diversity hotspots of key species, such as the crop wild relatives, is an essential task for their conservation and for their further exploration. In this paper, we develop and apply methods to locate centres of species richness (SR), endemism, phylogenetic diversity and phylogenetic endemism (PE) for the Australian perennial diploid species of Glycine (Fabaceae). The study taxa are congeneric with the cultivated soybean Glycine max. The DNA sequence data for the phylogenetic analysis are histone H3D gene sequences for these Glycine species. The highest 2.5 % grid cell scores of diversity were defined as the Glycine diversity “hotspots”. The hotspots for the four types of diversity are located in the Kimberley district Western Australia, the Wet Tropics and south-eastern Queensland. The observed frequency distribution of SR values were compared with a theoretical distribution that assumed a species-specific but geographically constant probability for the occurrence of each individual species. The comparison showed broad trends of geographic dispersion overlaying localised high diversity. Simulations of endemism scores supported these themes. No grid cell scored highly for all four diversity metrics, as each index captured specific types of diversity. The inclusion of phylogenetic data pinpointed new areas of biodiversity that were less obvious from other metrics. The Kimberley district emerged as a crucial centre of Glycine diversity with two related lineages of narrowly endemic species. Overall, ~16 % of the endemism centres, and 24 % of the PE centres are conserved in situ in protected areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown AHD, Brubaker CL (2002) Indicators for sustainable management of plant genetic resources: how well are we doing? In: Brown AHD, Jackson MT, Engels JJM, Ramanatha Rao V (eds) Managing plant genetic diversity. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 249–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown AHD, Burdon JJ (1983) Multilocus diversity in an outbreeding weed, Echium plantagineum L. Aust J Biol Sci 36:503–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown AHD, Burdon JJ, Grace JP (1990) Genetic structure of Glycine canescens, a perennial relative of soybean. Theor Appl Genet 79:729–736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown AHD, Doyle JL, Grace JP, Doyle JJ (2002) Molecular phylogenetic relationships within and among diploid races of Glycine tomentella (Leguminosae). Aust Syst Bot 15:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CAPAD (2008) The collaborative Australian protected areas database. Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPaC), Canberra, Australia

  • Coates DJ, Atkins KA (2001) Priority setting and the conservation of Western Australia’s diverse and highly endemic flora. Biol Conserv 97:251–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp MD, Laffan SW, Linder P, Monro A (2001) Endemism in the Australian flora. J Biogeogr 28:183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Egan AN (2010) Dating the origins of polyploidy events. New Phytol 186:73–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle MJ, Grant JE, Brown AHD (1986) Reproductive isolation between isozyme groups of Glycine tomentella (Leguminosae), and spontaneous doubling in their hybrids. Aust J Bot 34:523–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL, Brown AHD (1999) Incongruence in the diploid B-genome species complex of Glycine (Leguminosae) revisited: histone H3D alleles vs. chloroplast haplotypes. Mol Biol Evol 16:354–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL, Brown AHD, Pfeil BF (2000) Confirmation of shared and divergent genomes in the Glycine tabacina polyploidy complex (Leguminosae) using histone H3D sequences. Syst Bot 25:437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL, Brown AHD, Palmer RG (2002) Genomes, multiple origins, and lineage recombination in the Glycine tomentella (Leguminosae) polyploidy complex: jistone H3-D gene sequences. Evolution 56:1388–1402

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL, Rauscher JT, Brown AHD (2004) Evolution of the perennial soybean polyploidy complex (Glycine subgenus Glycine): a study of contrasts. Biol J Linn Soc 82:583–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faith DP (1992) Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol Conserv 61:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faith DP, Reid CAM, Hunter J (2004) Integrating phylogenetic diversity, complementarity, and endemism for conservation assessment. Conserv Biol 18:255–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Orozco CE, Laffan SW, Miller JT (2011) Spatial distribution of species richness and endemism of the genus Acacia in Australia. Aust J Bot 59:600–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymowitz T, Singh RJ, Kollipara KP (1998) The genomes of Glycine. Plant Breed Rev 16:289–317

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IBRA Version 6.1 (2004) Interim biogeographic regionalisation for Australia. ERIN, Geoscience Australia

  • Jarvis A, Lane A, Hijmans RJ (2008) The effect of climate change on crop wild relatives. Agric Ecosyst Environ 126:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollipara KP, Singh RJ, Hymowitz T (1997) Phylogenetic and genomic relationships in the genus Glycine Willd. based on sequences from the ITS region of nuclear rDNA. Genome 40:57–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft NJB, Baldwin BG, Ackerly DD (2010) Range size, taxon age and hotspots of neoendemism in the California flora. Divers Distrib 16:403–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffan SW, Crisp MD (2003) Assessing endemism at multiple spatial scales, with an example from the Australian vascular flora. J Biogeogr 30:511–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffan SW, Lubarsky E, Rosauer DF (2010) Biodiverse, a tool for the spatial analysis of biological and related diversity. Ecography 33:643–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray BR, Brown AHD, Grace JP (2003) Geographic gradients in seed size among and within perennial Australian Glycine species. Aust J Bot 51:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray BR, Brown AHD, Dickman CR, Crowther MS (2004) Geographical gradients in seed mass in relation to climate. J Biogeogr 31:379–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N (1989) Threatened biotas: “Hotspots” in tropical forests. Environmentalist 8:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Orme CD, Davies RG, Burgess M et al (2005) Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 436:1016–1019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeil BE, Tindale MD, Craven LA (2001) A review of the Glycine clandestina species complex (Leguminosae: phaseolae) reveals two new species. Aust Syst Bot 14:891–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeil BE, Craven LA, Brown AHD, Murray BG, Doyle JJ (2006) Three new species of northern Australian Glycine (Fabaceae, Phaseolae), G. gracei, G. montis-douglas and G. syndetika. Aust Syst Bot 19:245–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinforma 14:817–818

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rauscher JT, Doyle JJ, Brown AHD (2004) Multiple origins and nrDNA internal transcribed spacer homeologue evolution in the Glycine tomentella (Leguminosae) allopolyploid complex. Genetics 166:987–998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Whittaker RJ (2010) Conservation biogeography: foundations, concepts and challenges. Divers Distrib 16:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinforma 19:1572–1574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosauer D, Laffan SW, Crisp MD, Donnellan SC, Cook LG (2009) Phylogenetic endemism: a new approach for identifying geographical concentrations of evolutionary history. Mol Ecol 18:4061–4072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Shawn Laffan and Dan Rosauer for helpful discussion of the Biodiverse software, Craig Richardson for access to the CAPAD 2008 protected areas spatial data and Chris Howard and Brent Mishler for comments on the manuscript. JJD’s Glycine research is currently supported by US National Science Foundation IOS-0822258.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos E. González-Orozco.

Appendix: Testing the distribution of SR values

Appendix: Testing the distribution of SR values

The presence versus the absence of a particular Glycine taxon in a grid cell is analogous to the zygosity status (heterozygous vs. homozygous) of a particular genetic locus in an individual. The frequency distribution of the number of cells with a particular value of SR is then analogous to that of the number of individuals with a given number of heterozygous loci. The hypothesis of independent occurrence of species among grid cells (and hence the absence of diversity hot-spots, or indeed the lack of regional divergence) is analogous to the hypothesis of independence of heterozygosity for loci (and hence the lack of multilocus structure). The distribution of multilocus heterozygosity and its sampling behaviour has been formulated for the case of independent heterozygosity and applied to genes in plant populations (Brown and Burdon 1983).

Let H j denote the observed proportion of grid cells in which the jth species of Glycine is present and 1 − H j the proportion it is absent. The complement of Glycine species or SR for each grid cell is determined and summarized as the observed distribution of the number (YK) of grid cells having a richness of (K = 1, 2, 3, … , 27) species. The total number of grid cells is N = Σ YK (=448 here). It is immediately clear that the analogy between species and genes has one problem in that no value for Y0, the number of cells with K = 0 is observable. To fit a random independent distribution, we must invoke an unknowable variable (Y0) to be this value. Assuming an estimate of this variable, it is possible to compute s 2 k the variance of this adjusted empirical distribution.

The theoretical distribution of richness assuming independence is obtained by convolution of the generating functions for the binomial distributions for the presence or absence of each single species (j = 1,2, … 27 here). The combined generation function is:

$$ G({\text{X}}) = \prod {\left[ {\left( {1 - H_{j} } \right) + \left( {H_{j} {\text{X}}} \right)} \right]} $$

The function {G(X)} is expanded numerically, multiplying over all 27 species, and the coefficient of the term X i in this expansion is the probability (P j ; j = 0, 1, 2, … , 27) that the number of species (richness) in a grid cell is i. In this case, we obtain an expected value for the ‘unobservable’ proportion (=P0) of grid cells with zero Glycine, and total number of grid cells in the model is adjusted to N + Y0. The H j are estimated from the observed frequency of each species, but with the total cells adjusted by the presumed value of Y0 (= N P0/[1 − P0]). However the estimates of {H j } are no longer appropriate and must be adjusted for the unobservable zero cells, and a new set of estimates of joint probabilities obtained. The iteration is repeated until the value of Y0 that gives the random model best fitting the observed richness distribution is obtained. This theoretical expected distribution under the null hypothesis of species independence is compared with the observed distribution with goodness-of-fit test and its variance calculated, or it can be calculated directly from the fitted {H j } values

$$ \sigma_{K} = \sum {H_{j} } - \sum {H_{j}^{2} } $$

The observed distribution of the 448 cells with at least one record of a Glycine species is given in the table below. Estimates of the theoretical distribution of SR assuming independence of species occurrence were then obtained from the observed frequency of cells where a given species occurs by the convolution of generating functions. Expected numbers were adjusted to give the same total of positive cells (488), and in the first iteration the model yielded an estimate of 117 cells without any Glycine (Y0). However the total Glycine species-grid cell occurrences in model 1 (810) exceeds the observed (641). Model 2 is a second iteration that used the species frequencies corrected for the hypothetical zero cells (117) yields a new estimate of Glycine-zero cells (187). By repeating this iterative procedure, the estimate of Y0 converged to 313 negative cells as yielding the best fitting random model (model 3 in Table 5) to the observed joint species frequencies.

Table 5 Observed and expected distribution of Glycine SR

The comparison of the observed with this model is instructive. The Chi-square goodness of fit of the four classes (conservatively 1, 2, 3 and >3 species) was 10.41, (P = 0.0055). The observed distribution has excess cells with the lowest (SR = 1) and higher (SR > 3) values, and deficiency in the intermediate (SR = 2, 3). The variance of the observed distribution was 0.836, higher than the theoretical value of 0.763. Increased variance arises from two causes, broad geographic divergence (e.g. dryland species like G. canescens, or temperate species like G. latrobeana occur in particular portions of the total range of the genus). At the other extreme, the occurrence of hot spots of SR also increases this variance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

González-Orozco, C.E., Brown, A.H.D., Knerr, N. et al. Hotspots of diversity of wild Australian soybean relatives and their conservation in situ. Conserv Genet 13, 1269–1281 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-012-0370-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-012-0370-x

Keywords

Navigation