Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conservation genetics of Butte County meadowfoam (Limnanthes floccosa ssp. californica Arroyo), an endangered vernal pool endemic

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The endangered annual plant Limnanthes floccosa ssp. californica Arroyo is restricted to vernal pools in Butte County, California. To identify populations with unique genetic resources, guide reintroduction efforts, and design seed collection scenarios for long-term ex situ seed storage we determined extant genetic diversity and structure by surveying 457 individuals from 21 distinct populations using nine polymorphic microsatellite markers. We found low within population genetic diversity: low allelic diversity (1.9 [0.06 SE] alleles/locus); low heterozygosity (H obs = 0.10 ± 0.018, H exp = 0.19 ± 0.015), and a high fixation index (0.556 ± 0.044). The number of polymorphic loci ranged between 11 and 89%. Bayesian ordination determined 20 distinct populations and we found high genetic structure among these (F st = 0.65, P < 0.0001). We identified notable gene flow barriers across populations, confirming regional structuring between three previously defined population density centers and two outlying populations (F st = 0.21, P < 0.0001). Population size estimates ranged between ~50 and >5,000 extant plants per site. Our study confirms previous isozyme-based results and suggests that the loss of any population would represent a significant loss in the species’ genetic diversity. Recovery requires active restoration of existing populations and permanent habitat protection. We recommend close comparison of microhabitats of declining populations with genetically similar populations, to determine the potential for human assisted gene flow via seed movement to recover declining populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arroyo M (1973) A taximetric study of infraspecific variation in autogamous Limnanthes floccosa (Limnanthaceae). Brittonia 25:177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo M (1975) Electrophoretic studies of genetic variation in natural populations of allogamous Limnanthes alba and autogamous Limnanthes floccosa (Limnanthaceae). Heredity 35:153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awadalla P, Ritland K (1997) Microsatellite variation and evolution in the Mimulus guttatus species complex with contrasting mating system. Mol Ecol Evol 14:1023–1034

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres D, Sloop C (2008) Genetic structure of three endangered plants of the Santa Rosa Plain: Burke’s goldfields (Lasthenia burkei) Sonoma sunshine (Blennosperma bakeri) and Sebastopol meadowfoam (Limnanthes vinculans). Final Report. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. http://www.lagunafoundation.org/knowledgebase/?q=node/191. Accessed 3 Jan 2009

  • Barrett S, Kohn J (1991) Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. In: Falk D (ed) Conservation of rare plants: biology and genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • California Natural Diversity Data Base (2005) California Department of Fish and Game. http://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cnddb/. Accessed 17 Dec 2008

  • City of Chico (1990) Addendum to a draft plan for the conservation of Butte County meadowfoam in the city of Chico. Community Services Department, Chico, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornuet JM, Piry S, Luikart G, Estoup A, Solignac M (1999) New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics 153:1989–2000

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis H (1998) Allele effects in Blennosperma bakeri. Thesis, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA

  • Dole J, Sun M (1992) Field and genetic survey of the endangered Butte County meadowfoam—Limnanthes floccosa ssp californica (Limnanthaceae). Cons Biol 6:549–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elam D (1998) Population genetics of vernal pool plants: theory data and conservation implications. In: Witham CW, Bauder ET, Belk D, Ferren WR, Ornduff R (eds) Ecology, conservation and management of vernal pool ecosystems—Proceedings from a 1996 Conference. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, USA pp 180–189

  • Estoup A, Garnery L, Solignac M, Cornuet JM (1995) Microsatellite variation in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) populations: hierarchical genetic structure and test of the infinite allele and stepwise mutation models. Genetics 140:679–695

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver 3.11: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1:47–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure: extensions to linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foin T, Reilly S, Pawley A, Ayres D, Carlson T, Hodem P, Switzer P (1998) Improving recovery planning for the conservation of threatened and endangered taxa. Bioscience 48:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R, Ballou J, Briscoe DA (2007) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Freville H, Justy F, Olivieri J (2001) Comparative allozyme and microsatellite populations structure in a narrow endemic plant species Centaurea sorymbosa Pourret (Asteraceae). Mol Ecol 10:879–889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma D (1986) Evolutionary biology. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin ME, Soulé ME (1986) Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. In: Soulé ME (ed) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp 19–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein DB, Schloetterer C (1999) Microsatellites–evolution and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb LD (1973) Enzyme differentiation and phylogeny in Clarkia franciscana, Clarkia rubicunda, and Clarkia amoena. Evolution 27:205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (version 12): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Heredity 86:485–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick JL, Godt MJW (1996) Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 351:1291–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harker N (2001) Collection reporting and storage of microsatellite genotype data. In: Henry RJ (ed) Plant genotyping: the DNA fingerprinting of plants. CABI Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauptli H, Webster BD, Jain S (1978) Variation in nutlet morphology of Limnanthes. Am J Bot 65:615–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickman JC (ed) (1993) The Jepson manual–higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland RF (1978) The geographic and edaphic distribution of vernal pools in the great Central Valley, California: California Native Plant Society special publication no. 4. California Native Plant Society, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland RF, Jain SK (1977) Vernal pools. In: Barbour MG, Major J (eds) Terrestrial vegetation of California. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp 515–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton T (2001) Plant genotyping by analysis of microsatellites. In: Henry R (ed) Plant genotyping: the DNA fingerprints of plants. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 15–27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jokerst JD (1989) A draft plan for the conservation of Butte County meadowfoam Limnanthes floccosa ssp californica in the City of Chico. Prepared for City of Chico Community Services Department, Chico, CA, Sacramento, CA

  • Karron JD (1987) A comparison of levels of genetic polymorphsim and self-compatibility in geographically restricted and widespread plant congeners. Evol Ecol 1:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeler-Wolf T, Elam DR, Lewis K, Flint SA (1998) California vernal pool assessment preliminary report. State of California. Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley and Associates (1994) Population survey of Butte County meadowfoam (Limnanthes floccosa ssp californica) Stonegate Project—1994 Bruce Road and Warfield Road, Chico Butte County, California. Environmental Sciences I, Unpublished report, Davis, California, USA

  • Kesseli RV, Jain SK (1984) New variation and biosystematic patters detected by allozyme and morphological comparisons in Limnanthes sect. Reflexae (Limnanthaceae). Plant Syst Evol 147:133–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesseli RV, Jain SK (1986) Breeding system and population structure in Limnanthes. Theor Appl Genet 71:292–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishore VK, Velasco P, Shintani DK, Rowe J, Rosato C, Adair N, Slabaugh MB, Knapp SJ (2004) Conserved simple sequence repeats for the Limnanthaceae (Brassicales). Theor Appl Genet 108:450–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1993) Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. Am Nat 142:911–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong JM (1994) Pollination of a patchily-distributed plant, Blennosperma nanum, in natural and artificially created vernal pool habitats. PhD dissertation, University of California, Davis

  • Manni F, Guérard E, Heyer E (2004) Geographic patterns of (genetic morphologic linguistic) variation: how barriers can be detected by “Monmonier’s algorithm”. Hum Biol 76:173–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mason C (1952) A systematic study of the genus Limnanthes. University of California Publications in Botany, Berkeley, CA, pp 455–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 106:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff R (1964) Biosystematic of Blennosperma (Compositae). Britonia 16:289–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piry SG, Luikart G, Cornuet JM (1999) Bottleneck: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. J Heredity 90:502–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piry S, Alapetite A, Cornuet JM, Paetkau D, Baudouin L, Estoup A (2004) GeneClass2: a software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. J Heredity 95:536–539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard JK, Wen W (2004) Documentation for Structure software: version 2 http://pritch.bsd.uchicago.edu/structure.html. Accessed 11 Oct 2010

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramp Neale JM, Ranker TA, Collinge SK (2008) Conservation of rare species with island-like distributions: a case study of Lasthenia conjugens (Asteraceae) using population genetic structure and the distribution of rare markers. Plant Spec Biol 23:97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP version 12: population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Heredity 86:248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Cons Biol 17:230–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritland K, Jain S (1981) A model for estimation of outcrossing rate and gene frequencies using n independent loci. Heredity 47:35–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M (1987) Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236:787–792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smouse PE, Long JC, Sokal RR (1986) Multiple regression and correlation extension of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Syst Zool 35:627–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR (1987) Introduction to biostatistics. WH Freeman & Co, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorp R (1990) Vernal pool flowers and host-specific bees. In: Ikeda D, Schlising R (eds) Vernal pool plants: their habitat and biology. California State University, Chico, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorp R, Leong J (1995) Native bee pollinators of vernal pool plants. Fremontia 23:3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorp R, Leong J (1998) Specialist bee pollinators of showy vernal pool flowers. In: Witham CW, Bauder ET, Belk D, Ferren Jr WR, Ornduff R (eds) Ecology, conservation and management of vernal pool ecosystems. Proceedings from a 1996 conference. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA pp 169–179

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (1992) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; determination of endangered status for the plant Limnanthes flocccosa ssp californica (Butte County meadowfoam) pp 24192–24199, Federal Register

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (2005) Recovery plan for vernal pool ecosystems of California and Southern Oregon. Portland, Oregon, pp 606. http://www.fws.gov/sacramento/es/recovery_plans/vp_recovery_plan_links.htm. Accessed 11 Oct 2010

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (2006) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: designation of critical habitat for four vernal pool crustaceans and eleven vernal pool plants; Final Rule 50 CFR Part 17 February 10, 2006

  • Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM et al (2004) MICROCHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waples RS (2006) A bias correction for estimates of effective population size based on linkage disequilibrium at unlinked gene loci. Cons Genet 7:167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114–138

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service & the Butte Environmental Council (Agreement No.: 814208J123) for funding support. We greatly acknowledge field assistant Nicole Luke, and Hattie Brown who greatly assisted in genotype scoring and quality control. We thank Dr. Debra Ayres for manuscript review, and Dr. Derek Girman for use of the Sonoma State Core DNA Facility. We further acknowledge the many local experts land managers and landowners who helped locate and obtain access to a majority of the extant sites of Butte County meadowfoam (Limnanthes floccosa ssp. californica): Jenny Marr (DFG), Chris Clifford (Center for Natural Lands Management), Clif Sellers (formerly City of Chico), Jim Mann (Rural Consulting) Samantha Hillaire, Dr. Patrick Shea (Wildlife Heritage Foundation), Riley Swift & Enoc Vega (Restoration Resources), Tom DiGiovanni (New Urban Builders), Brendan Vieg (City of Chico), Jim Kohler (Chico Municipal Airport), Rod Macdonald, David Kelley and the information reported by Dole (unpublished study).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina M. Sloop.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sloop, C.M., Pickens, C. & Gordon, S.P. Conservation genetics of Butte County meadowfoam (Limnanthes floccosa ssp. californica Arroyo), an endangered vernal pool endemic. Conserv Genet 12, 311–323 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-010-0142-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-010-0142-4

Keywords

Navigation