Skip to main content
Log in

Reverse ascertainment bias in microsatellite allelic diversity in owls (Aves, Strigiformes)

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A rich source of markers may be overlooked by screening for polymorphism in the source species only. We screened 129 microsatellite loci isolated from the powerful owl (Ninox strenua) against two closely related species; Ninox connivens and Ninox novaeseelandiae. From the screening effort 20 polymorphic markers were isolated, including six loci which were originally discarded as they were monomorphic in the source species. Further cross-species amplification of all 20 loci across species from two families, Strigidae and Tytonidae, revealed unusually high levels of polymorphism within closely related species, and limited success within phylogenetically distant species. Routine screening of multiple species during the marker development phase can yield a wider range of polymorphic markers which can subsequently enhance cross-species amplification attempts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Delport W, Grant J, Ryan G, Bloomer P (2006) Ten microsatellite loci for evolutionary research on Nesospiza buntings. Mol Ecol Notes 6:1180–1183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellegren H, Primmer R, Sheldon C (1995) Microsatellite evolution: directionality or bias in locus selection. Nat Genet 11:360–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garnett T, Crowley M (2000) The action plan for Australian birds. Environment Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Updated from Goudet (1995)

  • Higgins E (1999) Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds, vol 4. Parrots and dollarbird. Oxford University Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan F, Burridge C, Cooke R, Norman J (2007) Isolation and characterisation of microsatellite loci to DNA fingerprint the Powerful Owl (Ninox strenua). Mol Ecol Notes 7:1305–1307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinowski T, Taper L, Marshall C (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McInnes M, Dadour R, Stewart E, Ditcham F, Mawson P, Spencer S (2005) Characterization of polymorphic microsatellite markers for the Carnaby’s cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus latirostris) and related black cockatoo species. Mol Ecol Notes 5:504–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Primmer R, Moller P, Ellegren H (1996) A wide-range survey of cross-species microsatellite amplification in birds. Mol Ecol 5:365–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by NSW State Forests, Holsworth Wildlife Research Fund and Birds Australia. Rod Kavanagh and Matthew Stanton are thanked for providing DNA samples. The authors would also like to thank the Ian Potter Foundation and Amersham Biosciences for their generous support in establishing the molecular facilities at Museum Victoria.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fiona E. Hogan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hogan, F.E., Cooke, R. & Norman, J.A. Reverse ascertainment bias in microsatellite allelic diversity in owls (Aves, Strigiformes). Conserv Genet 10, 635–638 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-008-9595-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-008-9595-0

Keywords

Navigation