Skip to main content
Log in

Reconciling molecular signatures across markers: mitochondrial DNA confirms founder effect in invasive North American house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Well-characterized species introductions provide opportunities to compare the genetic signatures of known founder effects across classes of molecular markers. The release of small numbers of house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) into the eastern United States in the 1940s led to substantial interest in the effects of this introduction on genetic diversity in this now abundant species, an issue that has been highlighted by a recent Mycoplasma disease epidemic that most intensively affects the introduced and potentially genetically depauperate house finch populations. Previous studies comparing genetic diversity levels in native and introduced house finch populations produced seemingly disparate results: comparisons based on amplified fragment length polymorphism, RFLP mtDNA, and allozyme markers found essentially equivalent levels of diversity in eastern and western populations, whereas microsatellite markers showed clear reductions in diversity in the introduced populations. Here we employ sequence variation at the ND2 mtDNA locus to further compare levels of diversity between the four native and five introduced house finch populations that were previously examined in the microsatellite study. We found substantially lower ND2 haplotype richness and diversity across all introduced populations of house finches. The majority of sequence variation (78%) was detected within subpopulations, with the remainder (22%) explained by the historical status of each population (native or introduced). Our results are consistent with previous microsatellite evidence for a founder effect during the introduction of eastern house finches, and suggest that the mtDNA founder effect was particularly severe, likely owing to a male-biased sex ratio at the time of introduction coupled with the lower effective population size of clonally inherited markers. We discuss how the inconsistencies between past studies of house finch diversity can inform the usefulness of distinct marker sets for detecting molecular signatures of founder events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anne C (2006) Choosing the right molecular genetic markers for studying biodiversity: from molecular evolution to practical aspects. Genetica 127:101–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Avise JC, Ball RM, Arnold J (1988) Current versus historical population sizes in vertebrate species with high gene flow: a comparison based on mitochondrial DNA lineages and inbreeding theory for neutral mutations. Mol Biol Evol 5:331–344

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benner WL (1991) Mitochondrial DNA variation in the house finch, Carpodacus mexicanus. MS Thesis, Cornell University

  • Birky CWJ (1991) Evolution and population genetics of organelle genes: mechanisms and models. In: Selander KK, Clark AG, Whittam TS (eds) Evolution at the molecular level. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp 112–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock CE, Lepthien LW (1976) Growth in the eastern house finch population 1962–1971. Am Birds 30:791–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Briskie JV, Mackintosh M (2004) Hatching failure increases with severity of population bottlenecks in birds. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 101:558–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cant G, Geis HP (1961) The house finch: a new east coast migrant? East Bird Banding News 102–107

  • Clegg SM, Degnan SM, Kikkawa J et al (2002) Genetic consequences of sequential founder events by an island-colonizing bird. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 99:8127–8132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clement M, Posada D, Crandall K (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657–1660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, Honeycutt R (2005) The molecular toolbox: genetic techniques in wildlife ecology and management. J Wild Manag 69:1362–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhondt AA, Tessaglia DL, Slothower RL (1998) Epidemic mycoplasmal conjunctivitis in house finches from eastern North America. J Wild Dis 34:265–280

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhondt AA, Badyaev A, Dobson AP et al (2006) Mycoplasmal conjunctivitis spreads more slowly in native than in introduced range of the host. Ecohealth 3:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard JR, Bermingham E (2004) Phylogeny and biogeography of the Amazona ochrocephala (Aves: Psittacidae) complex. Auk 121:318–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott JJ, Arbib RSJ (1953) Origin and status of the house finch in the eastern United States. Auk 70:31–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Smouse P, Quattro J (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fallon SM (In Press) Genetic data and the listing of species under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conserv Biol

  • Grant PR, Grant BR, Petren K (2001) A population founded by a single pair of individuals: establishment, expansion, and evolution. Genetica 112/113:359–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harpending MM (1994) Signature of ancient populations growth in a low resolution mitochondrial DNA mismatch distribution. Hum Biol 66:591–600

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley DM, Hanley D, Lovette IJ, Dhondt AA (2006) Molecular evidence for a founder effect in invasive house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus) populations experiencing an emergent disease epidemic. Mol Ecol 15:263–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley DM, Sydenstricker KV, Kollias GV, Dhondt AA (2005) Genetic diversity predicts pathogen resistance and cell-mediated immunocompetence in house finches. Biol Lett 1:326–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick PW (1999) Perspective: highly variable loci and their interpretation in evolution and conservation. Evolution 53:313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE (1993) House Finch (Carpodacus mexicanus). In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The Birds of North America, no. 46. American Ornithologists’ Union, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE (2002) A red bird in a brown bag: the function and evolution of colorful plumage in the house finch. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochochka WM, Dhondt AA (2000) Density-dependent decline of host abundance resulting from a new infectious disease. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 97:5303–5306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honeycutt RL (2000) Genetic applications for large mammals. In: Demarais S, Krausman PR (eds) Ecology and management of large mammals in North America. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp 233–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller LF, Jeffery KJ, Arcese P et al (2001) Immigration and the ephemerality of a natural population bottleneck: evidence from molecular markers. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1387–1394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlmann K, Gross R, Murakaeva A, Kersten P (2003) Genetic variability and structure of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) populations throughout the distribution range inferred from allozyme, microsatellite, and mitochondrial DNA markers. Aquat Living Res 16:421–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merilä J, Björklund M, Baker A (1996) The successful founder: genetics of introduced Carduelis chloris (greenfinch) populations in New Zealand. Heredity 77:410–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Onsins SE, Rozas J (2002) Statistical properties of new neutrality tests against population growth. Mol Biol Evol 19:2092–2100

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 17:230–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozas J, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R (2003) DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19:2496–2497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) Arlequin: a software for population genetics data analysis, Ver 2.001. Genetics and Biometry Lab, Department of Anthropology, University of Geneva, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M, Hudson RR (1991) Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in stable and exponentially growing populations. Genetics 129:555–562

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson MD, Quinn TW (1998) Numts: a challenge for avian systematics and population biology. Auk 115:214–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson MD, Fleischer RC (1996) Multiple independent transpositions of mitochondrial DNA control region sequences to the nucleus. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 93:15239–15243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer CC, Neigel JE, Leberg PL (2000) Experimental evaluation of the usefulness of microsatellite DNA for detecting demographic bottlenecks. Mol Ecol 9:1517–1528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sunnucks P (2000) Efficient genetic markers for population biology. Trends Ecol Evol 15:199–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez-Phillips MA (1992) Population differentiation of the house finch in North America and the Hawaiian Islands. MS Thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto

  • Wang Z, Baker AJ, Hill GE, Edwards SV (2003) Reconciling actual and inferred population histories in the house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus) by AFLP analysis. Evolution 57:2852–2864

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zenger KR, Richardson BJ, Vachot-Griffin AM (2003) A rapid population expansion retains genetic diversity within European rabbits in Australia. Mol Ecol 12:789–794

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to A. Badyaev, J. Klicka, D. Swanson, J. Belthoff, T. Hendry, H. Williams, B. Hartup, A. Davis, and S. Altizer for providing genetic samples, and to L. Stenzler for help with laboratory work. We thank E. and M. Myers, B. Shepard, and C. Mann for allowing us to trap house finches on their properties. This research was supported by the Explorer’s Club Exploration Fund and by the National Science Foundation (Dissertation Improvement Grant DEB 0407543 and NIH-NSF “Ecology of Infectious Disease” DEB 0094456).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dana M. Hawley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hawley, D.M., Briggs, J., Dhondt, A.A. et al. Reconciling molecular signatures across markers: mitochondrial DNA confirms founder effect in invasive North American house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus). Conserv Genet 9, 637–643 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-007-9381-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-007-9381-4

Keywords

Navigation