Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Molecular, quantitative and abiotic variables for the delineation of evolutionary significant units: case of sandalwood (Santalum austrocaledonicum Vieillard) in New Caledonia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various approaches have been developed to define conservation units for plant and animal species. In this study we combined nuclear microsatellites (from a previous published study) and chloroplast microsatellites (assessed in the present study), leaf and seed morphology traits and abiotic variables (climate and soil) to define evolutionary significant units (ESU) of Santalum austrocaledonicum, a tree species growing in New Caledonia. Results for chloroplast microsatellites showed that the total population heterozygosity was␣high, (H cp = 0.84) but varied between islands. Differentiation was strong in the total population (F stcp = 0.66) but also within the main island Grande Terre (F stcp = 0.73) and within Iles Loyauté (F stcp = 0.52), highlighting a limited gene flow between populations. These results confirmed those obtained with nuclear microsatellites. The cluster analysis on molecular markers discriminated two main groups constituted by the populations of Grande Terre and the populations of Iles Loyauté. A principal component analysis of leaf and seed morphology traits singled out the populations of Iles Loyauté and the western populations of Grande Terre. Quantitative genetic analyses showed that the variation between populations was under genetic control (broad sense heritability close to 80%). A high correlation between rainfall and morphological traits suggested an impact of climate on this variation. The integration of these results allows to define two ESUs, one corresponding to Grande Terre and Ile des Pins and the other the Iles Loyauté archipelago. This study stresses the need to restore some populations of Grande Terre that are currently threatened by their small size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addinsoft (2005) XLSTAT software version 7.5.2 http://www.xlstat.com

  • Andrianoelina O, Rakotondraoelina H, Ramamonjisoa L et al. (2006) Genetic diversity of Dalbergia monticola (Fabaceae), an endangered tree species in the fragmented oriental forest of Madagascar. Biodivers Conserv DOI 10.1007/s10531-004-2178-6

  • Barrett SCH (1998) The reproductive biology and genetics of island plants. In: Grant PR (ed) Evolution on islands. Oxford University Press, Oxford UK, pp 18–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekessy SA, Ennos RA, Burgmana MA, Newton AC, Ades PK (2003) Neutral DNA markers fail to detect genetic divergence in an ecologically important trait. Biol Conserv 110:267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottin L, Verhaegen D, Tassin J, Olivieri I, Vaillant A, Bouvet JM (2005) Genetic diversity and population structure of an insular tree, Santalum austrocaledonicum in New Caledonian archipelago. Mol Ecol 14(7):1979–1989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butaud J-F, Rives F, Verhaegen D, JM Bouvet (2005) Distribution of chloroplastic microsatellite diversity in Santalum insulare across the South east Pacific archipelagos. J Biog 32:1763–1774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlquist S (1980) Hawaï: a natural history. geology, climate, native flora and fauna above the shoreline, 2nd edn. Pacific Tropical Botanical Garden, Lawa 9i Hawa 9i

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavers S, Navarro C, Lowe AJ (2004) Targeting genetic resource conservation in widespread species: a case study of Cedrela odorata L. For Ecol Mgmt 197:285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox PA, Elmquist T, Pierson ED, Rainey WE (1991) Flying foxes as strong interactors in South Pacific islands ecosystems: a conservation hypothesis. Conserv Biol 5:448–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall KA, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Mace GM, Wayne RK (2000) Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 15:290–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ennos RA (1994) Estimating the relative rates of pollen and seed migration among plant populations. Heredity 72:250–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS, Mckay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Sci and Tech, Harlow United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine C, Lovett PN, Sanou H, Maley J, Bouvet JM (2004) Genetic diversity of the shea tree (Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn), detected by RAPD and chloroplast microsatellite markers. Heredity 93:639–648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R (1997) Do island populations have less genetic variation than mainland populations? Heredity 78:311–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R (1998) Inbreeding and extinction: island populations. Conserv Biol 78:665–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gapare WJ, Aitken SN, Ritland CE (2005) Genetic diversity of core and peripheral Sitka pruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr) populations: implications for conservation of widespread species. Biol Conserv 123:113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs D, Barnes E, Cox J (2001) Pigeons and doves. A guide to the pigeons and doves of the world. Pica press, Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie TW, Jaffré T (2003) Tropical dry forests in New Caledonia. Biodiv Conserv 12:1687–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodall-Copestake WP, Hollingsworth ML, Hollingsworth PM, Jenkins GI, Collin E (2005) Molecular markers and ex situ conservation of the European elms (Ulmus spp.). Biol Conserv 122:537–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King RA, Ferris C (1998) Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. Mol Ecol 7:1151–1161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinschmit JRG, Kownatzki D, Gregorius HR (2004) Adaptational characteristics of autochthonous populations—consequences for provenance delineation. For Ecol Mgmt 197:213–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mc Donald PG, Fonseca CR, Overton J McC, Westoby M (2003) Leaf size divergence along rainfall and soil-nutrient gradients: is the method of size reduction common among clades?. Funct Ecol 17:50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay JK, Latta RG (2002) Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends Ecol Evol 17:285–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz C (1994) Defining 8 evolutionary significant unit 9 for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 9:373–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz C (2002) Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Syst Biol 51:238–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeler RA, Mittermeler CG, da Fonceca GAB, Kent G (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton AC, Allnut TR, Gillies ACM, Lowe AJ, Ennos RA (1999) Molecular phylogeography, intraspecific variation and the conservation of tree species. Trends Ecol Evol 14:140–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ORSTOM (1981), Atlas de Nouvelle Calédonie et Dépendances

  • Perrier X, Flori A, Bonnot F (2003). Data analysis methods. In: Hamon P, Seguin M, Perrier X, Glaszmann JC (eds) Genetic diversity of cultivated tropical plants. Enfield Science Publishers, Montpellier, pp 43–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizo MA, Von Allmen C, Morellato LPC (2006) Seed size variation in the palm Euterpe edulis and of seed predators on germination and seedling survival. Acta Oecologia (in press) doi:10.1016/j.actao.2005.11.011

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (Version 3.2a): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenism. J Heredity 86:248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 17:230–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder OA (1986) Species conservation and systematics: the dilemma of subspecies. Trends Ecol Evol 1:9–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackville Hamilton NR (2001) Is local provenance important in habitat creation? A reply. J Appl Ecol 38:1374–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanou H, Picard N, Lovett PN, Dembélé M, Korbo A, Diarisso D, Bouvet JM (2006) Phenotypic variation of agromorphological traits of the shea tree, Vitellaria paradoxa C.F Gaertn, in Mali. Genet. Resour Crop Evol 53:145–161 DOI 10.1007/s10722-004-1809-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (1990) SAS/STAT user 9s guide, release 6.03 edn. SAS Institute Inc., Gary N.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) Arlequin: a software for population genetics data analysis. User manual ver 2.0. Genetics and Biometry Lab, Dept. Anthropology, University of Geneva. 11 pages. Free program distributed by the authors over internet from lgb.unige.ch/arlequin/

  • Shineberg D (1967) They came for sandalwood. Melbourne University Press

  • Silvertown J (1989). The paradox of seed size and adaptation. Trends Ecol Evol 4:24–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson DM (2001) Is local provenance important in habitat creation? J Appl Ecol 38:1371–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1951) The genetical studies of population. Ann Eugen 15:328–354

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

These results are part of Lorraine Bottin 9s PhD thesis on the analysis of genetic diversity of Santalum austrocaledonicum. This study was supported by the sandalwood project funded by the MEDD, the French Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable Development. The laboratory work and analyses were done in the Forest Department of Cirad in Montpellier, France, where J.M. Bouvet is the head of the “Forest Genetics” research unit. We would like to thank Alexandre Vaillant for laboratory work, and Alexandre Lagrange and Géraldine Derroire for field work in New Caledonia. Many thanks go to IAC (Institut Agronomique néo-Calédonien) and to the Development Services of the Provinces of Islands, North and South which facilitated the field operation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Marc Bouvet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bottin, L., Tassin, J., Nasi, R. et al. Molecular, quantitative and abiotic variables for the delineation of evolutionary significant units: case of sandalwood (Santalum austrocaledonicum Vieillard) in New Caledonia. Conserv Genet 8, 99–109 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-006-9152-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-006-9152-7

Keywords

Navigation