Skip to main content
Log in

Electrical Brain Activity, Family Functioning, and Parent–Adolescent Conflict Communication

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As family conflict tends to escalate during the adolescent years, the subsequent effects of adolescence on parent–child dynamics are systemically experienced, both intra- and inter-personally. As such, widening the scope of literature targeted towards better understanding the parent–adolescent conflict relationship is merited. To offer a more gestalt view of parent–adolescent conflict processes, the present study takes a biopsychosocial view of the mother–father–adolescent relationship by considering electrical brain activity using electroencephalography technology. Specifically, electrical brain activity was recorded during two problem-solving family discussions between a mother, father, and adolescent child. Data is analyzed from a pilot study of 11 triads, for a total of 33 participants, examining the statistical relationships between brain waves and self-reported measures of family functioning and distress. Findings suggest that hemispheric lateralization occurs during parent–adolescent problem-solving discussions thus reminding therapists of the importance in using a biopsychosocial lens when assisting families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, J. P. (2008). The attachment system in adolescence. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 419–435). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. S. (2008). Stens Corporation four-day professional EEG biofeedback certification training presentation manual. San Rafael, CA: Stens Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, B., Atkinson, L., Kutz, P., Lata, J., Lata, K. W., Szekely, J., et al. (2005). Rewiring neural states in couples therapy: Advances from affective neuroscience. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 24(3), 3–16. doi:10.1521/jsyt.2005.24.3.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, C. F., & Cross, D. (2008). Beyond the dyad: Prospects for social development. In N. A. Card, J. P. Selig, & T. Little (Eds.), Modeling dyadic and interdependent data in the developmental and behavioral and behavioral sciences (pp. 387–409). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coan, J. A., & Allen, J. J. B. (2004). Frontal EEG asymmetry as a moderator and mediator of emotion. Biological Psychology, 67(1–2), 7–49. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozolino, L. (2006). The neuroscience of human relationships: Attachment and the developing brain. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aniello, C. (2013). Contemporary MFT models’ alignment with relational common factors. Journal of Contemporary Family Therapy, 35(4), 673–683. doi:10.1007/s10591-013-9260-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. E. (2004). Adolescent brain development: A period of vulnerabilities and opportunities. In R. E. Dahl & L. P. Spear (Eds.), Adolescent brain development: Vulnerabilities and opportunities (pp. 1–22). New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. J., Jackson, D. C., & Kalin, N. H. (2000). Emotion, plasticity, context, and regulation: Perspectives from affective neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 890–909. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.890.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. J., Pizzagalli, D., & Nitschke, J. B. (2009). The representation and regulation of emotion in depression: Perspectives from affective neuroscience. In I. Gotlib & C. Hammen (Eds.), Handbook of depression (pp. 218–248). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delevi, R., Cornille, T., & Cui, M. (2012). Does positivity matter? The impact of interparental interactions on young adult conflict management. Journal of Contemporary Family Therapy, 34(1), 124–140. doi:10.1007/s10591-012-9179-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eğeci, S. I., & Gençöz, T. (2006). Factors associated with relationship satisfaction: Importance of communication skills. Journal of Contemporary Family Therapy, 28(3), 383–391. doi:10.1007/s10591-006-9010-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L. M., & Bishop, D. S. (1983). The McMaster family assessment device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9(2), 171–180. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01497.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, N. B., Bishop, D. S., & Levin, S. (1978). The McMaster model of family functioning. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 4(4), 19–31. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1978.tb00537.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. S. (1904). Adolescence; its psychology and its relations to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime, religion and education. New York: D. Appleton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon-Jones, E., & Peterson, C. K. (2009). Electroencephalographic methods in social and personality psychology. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. S. Beer (Eds.), Methods in social neuroscience (pp. 170–197). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon-Jones, E., & Sigelman, J. D. (2001). State anger and prefrontal brain activity: Evidence that insult-related relative left-prefrontal activation is associated with experienced anger and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 797–803. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.797.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon-Jones, E., & Winkielman, P. (2007). Social neuroscience: Integrating biological and psychological explanations of social behavior. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, H. H. (1958). The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, C., Werner-Wilson, R., Parker, T., & Lianekhammy, J. (2014). Alpha to omega: A neurological analysis of marital conflict in a pilot study. Journal of Contemporary Family Therapy, 36(1), 83–92. doi:10.1007/s10591-013-9296-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, R. W., & Ekman, P. (2002). Difficulty does not account for emotion-specific heart rate changes in the directed facial action task. Psychobiology, 39(3), 397–405. doi:10.1017/S0048577201393150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D., Garske, J., & Davis, M. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(3), 438–450. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.68.3.438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGue, M., Elkins, I., Walden, B., & Iacono, W. G. (2005). Perceptions of the parent–adolescent relationship: A longitudinal investigation. Developmental Psychology, 41(6), 971–984. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.971.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNamee, C. M. (2005). Bilateral art: Integrating art therapy, family therapy, and neuroscience. Journal of Contemporary Family Therapy, 27(4), 545–557. doi:10.1007/s10591-005-8241-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, N., & Bower, P. (2000). Patient-centredness: A conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Social Science and Medicine, 51(7), 1087–1110. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00098-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, S. A., Stollak, G. E., Aronoff, J., Messé, L. A., Loraas, J. A., & Woike, B. A. (1996). Boundary regulation in family and personal systems: Perceptions of late adolescents. Journal of Contemporary Family Therapy, 18(2), 279–290. doi:10.1007/BF02196728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, I. W., Epstein, N. B., Bishop, D. S., & Keitner, G. I. (1985). The McMaster family assessment device: Reliability and validity. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 11(4), 345–356. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1985.tb00028.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, I. W., Ryan, C. E., Keitner, G. I., Bishop, D. S., & Epstein, N. B. (2000). The McMaster approach to families: Theory, assessment and research. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 168–189. doi:10.1111/1467-6427.00145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. A., Young, M. S., Weir, J. M., & Ochshorn, E. (2007). An evaluation of a holistic program for at-risk teens and their parents. Journal of Contemporary Family Therapy, 29(3), 129–145. doi:10.1007/s10591-007-9041-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G. J., Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (2009). Social neuroscience. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(1), 60–68. doi:10.1002/wcs.29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranson, K. E., & Urichuk, L. J. (2008). The effect of parent-child attachment relationships on child biopsychosocial outcomes: A review. Early Child Development and Care, 178(2), 129–152. doi:10.1080/03004430600685282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. D. (2007). Lives lived in milliseconds: Using cognitive methods in personality research. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Kruger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 345–359). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, C. E., Epstein, N. B., Keitner, G. I., Miller, I. W., & Bishop, D. S. (2005). Evaluating and treating families: The McMaster approach. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelef, K., Diamond, G. M., Diamond, G. S., & Liddle, H. A. (2005). Adolescent and parent alliance and treatment outcome in multidimensional family therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(4), 689–698. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.4.689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. J. (1999). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78–106. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Urry, H. L., Nitchke, J. B., Jackson, D. C., Dalton, K. M., Mueller, C. J., Rosenkranz, M. A., et al. (2004). Making a life worth living: Neural correlates of well-being. Psychological Science, 15(6), 367–372. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00686.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Werner-Wilson, R. J., Lianekhammy, J., Frey, L. M., Parker, T., Wood, N. D., Kimberly, C., et al. (2011). Alpha asymmetry in female military spouses following deployment. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 23(3–4), 202–217. doi:10.1080/08952833.2011.604534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yurgelun-Todd, D. (2007). Emotional and cognitive changes during adolescence. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17(2), 251–257. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2007.03.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nichole Huff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huff, N., Werner-Wilson, R. & Kimberly, C. Electrical Brain Activity, Family Functioning, and Parent–Adolescent Conflict Communication. Contemp Fam Ther 36, 409–416 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-014-9307-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-014-9307-5

Keywords

Navigation