Abstract
Recent attention given to environmental concerns has been vaulted to the forefront of American society and the world. This has resulted in an increase in ecologically minded practices known as the ‘go green’ movement. Despite the overlap between environmental sustainability and systemic thought, marriage/couple and family therapists (M/CFTs) have remained relatively silent regarding ecologically friendly practices within training and clinical practice. In this qualitative study (the first one of its kind), we asked 25 M/CFT trainees to describe their perceptions of ecological and family sustainability in general, as well as in the context of applying eco-informed language and practice into their therapy. In general, M/CFT trainees reported that although they believe that ecological practices are important for families, they struggle with what the inclusion of such practices might look like practically. Implications for clinical practice and training are presented as well as suggestions for future research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychological Association. (2008). Psychology and global climate change: Addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Task Force on the Interface between Psychology and Global Climate Change.
Barton, J., & Pretty, J. (2010). What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environmental Science and Technology, 44(10), 3947–3955. doi:10.1021/es903183r.
Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: Hampton Press.
Becvar, D. S. (2009, October). Providing news of difference: Family therapy through the years. Plenary session address at the annual meeting of the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy, Sacramento, CA.
Becvar, D. S., & Becvar, R. J. (1999). Systems theory and family therapy: A primer. Lanham, MD: University Press.
Besthorn, F. H., Wulff, D., & St. George, S. (2010). Eco-spiritual helping and postmodern therapy: A deeper ecological framework. Ecopsychology, 2(1), 23–32. doi:10.1089/eco.2009.0045.
Blumer, M. L. C., & Murphy, M. J. (2011). Alaskan gay male’s couple experiences of societal non-support: Coping through families of choice and therapeutic means. Contemporary Family Therapy, 33(2), 1–18. doi:10.1007/s10591-011-9147-5.
Briodo, E. M., & Manning, K. (2002). Philosophical foundations and current theoretical perspectives in qualitative research. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 434–445. Retrieved June 30, 2002 from ERIC.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Recent perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723–742. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723.
Buck, J. (2002). The go green initiative. Pleasanton, CA: Environmental Education and Stewardship Program.
Dauncey, G. (2010). Sustainability: A new renaissance. Econews: Promoting the vision of a sustainable Vancouver Island, 206, 1-3. Retrieved July 14, 2011 from: http://www.earthfuture.com/econews/.
De Zoysa, R., & Newman, O. (2009). Crisis and resurgence: Redefining the United States and European Union relationship in the face of global challenges. 21st Century Society: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 4(3), 297–318.
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Environmental degradation and human well-being: Report of the millennium ecosystem assessment. (2005). Population & Development Review, 31(2), 389–398. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00073.x.
Environmental Protection Agency. (2010). Sustainability. Retrieved January 5, 2010 from: http://www.epa.gov/sustainability/basicinfo.htm#sustainability.
Erickson, M.R. (n.d.). Shared nature experience as a pathway to strong family bonds. Children and Nature network. Retrieved January 2, 2012 from http://www.childrenandnature.org/downloads/CNN_LWS_Vol1_01.pdf.
Fife, S. T., Blumer, M. L. C., Hertlein, K. M., & Knowles, S. J. (2010, November). “Going green” in Marriage and Family Therapy Training and Practice. Poster, National Council of Family Relations Annual Conference. Minneapolis, MN.
Fife, S. T., & Whiting, J. (2007). Values in family therapy practice and research: An invitation for reflection. Contemporary Family Therapy, 29, 71–86. doi:10.1007/s10591-007-9027-1.
Hardy, K. V. (2010, March). Home, hope, and homelessness in the midst of challenging times. Plenary session address and the XVII World International Family Therapy Association Congress. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Hermann, L. (1999). Therapist and client values: A look at similarity in relation to client change. Unpublished Dissertation. Ohio State University.
Hertlein, K. M., Fife, S. T., Blumer, M. L. C., Smith, J., & Card, L. (2010, March). Encouraging M/CFTs to go green. Poster, XVIII World International Family Therapy Association Congress. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Hope, L. B., Milewski-Hertlein, K. A., & Rodriguez, A. (2001). Removing the gag that binds: An examination of therapeutic implications of political correctness. Contemporary Family Therapy, 23(1), 33–49.
Howell, A. J., Dopko, R. L., Passmore, H., & Buro, K. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 166–171. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.037.
Kuehl, B. (2009, October). Re-membering couple and family therapy. Opening plenary session address at the annual meeting of the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy, Sacramento, CA.
Laszloffy, T. A. (2009). Remembering the pattern that connects: Toward an eco-informed M/CFT. Contemporary Family Therapy, 31, 222–236. doi:10.1007/s10591-009-9092-8.
Maddock, J. W., & Larson, N. R. (2004). The ecological approach to incestuous families. In D. R. Catherall (Ed.), Handbook of trauma, stress, and the family (pp. 367–392). New York: Brunner-Routledge.
Maturana, H. R. (1975). The organization of the living: A theory of the living organism. The International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 7, 313–332. doi:10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80015-0.
Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Robbins, M. S., Mayorga, C. C., & Szapocznik, J. (2003). The ecosystemic “lens” to understanding family functioning. In T. L. Sexton, G. R. Weeks, & M. S. Robbins (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy: The science and practice in working with families and couples (pp. 21–36). New York: Brunner-Routledge.
Tsai, M., Kohlenberg, R. J., Bolling, M. Y., & Terry, C. (2008). Values in therapy and Green FAP. In M. Tsai, R. J. Kohlenberg, J. W. Kanter, B. Kohlenberg, W. C. Follette, & G. M. Callaghan (Eds.), A guide to Functional Analytic Psychotherapy: Awareness, courage, love, and behaviorism (pp. 1–14). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-09787-9_9.
Twist, M. (2005). A response to the babies and bosses report: The effects of policy on therapy and the influence of therapists on politics. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 17, 67–77. doi:10.1300/J086v17n03_04.
United States Census Bureau (2009). International database. Retrieved January 4, 2010 from: http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/idb/worldpop.php.
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory. New York: George Braziller.
Warnock, H. (2010, March). Does nature have anything to do with natural systems or, what is an ecomap? Workshop, XVIII World International Family Therapy Association Congress. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Wilson, E. O., & Kellert, S. R. (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press/Shearwater Brooks.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blumer, M.L.C., Hertlein, K.M. & Fife, S.T. It’s not Easy Becoming Green: Student-Therapist Perceptions of Family Therapy in an Eco-sustainable age. Contemp Fam Ther 34, 72–88 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-012-9175-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-012-9175-9