Skip to main content
Log in

Reputation to understand society

  • SI: ICORE2011
  • Published:
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. New Oxford American Dictionary, 2nd edition, © 2005 by Oxford University Press, Inc.

  2. As an evidence of the cited improvements, see for example the Gapminder graph at www.bit.ly/atV7EP.

  3. Comte, System of Positive Philosophy, first edition 1830, as cited by Ball (2002).

  4. The pre-proceedings of ICORE 2011 can be accessed at http://2011.icore.name/.

  5. This is a reference to a humorous comment given during the presentation; we leave its interpretation to the fantasy of the reader.

References

  • Avegliano P, Sichman JS (2008a) Repart: a reputation-based simulation tool for partnership formation. In: Wainwright RL, Haddad H (eds) SAC. ACM, New York, pp 46–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Avegliano P, Sichman JS (2008b) Using the RePart simulator to analyze different reputation-based partnership formation strategies within a marketplace scenario. In: Falcone et al. (2008), pp 226–243

  • Ball P (2002) The physical modelling of society: a historical perspective. Phys A, Stat Mech Appl 314(1–4):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi C, Falcone R (2010) Trust theory: a socio-cognitive and computational model. Wiley series in agent technology, vol 18. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Conte R, Paolucci M (2002) Reputation in artificial societies—social beliefs for social order. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Falcone R, Barber KS, Sabater-Mir J, Singh MP (eds) (2008) Trust in agent societies, 11th international workshop, TRUST 2008, Estoril, Portugal, May 12–13, 2008. revised selected and invited papers. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5396. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassani Mahmooei B, Parris BW (2013) Dynamics of effort allocation and evolution of trust: an agent-based model. Comput Math Organ Theory. doi:10.1007/s10588-013-9164-z

  • Hansson K, Karlström P, Larsson A, Verhagen H (2013) Reputation, inequality and meeting techniques: visualizing user hierarchy to support collaboration. Comput Math Organ Theory. doi:10.1007/s10588-013-9165-y

  • Helbing D, Johansson A, Abideen HZA (2007) Dynamics of crowd disasters: an empirical study. Phys Rev E 75(4):046109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook JB (2013) What is interdisciplinary communication? Reflections on the very idea of disciplinary integration. Synthese 190(11):1865–1879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letia IA, Slavescu RR (2012) Logic-based reputation model in e-commerce simulation. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 15(3). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/15/3/7.html

  • Matzat U, Snijders C (2012) Rebuilding trust in online shops on consumer review sites: sellers’ responses to user-generated complaints. J Comput-Mediat Commun 18(1):62–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardin LG, Brandão AAF, Sichman JS (2011) Experiments on semantic interoperability of agent reputation models using the SOARI architecture. Eng Appl Artif Intell 24(8):1461–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardin LG, Brandão A, Sichman JS, Vercouter L (2008) SOARI: a service oriented architecture to support agent reputation models interoperability. In: Falcone et al. (2008), pp 292–307

  • Nardin LG, Brandão A, Kira E, Sichman JS (2013) Effects of reputation communication expressiveness in virtual societies. Comput Math Organ Theory. doi:10.1007/s10588-012-9151-9

  • Paglieri F, Castelfranchi C, da Costa Pereira C, Falcone R, Tettamanzi A, Villata S (2013) Trusting the messenger because of the message: feedback dynamics from information quality to source evaluation. Comput Math Organ Theory. doi:10.1007/s10588-013-9166-x

  • Paolucci M (ed) (2010) Proceedings of the first international conference on reputation: theory and technology, Rome, Italy. ISTC-CNR

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolucci M, Picascia S, Marmo S (2010) Electronic reputation systems. In: Handbook of research on Web 2.0, 3.0, and X.0. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 411–429. Chap 23

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabater J, Paolucci M, Conte R (2006) Repage: REPutation and ImAGE among limited autonomous partners. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 9(2). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/2/3.html

  • Squazzoni F, Bravo G, Takács K (2012) Does incentive provision increase the quality of peer review? An experimental study. Res Policy 42(1):287–294. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to all of the authors who have submitted their papers to ICORE 2011 and especially to those that have enhanced and extended their work, and patiently awaited for the time necessary in order to be published in this issue.

We would also like to thank our colleagues that acted as reviewers of ICORE 2011.

Mario Paolucci acknowledges support from the PRISMA project (PON04a2 Aunder) within the Italian National Program for Research and Innovation (PON 2007–2013) and from the GLODERS project (EC FP7) under grant agreement No. 315874. Jaime Simão Sichman is partially supported by CNPq and FAPESP, Brazil.

Finally, we would like to thank Kathleen Carley for accepting to publish this special issue in the CMOT journal.

July 2013

Mario Paolucci

Jaime Simão Sichman

Guest Editors

Special issue on “ICORE 2011”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaime Simão Sichman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paolucci, M., Sichman, J.S. Reputation to understand society. Comput Math Organ Theory 20, 211–217 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-013-9168-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-013-9168-8

Keywords

Navigation