Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-domain ontology mapping based on semantics

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ontology mapping indicates the semantic interconnection between the concepts of ontologies, while multi-domain ontology mapping is usually used to solve the semantic interconnection problem between domain ontologies. However, due to the differences in the definition approaches, there exists the heterogeneity among the domain ontologies to a certain extent. This paper proposes a probability-based and similarity-based ontology mapping algorithm, the purpose of which is to calculate the similarity between the concepts of the multi-domain ontology. Using the ESA algorithm based on Wikipedia and the principle that the similarity between the concepts with the same name equals 1, the paper proposes a new concept, ontology mapping association graph, to represent mapping results. The experiments show that the accuracy rate of the probability-based and similarity-based ontology mapping algorithm can reach 80% on both two Chinese test sets, namely, WordSimilarity-353 and Words-240. Compared with other algorithms, it does stand out on the aspect of accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cerón-Figueroa, S., López-Yáñez, I., Alhalabi, W., et al.: Instance-based ontology matching for e-learning material using an associative pattern classifier. Comput. Hum. Behav. 69, 218–225 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Doan, A.H., Madhavan, J., Dhamankar, R., et al.: Learning to match ontologies on the semantic web. VLDB J. 12(4), 303–319 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Noy, N.F.: Ontology Mapping, pp. 30–52. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kalfoglou, Y., Schorlemmer, M.: Ontology mapping: the state of the art. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 18(1), 1–31 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin, J.X.Y.X., Zhang, H.L.Y.: Advanced web technologies and applications. In: Asia-Pacific Web Conference, pp. 72–85 (2004)

  6. Qiu, L., Yu, J., Pu, Q., et al.: Knowledge entity learning and representation for ontology matching based on deep neural networks. Cluster Comput. 20, 969–977 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Husein, I.G., Akbar, S., Sitohang, B., et al.: Review of ontology matching with background knowledge. In: 2016 International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICoDSE), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2016)

  8. Messaouda, F., Hadjer, G., Refinement, C.E.: Reuse of ontologies semantic mapping. In: IEEE/ACS 12th International Conference of Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2015)

  9. Do, H.: Schema matching and mapping-based data integration. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, Universitt Leipzig (2006)

  10. Hernandez, M., Miller, R., Haas, L., Yan, L., Howard Ho, C.T., Tian, X.: Clio: A semi-automatic tool for schema mapping. In: SIGMOD Record (2001)

  11. Ehrig, M., Staab, S.: QOM-quick ontology mapping. In: International Semantic Web Conference, vol. 3298, pp. 683–697. (2004)

  12. Boddy, M.: Anytime problem solving using dynamic programming. In: Proceedings of the Ninth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Anaheim, California, pp. 738–743. Shaker Verlag (1991)

  13. Mitra, P., Wiederhold, G.: Resolving terminological heterogeneity in ontologies. In: Proceedings of the ECAI’02 Workshop on Ontologies and Semantic Interoperability (2002)

  14. Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: The PROMPT suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. Int. J. Hum Comput. Stud. 59(6), 983–1024 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Domingos, P., Halevy, A.: Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web. In: The Eleventh International WWW Conference, Hawaii, US (2002)

  16. Kishore, R., Ramesh, R.: Ontologies: A Handbook of Principles, Concepts and Applications in Information Systems. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Bakhtiar, A.: Filsafat Agama I, cet. I hlm, vol. 169. Logos Wacana Ilmu, Jakarta (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J.R., Benjamins, V.R.: What are ontologies, and why do we need them? IEEE Intell. Syst. Appl. 14(1), 20–26 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sarno, R., Anistyasari, Y., Fitri, R.: Semantic Search: Pencarian Berdasarkan Konten. Penerbit Andi, Yogyakarta (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Krishnan, K., Krishnan, R., Muthumari, A.: A semantic-based ontology mapping–information retrieval for mobile learning resources. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 39, 169–178 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, X., Cheng, B., Liao, J., et al.: OMI-DL: an ontology matching framework. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 9(4), 580–593 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, X., Cao, L., Dai, W.: Overview on ontology mapping and approach. In: IEEE International Conference on Broadband Network and Multimedia Technology, pp. 592–595. IEEE (2011)

  23. Ehrig, M., Sure, Y.: Ontology mapping-an integrated approah. In: Proc. of the 1st European Semantic Web Symposium, Heraklion, Greece, pp. 76–91. Springer, Berlin (2004)

  24. Bouquet, P., Euzenat, J., Franoni, E., et al.: Speifiation of a common framework for characterizing alignment. Knowledge Web Deliverable 2.2.1v2, University of Karlsruhe (2004)

  25. Liu, J., Zhang, X., Sun, W.: Review of ontology mapping representation mechanism. In: International Conference on Broadcast Technology and Multimedia Communication (2010)

  26. Natalya, F.N.: Ontology mapping. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies, pp. 573–590. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou, Qingyuan, Luo, Jianjian: Artificial neural network based grid computing of E-government scheduling for emergency management. Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng. 30(5), 327–335 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou, Qingyuan, Luo, Juan: The service quality evaluation of ecologic economy systems using simulation computing. Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng. 31(6), 453–460 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou, Q.: Multi-layer affective computing model based on emotional psychology. Electron. Commer. Res. (2017). doi:10.1007/s10660-017-9265-8

  30. Zhou, Q., Luo, J.: The study on evaluation method of urban network security in the big data era. Intell. Autom. Soft Comput. (2017). doi:10.1080/10798587.2016.1267444

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Software Engineering Institute, Xidian University, Xi’an, China

    Shengli Song & Guimin Qin

  2. School of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi’an, China

    Xiang Zhang

Authors
  1. Shengli Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guimin Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shengli Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, S., Zhang, X. & Qin, G. Multi-domain ontology mapping based on semantics. Cluster Comput 20, 3379–3391 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1087-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1087-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation