Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Histopathological growth patterns of resected non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases: a retrospective multicenter study

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Distinct Histopathological Growth Patterns can be identified in liver metastases from melanoma, breast and colorectal cancers. For each of these distinct liver metastasis types the HGP has proven a biomarker for survival after partial hepatectomy, with the desmoplastic type marking favourable prognosis. Whether HGPs can be considered a pan-cancer phenomenon remains unknown. This study therefore evaluates the presence of HGPs and their prognostic value across non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases.

Methods

A retrospective multicentre cohort study was performed in patients who underwent curative intent resection of non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastasis. HGPs were assessed on Haematoxylin and Eosin slides according to consensus guidelines and classified as desmoplastic or non-desmoplastic. Overall- and recurrence-free survival were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox regression analysis.

Results

In total, 132 patients with liver metastasis from 25 different tumour types were eligible for analysis, of which 26 (20%) had a desmoplastic HGP. Five-year OS and RFS (95%CI) were 53% (36–78%) versus 40% (30–53%), and 33% (19–61%) versus 15% (9–27%) for patients with desmoplastic compared to non-desmoplastic metastases, respectively (p = 0.031 & p = 0.004). On multivariable analysis (adjusted HR [95%CI]) a desmoplastic HGP was prognostic for both OS (0.46 [0.25–0.86]) and RFS (0.38 [0.21–0.69]).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that HGPs apply to liver metastases across a wide variety of primary tumour origins. They hold a prognostic value in these cases, suggesting that HGPs could represent a pan-cancer biomarker for survival after surgical resection of liver metastases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be available on reasonable request.

References

  1. van Dam PJ et al (2017) International consensus guidelines for scoring the histopathological growth patterns of liver metastasis. Br J Cancer 117(10):1427–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.334

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Vermeulen PB et al (2001) Liver metastases from colorectal adenocarcinomas grow in three patterns with different angiogenesis and desmoplasia. J Pathol 195(3):336–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.966

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Galjart B et al (2019) Angiogenic desmoplastic histopathological growth pattern as a prognostic marker of good outcome in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Angiogenesis 22(2):355–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-019-09661-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoppener DJ et al (2021) Histopathological Growth Patterns and Survival After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis: An External Validation Study. JNCI Cancer Spectr 5(3):pkab026. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkab026

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Buisman FE et al (2020) Histopathological growth patterns as biomarker for adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in patients with resected colorectal liver metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis 37(5):593–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-020-10048-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Frentzas S et al (2016) Vessel co-option mediates resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy in liver metastases. Nat Med 22(11):1294–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lendoire J et al (2007) Liver resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine metastases: Analysis of a multicenter study from Argentina. HPB (Oxford) 9(6):435–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/13651820701769701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Takemura N, Saiura A (2017) Role of surgical resection for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases. World J Hepatol 9(5):242–51. https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v9.i5.242

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Maeda Y et al (2015) Hepatectomy for liver metastases in non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine cancer patients. The survival benefit in primary unresectable cases. Int J Surg 22:136–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoffmann K et al (2015) Is Hepatic resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases justified? Ann Surg Oncol 22(Suppl 3):S1083–S1092. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4775-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Adam R et al (2006) Hepatic resection for noncolorectal nonendocrine liver metastases: analysis of 1,452 patients and development of a prognostic model. Ann Surg 244(4):524–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000239036.46827.5f

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sauerbrei W et al (2018) Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): An Abridged Explanation and Elaboration. J Natl Cancer Inst 110(8):803–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Team RC (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing,

  14. Bohlok A et al (2020) Association between the histopathological growth patterns of liver metastases and survival after hepatic surgery in breast cancer patients. NPJ Breast Cancer 6(1):64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-020-00209-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Barnhill R et al (2020) Replacement and desmoplastic histopathological growth patterns in cutaneous melanoma liver metastases: Frequency, characteristics, and robust prognostic value. J Pathol Clin Res 6(3):195–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.161

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakashima T et al (1982) Histologic growth pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma: relationship to orcein (hepatitis B surface antigen)-positive cells in cancer tissue. Hum Pathol 13(6):563–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0046-8177(82)80272-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nierop PM et al (2021) Preoperative systemic chemotherapy alters the histopathological growth patterns of colorectal liver metastases. J Pathol Clin Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.235

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Höppener DJ et al (2019) Histopathological growth patterns of colorectal liver metastasis exhibit little heterogeneity and can be determined with a high diagnostic accuracy. Clin Exp Metastasis 36(4):311–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoppener DJ et al (2020) Enrichment of the tumour immune microenvironment in patients with desmoplastic colorectal liver metastasis. Br J Cancer 123(2):196–206. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0881-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Boland CR, Goel A (2010) Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 138(6):2073 e3–87 e3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen DS, Mellman I (2017) Elements of cancer immunity and the cancer-immune set point. Nature 541(7637):321–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Latacz E et al (2021) Can medical imaging identify the histopathological growth patterns of liver metastases? Semin Cancer Biol 71:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bohlok A et al (2020) The lack of selection criteria for surgery in patients with non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases. World J Surg Oncol 18(1):106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01883-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoppener DJ et al (2019) Histopathological growth patterns of colorectal liver metastasis exhibit little heterogeneity and can be determined with a high diagnostic accuracy. Clin Exp Metastasis 36(4):311–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-019-09975-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Nielsen K et al (2014) The morphological growth patterns of colorectal liver metastases are prognostic for overall survival. Mod Pathol 27(12):1641–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2014.4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nystrom H et al (2012) Liver-metastatic potential of colorectal cancer is related to the stromal composition of the tumour. Anticancer Res 32(12):5183–91

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Siriwardana PN et al (2016) Biological and prognostic significance of the morphological types and vascular patterns in colorectal liver metastases (crlm): Looking beyond the tumor margin. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(8):e2924. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Barnhill R et al (2018) Replacement and desmoplastic histopathological growth patterns: A pilot study of prediction of outcome in patients with uveal melanoma liver metastases. J Pathol Clin Res 4(4):227–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Donckier.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. No funding was received for conducting this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 761 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meyer, Y., Bohlok, A., Höppener, D. et al. Histopathological growth patterns of resected non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases: a retrospective multicenter study. Clin Exp Metastasis 39, 433–442 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-022-10153-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-022-10153-y

Keywords

Navigation