Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A large-scale bibliometric analysis of global climate change research between 2001 and 2018

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global climate change is attracting widespread scientific, political, and public attention owing to the involvement of international initiatives such as the Paris Agreement and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. We present a large-scale bibliometric analysis based on approximately 120,000 climate change publications between 2001 and 2018 to examine how climate change is studied in scientific research. Our analysis provides an overview of scientific knowledge, shifts of research hotspots, global geographical distribution of research, and focus of individual countries. In our analysis, we identify five key fields in climate change research: physical sciences, paleoclimatology, climate-change ecology, climate technology, and climate policy. We draw the following key conclusions: (1) Over the investigated time period, the focus of climate change research has shifted from understanding the climate system toward climate technologies and policies, such as efficient energy use and legislation. (2) There is an imbalance in scientific production between developed and developing countries. (3) Geography, national demands, and national strategies have been important drivers that influence the research interests and concerns of researchers in different countries. Our study can be used by researchers and policymakers to reflect on the directions in which climate change research is developing and discuss priorities for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Our research is based on data from the Web of Science database. This is a proprietary database. We are not allowed to share the data used in our research.

References

  • Ackerly DD, Loarie SR, Cornwell WK, Weiss SB, Hamilton H, Branciforte R, Kraft NJB (2010) The geography of climate change: implications for conservation biogeography. Divers Distrib 16:476–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja I, De Vos RCH, Bones AM, Hall RD (2010) Plant molecular stress responses face climate change. Trends Plant Sci 15:664–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archambault É, Campbell D, Gingras Y, Larivière V (2009) Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 60:1320–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahadur AV, Ibrahim M, Tanner T (2013) Characterising resilience: unpacking the concept for tackling climate change and development. Clim Dev 5:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry RG, Hall-McKim EA (2014) Essentials of the Earth’s climate system. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt JR, Leslie HM (2013) Resilience to climate change in coastal marine ecosystems. Annu Rev Mar Sci 5:371–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börner K (2010) Atlas of science: visualizing what we know. MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd E, Juhola S (2015) Adaptive climate change governance for urban resilience. Urban Stud 52:1234–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busayo ET, Kalumba AM (2020) Coastal climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction: a review of policy, programme and practice for sustainable planning outcomes. Sustainability 12:e6450

  • Brace C, Geoghegan H (2011) Human geographies of climate change: landscape, temporality, and lay knowledges. Prog Hum Geogr 35:284–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahlik T (2000) Search for fundamental articles in economics. Scientometrics 49:389–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon M, Courtial JJP, Turner WA, Bauin S (1983) From translations to problematic networks- an introduction to co-word analysis. Soc Sci Inf 22:191–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon M, Courtial JP, Laville F (1991) Co-words analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics 22:153–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter (2014) The politics of climate change in the UK. Wires Clim Change 5:423–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S, Newton AC (2011) Climate change, plant diseases and food security: an overview. Plant Pathol 60:2–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H et al (2013) The impacts of climate change and human activities on biogeochemical cycles on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Global Change Biol 19:2940–2955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Wang L, Niu Z, Zhang M, Li CA, Li J (2020) The effects of projected climate change and extreme climate on maize and rice in the Yangtze River Basin, China. Agr Forest Meteorol 282:e107867

  • Cook J, Nuccitelli D, Green SA, Richardson M, Winkler B, Painting R, Way R, Jacobs P, Skuce A (2013) Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ Res Lett 8:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai SL, Duan X, Zhang W (2020) Knowledge map of environmental crisis management based on keywords network and co-word analysis, 2005–2018. J Clean Prod 262:8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Oliveira JAP (2009) The implementation of climate change related policies at the subnational level: an analysis of three countries. Habitat Int 33:253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Sario M, Katsouyanni K, Michelozzi P (2013) Climate change, extreme weather events, air pollution and respiratory health in Europe. Eur Respir J 42:826–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebi KL et al (2021) Extreme weather and climate change: population health and health system implications. Annu Rev Publ Health 42:293–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang Y, Yin J, Wu BH (2018) Climate change and tourism: a scientometric analysis using CiteSpace. J Sustain Tour 26:108–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu HZ, Wang MH, Ho YS (2013) Mapping of drinking water research: a bibliometric analysis of research output during 1992–2011. Sci Total Environ 443:757–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Rio F, Serrano S, Dorgham A, Alvarez-Sala R, Pena AR, Pino JM, Alvarez-Sala JL, Villamor J (2001) A bibliometric evaluation of European Union research of the respiratory system from 1987 to 1998. Eur Respir J 17:1175–1180

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng DY, Feng YT, Zhu QH (2020) Sustainable design for users: a literature review and bibliometric analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:29824–29836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillard R (2016) Unravelling the United Kingdom’s climate policy consensus: the power of ideas, discourse and institutions. Glob Environ Chang 40:26–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment (2019) National laws and policies on climate change adaptation: a global review. Available at https://climate-laws.org. Accessed 20 Mar 2021

  • Haunschild R, Bornmann L, Marx W (2016) Climate change research in view of bibliometrics. PLoS ONE 11:19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidrich O et al (2016) National climate policies across Europe and their impacts on cities strategies. J Environ Manage 168:36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou Q, Mao GZ, Zhao L, Du HB, Zuo J (2015) Mapping the scientific research on life cycle assessment: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:541–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang L, Chen K, Zhou M (2020) Climate change and carbon sink: a bibliometric analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:8740–8758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx JC (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA

  • IPCC (2020) About the IPCC. Available at https://www.ipcc.ch/about/. Accessed 19 Mar 2020

  • IPCC (2021) Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In Press. Available at https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_SPM_final.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2021

  • Janko F, Vancso JP, Moricz N (2017) Is climate change controversy good for science? IPCC and contrarian reports in the light of bibliometrics. Scientometrics 112:1745–1759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JMF, Franzluebbers AJ, Weyers SL, Reicosky DC (2007) Agricultural opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Environ Pollut 150:107–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang SC, Xu YW, You QL, Flugel WA, Pepin N, Yao TD (2010) Review of climate and cryospheric change in the Tibetan Plateau. Environ Res Lett 5:15101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinberg J (2003) Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Data Min Knowl Disc 7:373–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee B, Jeong YI (2008) Mapping Korea’s national R&D domain of robot technology by using the co-word analysis. Scientometrics 77:3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li JF, Wang MH, Ho YS (2011) Trends in research on global climate change: a Science Citation Index Expanded-based analysis. Global Planet Change 77:13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Zhou H, Huang DS, Guan P (2020a) Global research output and theme trends on climate change and infectious diseases: a restrospective bibliometric and co-word biclustering investigation of papers indexed in PubMed (1999–2018). Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:e5228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Zhou M, Shao J, Chen Z, Wei X, Yang J (2020b) Maize, wheat and rice production potential changes in China under the background of climate change. Agric Syst 182:e102853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima CO, Bonetti J (2020) Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production on coastal communities’ social vulnerability to climate change and to the impact of extreme events. Nat Hazards 102(3):1589–1610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni I, Benson D (2014) Radical institutional change in environmental governance: explaining the origins of the UK Climate Change Act 2008 through discursive and streams perspectives. Glob Environ Chang 29:10–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maibach E, Myers T, Leiserowitz A (2014) Climate scientists need to set the record straight: there is a scientific consensus that human-caused climate change is happening. Earths Future 2:295–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mane KK, Börner K (2004) Mapping topics and topic bursts in PNAS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:5287–5290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marrone M (2020) Application of entity linking to identify research fronts and trends. Scientometrics 122:357–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx W, Haunschild R, Thor A, Bornmann L (2017) Which early works are cited most frequently in climate change research literature? A bibliometric approach based on Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy. Scientometrics 110:335–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley JR, O’malley R, Ojima DS (2009) A review of climate-change adaptation strategies for wildlife management and biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 23:1080–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumby PJ, Wolff NH, Bozec YM, Chollett I, Halloran P (2014) Operationalizing the resilience of coral reefs in an era of climate change. Conserv Lett 7:176–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najera-Sanchez JJ (2020) A systematic review of sustainable banking through a co-word analysis. Sustainability-Basel 12:23

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin F, Pinski G, Gee HH (1976) Structure of biomedical literature. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 27:24–45

    Google Scholar 

  • NASA (2020) Global temperature. New York, USA. Available at https://climate.nasa.gov. Accessed 19 Mar 2021

  • Olivier JGJ, Peters JAHW (2018) Trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions: 2018 report. The Hague

  • Panteli M, Mancarella P (2015) Influence of extreme weather and climate change on the resilience of power systems: impacts and possible mitigation strategies. Electr Pow Syst Res 127:259–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry M, Rosenzweig C, Livermore M (2005) Climate change, and risk global food supply of hunger. Philos Trans R Soc B-Biol Sci 360:2125–2138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prather CM, Pelini SL, Laws A, Rivest E, Woltz M, Bloch CP, Del Toro I, Ho CK, Kominoski J, Scottnewbold TA, Parsons S, Joern A (2013) Invertebrates, ecosystem services and climate change. Biol Rev 88:327–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana IA (2020) Disaster and climate change resilience: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Disast Risk Re 50:e101839

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangam SL, Savitha KS (2019) Climate change and global warming: a scientometric study. Collnet J Scientometr Inf Manage 13:199–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite D (2013) The political underpinnings of cities’ accumulated resilience to climate change. Environ Urban 25:381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper ELF (2009) Meeting at the crossroads?: Exploring the linkages between climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. Clim Dev 1:16–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwechheimer H, Winterhager M (1999) Highly dynamic specialities in climate research. Scientometrics 44:547–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sci2 Team (2009) Science of science (Sci2) tool. Indiana University and SciTech Strategies. Available at https://sci2.cns.iu.edu. Accessed 19 Mar 2021

  • Stanhill G (2001) The growth of climate change science: a scientometric study. Clim Change 48:515–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State Council of China (2019) Food security in China. The state council information office of the People’s Republic of China. Available at http://www.scio.gov.cn/zfbps/32832/Document/1666228/1666228.htm. Accessed 18 Mar 2021

  • Statista (2020) Available at https://www.statista.com/statistics/255971/top-countries-based-on-rice-consumption-2012-2013/#statisticContainer. Accessed 18 Mar 2021

  • Stevens-Rumann CS, Kemp KB, Higuera PE, Harvey BJ, Rother MT, Donato DC, Morgan P, Veblen TT (2018) Evidence for declining forest resilience to wildfires under climate change. Ecol Lett 21:243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sustainable Prosperity (2012) The United Kingdom (UK). Climate policy: Lessons for Canada. Policy Brief. Available at https://institute.smartprosperity.ca/sites/default/files/publications/files/TheUnitedKingdomClimatePolicyLessonsforCanada.pdf. Accessed 18 Mar 2021

  • Swar B, Khan GF (2014) Mapping ICT knowledge infrastructure in South Asia. Scientometrics 99:117–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of Cmip5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:485–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Salinas D, Lopez-Cózar ED, Jiménez-Contreras E (2009) Ranking of departments and researchers within a university using two different databases: web of Science versus Scopus. Scientometrics 80:761–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE, Hoar TJ (1997) El Niño and climate change. Geophys Res Lett 24:3057–3060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2009) Available at https://unfccc.int/process/conferences/pastconferences/copenhagen-climate-change-conference-december-2009/statements-and-resources/information-provided-by-parties-to-the-convention-relating-to-the-copenhagen-accord. Accessed 15 Mar 2021

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2020a) Available at https://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol on 16 March, 2021

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2020b) Available at https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement. Accessed 18 Mar 2021

  • United Nations (1992) United Nations framework convention on climate change. Available at https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf. Accessed 18 Mar 2021

  • United Nations (2020) Climate change. Available at https://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/climate-change/index.html. Accessed 19 Mar 2022

  • van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84:523–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2011) Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ISSI Newsletter 7:50–54

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2014) Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: Ding Y, Rousseau R, Wolfram D (eds) Measuring scholarly impact: methods and practice. Springer, pp 285–320

    Google Scholar 

  • van Raan AF, Tijssen RJW (1993) The neural net of neural network research. Scientometrics 26:169–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergidis PI, Karavasiou AI, Paraschakis K, Bliziotis IA, Falagas ME (2005) Bibliometric analysis of global trends for research productivity in microbiology. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 24:342–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Pan SY, Ke RY, Wang K, Wei YM (2014) An overview of climate change vulnerability: a bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science database. Nat Hazards 74:1649–1666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZH, Zhao YD, Wang B (2018) A bibliometric analysis of climate change adaptation based on massive research literature data. J Clean Prod 199:1072–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu F, Geng Y, Tian X, Zhong S, Wu W, Yu S, Xiao S (2018) Responding climate change: a bibliometric review on urban environmental governance. J Clean Prod 204:344–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang K, Wu H, Qin J, Lin CG, Tang WJ, Chen YY (2014) Recent climate changes over the Tibetan Plateau and their impacts on energy and water cycle: a review. Global Planet Change 112:79–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao F, Xu Y, Lin E, Yokozawa M, Zhang J (2007) Assessing the impacts of climate change on rice yields in the main rice areas of China. Clim Change 80:395–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh SW, Kug JS, Dewitte B, Kwon MH, Kirtman BP, Jin FF (2009) El Niño in a changing climate. Nature 461:511-U70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zyoud SH, Fuchs-Hanusch D (2020) Mapping of climate change research in the Arab world: a bibliometric analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:3523–3540

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71804163).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Hui-Zhen Fu: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, visualization, software, writing-original draft preparation, funding acquisition. Ludo Waltman: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, software, writing-reviewing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui-Zhen Fu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Our research did not involve any human participants or animals.

Consent to participate

All the authors have agreed for authorship, read and approved the manuscript.

Consent for publication

All the authors have given consent for submission and subsequent publication of the manuscript in Climatic Change.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 417 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fu, HZ., Waltman, L. A large-scale bibliometric analysis of global climate change research between 2001 and 2018. Climatic Change 170, 36 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03324-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03324-z

Keywords

Navigation