Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluations of NASA NEX-GDDP data over Southeast Asia: present and future climates

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluates the National Aeronautics Space Administration (NASA) Earth Exchange Global Daily Downscaled Projections (NEX-GDDP) dataset that provides statistically downscaled CMIP5 historical and future climate projections (precipitation and temperature), at high spatial (25 km) and temporal (daily) resolutions. The study is performed over Southeast Asia for the historical period 1976–2005 and compared against gridded observations on daily scales. Future climate change is assessed over the future time slices, 2020–2050 and 2070–2099, under two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) scenarios 4.5 and 8.5 with respect to 1976–2005. The future climate projections indicate that surface temperatures over Southeast Asia are likely to increase by more than 3.5 °C by the end of the century. As to precipitation, both the mean and extreme rainfall are likely to increase but the biases in the historical simulations could contribute to larger uncertainties in the estimates of rainfall projections. Findings of the study indicate that NEX-GDDP are in good agreement with observations over the historical period only on monthly scales and that they do not capture the observed statistics on daily scales which suggests that these data need a deeper scrutiny on daily scales, especially when used for impacts studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam JC, Lettenmaier DP (2003) Adjustment of global gridded precipitation for systematic bias. J Geophys Res 108:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao Y, Wen X (2017) Projection of China’s near- and long-term climate in a new high-resolution daily downscaled dataset NEX-GDDP. J Meteorol Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-017-6106-6

  • Bosshard T, Carambia M, Goergen K, Kotlarski S, Krahe P, Zappa M, Schar C (2013) Quantifying uncertainty sources in an ensemble of hydrological climate-impact projections. Water Resour Res 49:1523–1536. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chotamonsak C, Salathé EP Jr, Kreasuwan J, Chantara S, Siriwitayakorn K (2011) Projected climate change over Southeast Asia simulated using a WRF regional climate model. Atmos Sci Let 12:213–219

  • Christensen JH, Carter TR, Rummukainen M, Amanatidis G (2006) Evaluating the performance and utility of regional climate models: the PRUDENCE project. Clim Chang 81(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufresne et al (2013) Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5. Clim Dyn 40:2123–2165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgetta et al (2013) Climate and carbon cycle changes from 1850 to 2100 in MPI-ESM simulations for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5. J Adv Model Earth Syst 5:572–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F (1990) Simulations of regional climate using a limited area model nested in a general circulation model. J Clim 3(9):941–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris I, Jones PD, Osborn TJ, Lister DH (2014) Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations - the CRU TS310 dataset. Int. J Clim 25(3):623–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitson BC, Crane RG (2006) Consensus between GCM climate change projections with empirical downscaling: precipitation downscaling over South Africa. Int J Climatol 26(10):1315–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch RM, Slack JR, Smith RA (1982) Techniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data. Water Resour Res 18(1):107–121. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR018i001p00107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho TMH, Phan VT, Le NQ, Nguyen QT (2011) Extreme climatic events over Vietnam from observational data and RegCM3 projections. Clim Res 49:87–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hur J, Raghavan SV, Nguyen NS, Liong SY (2017) Are satellite products good proxies for gauge precipitation over Singapore? Theor Appl Climatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2132-7

  • IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob D, Petersen J, Eggert B et al (2014) EURO-CORDEX: new high-resolution climate change projections for European impact research. Reg Environ Change 14(2):563–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MG (1975) Rank correlation methods, 4th edn. Charles Griffin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann HB (1945) Non-parametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13:245–259. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maraun D, Widmann M (2018) Statistical downscaling and bias correction for climate research. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107588783

  • Maurer EP, Adam JC, Wood AW (2009) Climate model based consensus on the hydrologic impacts of climate change to the Rio Lempa basin of Central America. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEACAM (2014) A regional climate modelling experiment for Southeast Asia, technical report initiated by the Centre for Climate Research Singapore of the Meteorological Service Singapore (CCRS-MSS) in collaboration with the Met Office Hadley Centre (MOHC), UK

  • Sheffield J, Goteti G, Wood EF (2006) Development of a 50-year high-resolution global dataset of meteorological forcings for land surface modeling. J Clim 19:3088–3111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shongwe ME, Lennard C, Liebmann B, Kalognomou E-A, Ntsangwane L, Pinto I (2015) An evaluation of CORDEX regional climate models in simulating precipitation over Southern Africa. Atmos Sci Lett 16(3):199–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siew JH, Tangang FT, Juneng L (2014) Evaluation of CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation models and projections of the Southeast Asian winter monsoon in the 21st century. Int J Clim 34:287–2884

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor KE (2001) Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. J Geophys Res: Atmos 106(D7):7183–7192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrasher B, Maurer EP, McKellar C, Duffy PB (2012) Technical note: bias correcting climate model simulated daily temperature extremes with quantile mapping. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16(9):3309–3314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trzaska S, Schnarr E (2014) A review for downscaling methods for climate change projections. USAID report by the Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), 45 pp

  • Voldorie et al (2013) The CNRM-CM5.1 global climate model: description and basic evaluation. Clim Dyn 40:2091–2121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe et al (2010) Improved climate simulation by MIROC5: mean states, variability, and climate sensitivity. J Clim 23:6312–6335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukimoto et al (2012) A new global climate model of the Meteorological Research Institute: MRI-CGCM3–model description and basic performance. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 90A:23–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jina Hur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raghavan, S.V., Hur, J. & Liong, SY. Evaluations of NASA NEX-GDDP data over Southeast Asia: present and future climates. Climatic Change 148, 503–518 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2213-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2213-3

Navigation