Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Consequences of climate change for the soil climate in Central Europe and the central plains of the United States

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate soil climate quantitatively under present and projected climatic conditions across Central Europe (12.1°–18.9° E and 46.8°–51.1° N) and the U.S. Central Plains (90°–104° W and 37°–49° N), with a special focus on soil temperature, hydric regime, drought risk and potential productivity (assessed as a period suitable for crop growth). The analysis was completed for the baselines (1961–1990 for Europe and 1985–2005 for the U.S.) and time horizons of 2025, 2050 and 2100 based on the outputs of three global circulation models using two levels of climate sensitivity. The results indicate that the soil climate (soil temperature and hydric soil regimes) will change dramatically in both regions, with significant consequences for soil genesis. However, the predicted changes of the pathways are very uncertain because of the range of future climate systems predicted by climate models. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that the risk of unfavourable dry years will increase, resulting in greater risk of soil erosion and lower productivity. The projected increase in the variability of dry and wet events combined with the uncertainty (particularly in the U.S.) poses a challenge for selecting the most appropriate adaptation strategies and for setting adequate policies. The results also suggest that the soil resources are likely be under increased pressure from changes in climate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen GA, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements, Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. FAO, Rome, 300 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • D´Odorico P, Porporato A (2004) Preferential states in soil moisture and climate dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:8848–8851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dokučhaev VV (1883) Russian Chernozem. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem 1967

  • Dubrovský M, Buchtele J, Zalud Z (2004) High-frequency and low-frequency variability in stochastic daily weather generator and its effect on agricultural and hydrologic modelling. Clim Chang 63:145–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubrovský M, Nemešová I, Kalvová J (2005) Uncertainties in climate change scenarios for the Czech Republic. Clim Res 29:139–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckmeier E, Gerlach R, Gehrt E, Schmidt MWI (2007) Pedogenesis of chernozems in Central Europe-a review. Geoderma 139:288–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H (1974) Zeigerwerte der Gefäßpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Scr Geobotanica 9, 97 pp

  • Fanning DS, Fanning MCB (1989) Soil morphology, genesis and classification. Wiley, New York, 395 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr TG, Rrosen P, Caro E et al (2007) The Shuttle radar topography Mission. Rev Geophys 45, RG2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer G, van Velthuizen H, Shah M, Nachtergaele F, (2002) Global agro-ecological assessment for agriculture in the 21st century: methodology and results, IIASA, (http://webarchive.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/PUB/Documents/RR-02-002.pdf)

  • Gray JM, Humphreys GS, Deckers JA (2009) Relationships in soil distribution as revealed by a global soil database. Geoderma 150:309–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey LDD, Gregory J, Hoffert M et al (1997) An introduction to simple climate models used in the IPCC Second Assessment Report. IPCC Tech Paper 2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds) (2005) Millenium ecosystem assessment, volume I. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends: findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group, 917 pp

  • Hirschi M, Seneviratne SI, Alexandrov V, Boberg F, Boroneant C, Christensen OB, Formayer H, Orlowsky B, Stepanek P (2010) Observational evidence for soil-moisture impact on hot extremes in southeastern Europe. Nat Geosci 4:17–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hlavinka P, Trnka M, Balek J et al (2011) Development and evaluation of the SoilClim model for water balance and soil climate estimates. Agric Water Manag 98:1249–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homer C, Huang C, Yang L, Wylie B, Coan M (2004) Development of a 2001 national landcover database for the United States. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 70:829–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme M, Wigley TML, Barrow EM, Raper SCB, Centella A, Smith S, Chipanshi AC (2000) Using a climate scenario generator for vulnerability and adaptation assessments: MAGICC and SCENGEN Version 2.4 Workbook. Climatic Research Unit, Norwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenny H (1941) Factors of soil formation-a system of quantitative pedology. McGraw-Hill, New York, 281 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenny H (1961) Derivation of state factor equations of soils and ecosystems. Proc Soil Sci Soc Am 25:385–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones A, Stolbovoy V, Rusco E, Gentile AR, Gardi C, Marechal B, Montanarella L (2009) Climate change in Europe. W. Impact on soils. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 29:423–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruijt B, Witte JPM, Jacobs CMJ, Kroon T (2008) Effects of rising atmospheric CO2 on evapotranspiration and soil moisture: a practical approach for the Netherlands. J Hydrol 349:257–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang R (1920) Verwitterung und Bodenbildung als Einführung in die Bodenkunde, Stuttgart

  • Larcher W (2003) Physiological plant ecology, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin, 513 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marbut CF (1928) A scheme for soil classification. 1st Internal. Cong Soil Sci Comm 5, Proc Papers 4:1–31, illus

  • Marbut CF (1935) Soils of the United States. In U.S. Dept. of Agric. atlas of American agriculture, pt. III. Advance Sheets, No. 8., 98 pp., illus

  • Miller DA, White RA (1998) A conterminous United States multi-layer soil characteristics data set for regional climate and hydrology modeling. Earth Interact 2. [Available on-line at http://EarthInteractions.org]

  • Mitchell TD (2003) Pattern scaling. An examination of the accuracy of the technique for describing future climates. Clim Change 60:217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munson SM, Belnap J, Okin GS (2011) Responses of wind erosion to climate-induced vegetation changes on the Colorado Plateau. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:3854–3859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murer E, Wagenhofer J, Pfeffer M (2004) Die nutzbare Feldkapazität der mineralischen Böden der landwirtschaftlichen nutzf läche Österreichs. Schriftenreihe BaW 20:72–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Novák V (1921) Vztahy mezi podnebím a půdou se zřetelem ku půdám Čech (Relationship bewteen climate and soil with regard to soils in Bohemia). In: Czech with German and French resumes; Prague, 140 pp

  • Orchard VA, Cook FJ (1983) Relationship between soil respiration and soil moisture. Soil Biol Biochem 15:447–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelíšek J (1966) Altitudinal zonation of soils in Central Europe (In. Czech). Academia, Prague, p 368

    Google Scholar 

  • Rounsevell M, Evans SP, Bullock P (1999) Climate change and agricultural soils: impacts and adaptation. Clim Chang 43:683–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santer BD, Wigley TML, Schlesinger ME, Mitchell JFB (1990) Developing climate scenarios from equilibrium GCM results. Report no.47. Max Planck Institute für Meteorologie, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaetzl RJ, Anderson S (2005) Soils genesis and geomorphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 817

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seneviratne SI, Lüthi D, Litschi M, Schär C (2006) Land–atmosphere coupling and climate change in Europe. Nature 443:205–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seneviratne SI, Corti T, Davin EL et al (2010) Investigating soil moisture-climate interactions in a changing climate: a review. Earth Sci Rev 99:125–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar MVK, Stefanski R (2006) Climate and land degradation—an overview. International Workshop on Climate and Land Degradation. Clim Land Degrad 105–135. Arusha, Tanzania

  • Soil Atlas of Europe (2005) European soil bureau network, European Commission, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, L-2995 Luxembourg, EUR-216766 128 pp

  • Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M (2007) Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 996 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Teuling AJ, Hirschi M, Ohmura A (2009) A regional perspective on trends in continental evaporation. Geophys Res Lett 36, L02404. doi:10.1029/2008GL036584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomášek M (2007) Soils of the Czech Republic. Czech Geological Service, Prague, 68 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Trnka M, Dubrovsky M, Semeradova D, Zalud Z (2004) Projections of uncertainties in climate change scenarios into expected winter wheat yields. Theor Appl Climatol 77:229–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA-NRCS-Soil Survey Staff (1975) Soil taxonomy. A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. USDA soil conservation service, Agric. Handbook No 436. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA-NRCS-Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil taxonomy, a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. USDA-soil conservation service, agricultural handbook #436, 2nd edn. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, 869pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wambeke A, Hastings P, Tolomeo M (1992) Newhall simulation model—A BASIC Program for the IBM PC (DOS 2.0 or later). Dept. of Agronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Várallyay G (1994) Soil responses to climate change. In: Rounsevell MDA, Loveland PJ (eds) Nata ASI series, 123. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 39–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltman WJ, Ciolkosz EJ, Mausbach MJ, Svoboda MD, Miller DA, Kolb PJ (1997) Soil climate regimes of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Ag Expt Sta Bull 873

  • Waltman WJ, Goddard S, Reichenbach SE, Svoboda MD, Hayes MJ, Peake JS (2003) Patterns and trends of soil climate regimes and drought events in the Northern Great Plains, Proceedings of the Applied Geography Conference. Colorado Springs, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Projects KONTAKT, LH110010 and National Agency for Agricultural Research QI91C054 helped plan and execute this study. Dr. Trnka was supported by the project “Establishment of International Scientific Team Focused on Drought Research” (no. OP VK CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0248). Dr. Dubrovský was supported by the FP 7 project CLIMSAVE (no. 244031). Dr. Hlavinka was supported by project “Partnership in Climate Research and Adaptation Strategies (no. CZ.1.07/2.4.00/31.0056). We would like to thank Deborah Wood(NDMC) for careful language editing of the final version of the paper and to three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miroslav Trnka.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 199 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 1296 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trnka, M., Kersebaum, K.C., Eitzinger, J. et al. Consequences of climate change for the soil climate in Central Europe and the central plains of the United States. Climatic Change 120, 405–418 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0786-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0786-4

Keywords

Navigation