Abstract
We present an approach to assess and compare risk from climate change among multiple species through a risk matrix, in which managers can quickly prioritize for species that need to have strategies developed, evaluated further, or watched. We base the matrix upon earlier work towards the National Climate Assessment for potential damage to infrastructures from climate change. Risk is defined here as the product of the likelihood of an event occurring and the consequences or impact of that event. In the context of species habitats, the likelihood component is related to the potential changes in suitable habitat modeled at various times during this century. Consequences are related to the adaptability of the species to cope with the changes, especially the increasing intensity and/or frequency of disturbance events that are projected. We derived consequence scores from nine biological and 12 disturbance characteristics that were pulled from literature for each species. All data were generated from an atlas of climate change for 134 trees of the eastern United States (www.nrs.fs.fed.us/atlas). We show examples which depict a wide range of risk for tree species of northern Wisconsin, including species that may gain substantial habitat as well as lose substantial habitat, both of which will require the development of strategies to help the ecosystems adapt to such changes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bagne KE, Friggens MM, Finch DM (2011) A System for Assessing Vulnerability of Species (SAVS) to climate change. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-257. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rockey Mountain Research Station, Ft. Collins, p 28
Chen I-C, Hill JK, Ohlemüller R, Roy DB, Thomas CD (2011) Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333:1024–1026
Davis MB, Shaw RG (2001) Range shifts and adaptive responses to quaternary climate change. Science 292:673–679
Davis MB, Zabinski C (1992) Changes in geographical range resulting from greenhouse warming: effects on biodiversity in forests. In: Peters RL, Lovejoy TE (eds) Global warming and biological diversity. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 297–308
DeHayes DH, Jacobson GL, Schaber PG, Bongarten B, Iverson LR, Dieffenbacker-Krall A (2000) Forest responses to changing climate: lessons from the past and uncertainty for the future. In: Mickler RA, Birdsey RA, Hom JL (eds) Responses of northern forests to environmental change. Springer-Verlag, Ecological Studies Series, New York, pp 495–540
Dobrowski SZ, Thorne JH, Greenberg JA, Safford HD, Mynsberge AR, Crimmins SM, Swanson AK (2011) Modeling plant ranges over 75 years of climate change in California, USA: temporal transferability and species traits. Ecol Monogr 81:241–257
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Iverson LR, Prasad AM, Matthews SN, Peters M (2008) Estimating potential habitat for 134 eastern US tree species under six climate scenarios. For Ecol Manag 254:390–406
Iverson L, Prasad AM, Matthews S, Peters M (2011) Lessons learned while integrating habitat, dispersal, disturbance, and life-history traits into species habitat models under climate change. Ecosystems 14:1005–1020
Matthews SN, Iverson LR, Prasad AM, Peters MP (2011a) Potential habitat changes of 147 North American bird species to redistribution of vegetation and climate following predicted climate change. Ecography. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06803.x
Matthews SN, Iverson LR, Prasad AM, Peters MP, Rodewald PG (2011b) Modifying climate change habitat models using tree species-specific assessments of model uncertainty and life history factors. For Ecol Manag 262:1460–1472
MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island, Washington
Millar C, Stephenson NL (2007) Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17:2145–2151
Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, Grübler A, Jung TY, Kram T, Lebre La Rovere E, Michaelis L, Mori S, Morita T, Pepper W, Pitcher H, Price L, Riahi K, Roehrl A, Rogner H, Sankovski A, Schlesinger M, Shukla P, Smith S, Swart R, van Rooijen S, Victor N, Dadi Z (2000) IPCC special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
National Climate Assessment (NCA) (2011) Strategic plan, http://globalchange.gov
National Research Council (NRC) (2010a) Adapting to the impacts of climate change: report of the panel on advancing the science climate change. America’s Climate Choices, National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington, DC. http://www.nas.edu
National Research Council (NRC) (2010b) Advancing the science of climate change: report of the panel on advancing the science climate change. America’s climate choices, National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington, DC. http://www.nas.edu
National Research Council (NRC) (2010c) Informing decisions on climate change: report of the panel on advancing the science climate change. America’s Climate Choices, National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington, DC. http://www.nas.edu
National Research Council (NRC) (2010d) Limiting the magnitude of future climate change: report of the panel on advancing the science climate change. America’s Climate Choices, National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington, DC. http://www.nas.edu
National Research Council (NRC) (2011) Report of the committee on Americas climate choices. America’s climate choices, National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington, DC. http://www.nas.edu
New York City Panel on Climate Change(NPCC) (2009) Climate change adaptation in New York city: building a risk management response. In: Rosenzweig C, Solecki W (eds) Prepared for use by the New York City Climate Change Adaptation Task Force, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, New York, NY, pp. 349, http://www.nyas.org
Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42
Poland TM, McCullough DG (2006) Emerald Ash Borer: invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America’s ash resource. J Forest 104:118–124
Pope VD (2000) The impact of new physical parameterizations in the Hadley Centre climate model–HadCM3. Clim Dyn 16:123–146
Prasad AP, Iverson LR, Matthews SN, Peters MP (2009) Atlases of tree and bird species habitats for current and future climates. Ecol Restor 27:260–263
Prasad A, Iverson L, Peters M, Bossenbroek J, Matthews SN, Sydnor D, Schwartz M (2010) Modeling the invasive emerald ash borer risk of spread using a spatially explicit cellular model. Landsc Ecol 25:353–369
Raiffa H, Schlaiffer R (2000) Applied statistical decision theory. Wiley Classics, New York
Swanston CW, Janowiak MK (eds) (2012) Forest adaptation resources: climate change tools and approaches for land managers. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-XX. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, p 108
Swanston C, Janowiak M, Iverson L, Parker L, Mladenoff D, Brandt L, Butler P, St. Pierre M, Prasad AM, Matthews S, Peters M, Higgins D (2011) Ecosystem vulnerability assessment and synthesis: a report from the climate change response framework project in northern Wisconsin. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, p 142
Washington WM, Weatherly JW, Meehl GA, Semtner A Jr, Bettge TW, Craig AP, Strand WG Jr, Arblaster JM, Wayland VB, James R, Zhang Y (2000) Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations. Clim Dyn 16:755–774
Webb TI (1992) Past changes in vegetation and climate: lessons for the future. In: Peters RL, Lovejoy TE (eds) Global warming and biological diversity. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 59–75
Yohe G (2010) Risk assessment and risk management for infrastructure planning and investment. The Bridge Fall: 14–21
Yohe G, Leichenko R (2010) Adopting a risk-based approach. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1196:29–40
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the US Forest Service, Northern Research Station and their Global Change Program for supporting this research. We are also indebted to the National Climate Assessment team for their encouragement and ideas related to this approach to risk assessment. Thanks to Linda Joyce, Daniel McKenney, and David Peterson for providing valuable technical comments to an earlier draft. Thanks also to the reviewers and editors responsible for improving the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 31 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iverson, L.R., Matthews, S.N., Prasad, A.M. et al. Development of risk matrices for evaluating climatic change responses of forested habitats. Climatic Change 114, 231–243 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0412-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0412-x