Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Statistical dependence in input data of national greenhouse gas inventories: effects on the overall inventory uncertainty

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An uncertainty assessment of the Austrian greenhouse gas inventory provided the basis for this analysis. We isolated the factors that were responsible for the uncertainty observed, and compared our results with those of other countries. Uncertainties of input parameters were used to derive the uncertainty of the emission estimate. Resulting uncertainty using a Monte Carlo approach was 5.2% for the emission levels of 2005 and 2.4 percentage points for the 1990–2005 emission trend. Systematic uncertainty was not assessed. This result is in the range expected from previous experience in Austria and other countries. The determining factor for the emission level uncertainty (not the trend uncertainty) is the uncertainty associated with soil nitrous oxide N2O emissions. Uncertainty of the soil N2O release rate is huge, and there is no agreement even on the magnitude of the uncertainty when country comparisons are made. In other words, reporting and use of N2O release uncertainty are also different between countries; this is important, as this single factor fully determines a country’s national greenhouse gas inventory uncertainty. Inter-country comparisons of emission uncertainty are thus unable to reveal much about a country’s inventory quality. For Austria, we also compared the results of the Monte Carlo approach to those obtained from a simpler error propagation approach, and find the latter to systematically provide lower uncertainty. The difference can be explained by the ability of the Monte Carlo approach to account for statistical dependency of input parameters, again regarding soil N2O emissions. This is in contrast to the results of other countries, which focus less on statistical dependency when performing Monte Carlo analysis. In addition, the error propagation results depend on treatment of skewed probability distributions, which need to be translated into normal distributions. The result indicates that more attention needs to be given to identifying statistically dependent input data in uncertainty assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baggott SL, Brown L, Milne R et al (2005) UK greenhouse gas inventory 1990 to 2003. Annual report for submission under the Framework Convention on Climate Change. AEA Technology, Didcot

  • Baggott SL, Cardenas L, Garnett E et al (2007) UK greenhouse gas inventory 1990 to 2005. Annual report for submission under the Framework Convention on Climate Change, Report AEAT/ENV/R/2429. AEA Technology, Didcot

  • Charles D, Jones BMR, Salway AG et al (1998) Treatment of uncertainties for national estimates of greenhouse gas emissions, AEAT-2688-1. AEA Technology, Culham

  • IPCC (2000) Good practice guidance and uncertainty management in national greenhouse gas inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Hayama

  • IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. In: Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) IGES, Hayama (prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme)

  • Leip A (2010) Quantitative quality assessment of the greenhouse gas inventory for agriculture in Europe. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9915-5

  • Lieberman D, Jonas M, Winiwarter W et al (2007) Accounting for climate change: introduction. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 7:421–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MNP (2006) Greenhouse gas emissions in the Netherlands 1990–2004. National Inventory Report 2006, MNP report 500080 001. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven

  • Monni S, Syri S, Savolainen I (2004) Uncertainties in the Finnish greenhouse gas emission inventory. Environ Sci Policy 7(2):87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahorski Z, Horabik J (2010) Compliance and emission trading rules for nonsymmetric emission uncertainty estimates. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9916-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Orthofer R (1991) Abschätzung der Methan-Emissionen in Österreich, report OEFZS-4586. Forschungszentrum Seibersdorf, Seibersdorf

  • Ramirez A, de Keizer C, van der Sluijs JP et al (2008) Monte Carlo analysis of uncertainties in the Netherlands greenhouse gas emission inventory for 1990–2004. Atmos Environ 42:8263–8272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rypdal K, Winiwarter W (2001) Uncertainties in greenhouse gas inventories—evaluation, comparability and implications. Environ Sci Policy 4:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Finland (2007) Greenhouse gas emissions in Finland 1990–2005. National Inventory Report to the UNFCCC. Statistics Finland, Helsinki

  • Theloke J, Pfeiffer H, Pregger T et al (2007) Development of a methodology for temporal and spatial resolution of greenhouse gas emission inventories for validation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on uncertainty in greenhouse gas inventories, 27–28 September 2007. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, pp 203–208

  • Umweltbundesamt (2007) Austria’s National Inventory Report 2007, submission under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Report REP-0084, Umweltbundesamt, Vienna, Austria

  • US EPA (2007) Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2005. USEPA #430-R-07-002. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington

  • Winiwarter W (2007) National greenhouse gas inventories: understanding uncertainties vs. potential for improving reliability. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 7:443–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Winiwarter W (2008) Quantifying uncertainties of the Austrian Greenhouse Gas Inventory. Report ARC-sys-0154. Austrian Research Centers GmbH-ARC, Vienna. Available at http://systemsresearch.ac.at/FTP/winiwarter/papers/ARC_sys_0154.pdf. Accessed 9 November 2009

  • Winiwarter W, Köther T (2008) Uncertainty related to Luxembourg’s National Greenhouse Gas Inventory. Report ARC-sys-0162. Austrian Research Centers GmbH-ARC, Vienna. Available at http://systemsresearch.ac.at/FTP/winiwarter/papers/ARC_sys_0162.pdf Accessed 9 November 2009

  • Winiwarter W, Orthofer R (2000) Unsicherheit der Emissionsinventur für Treibhausgase in Österreich. Seibersdorf Research Report OEFZS-S-0072, Österreichisches Forschungszentrum Seibersdorf GmbH, Seibersdorf (Austria). Available at http://systemsresearch.ac.at/FTP/winiwarter/papers/arcs0072.pdf. Accessed 9 November 2009

  • Winiwarter W, Rypdal K (2001) Assessing the uncertainty associated with national greenhouse gas emission inventories: a case study for Austria. Atmos Environ 35:5425–5440

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wilfried Winiwarter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winiwarter, W., Muik, B. Statistical dependence in input data of national greenhouse gas inventories: effects on the overall inventory uncertainty. Climatic Change 103, 19–36 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9921-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9921-7

Keywords

Navigation