Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The new global growth path: implications for climate change analysis and policy

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years the world has moved to a new path of rapid global growth, largely driven by the developing countries, which is energy intensive and heavily reliant on the use of coal—global coal use will rise by nearly 60% over the decade to 2010. It is likely that, without changes to the policies in place in 2006, global CO2 emissions from fuel combustion would nearly double their 2000 level by 2020 and would continue to rise beyond 2030. Neither the SRES marker scenarios nor the reference cases assembled in recent studies using integrated assessment models capture this abrupt shift to rapid growth based on fossil fuels, centred in key Asian countries. While policy changes must and will occur, the realism of the reference case is critical for analysis and policy formulation. Using such a reference path will have significant effects on impact and damage estimates, on the analysis of achievable stabilisation paths and on estimates of the costs of achieving stabilisation at a given GHG concentration level. Use of a realistic reference path is also essential for the international negotiations, arising out of the COP13 meeting in Bali, to achieve widely desired stabilisation goals: both the level of emission reductions to be achieved, and the preferred distribution of those reductions over countries and regions, will be heavily influenced by the reference case assumed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews-Speed P (2004) Energy policy and regulation in China. Kluwer Law International, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk MM, den Elzen MJ (2001) Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy: how to realise timely participation to meet stringent climate goals. Climate Policy 1:465–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard O et al (2003) Efficiency with equity: a pragmatic approach. In: Kaul I, Conceição P, Le Goulven K, Mendoza RU (eds) Providing public goods: managing globalization. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhringer C, Löschel A (2005) Climate policy beyond Kyoto: Quo vadis? A computable general equlibrium analysis based on expert judgements. Kyklos 58(4):467–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhringer C, Welsch H (2006) Burden sharing in a greenhouse: egalitarianism and sovereignty reconciled. Appl Econ 38:981–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen JC, Manders AJG, Veenendaal PJJ (2004) How much does a 30% emission reduction cost? Macroeconomic effects of post-Kyoto climate policy in 2020. CPB Document no 64. Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • British Petroleum (BP) (2003) Statistical review of world energy 2003. British Petroleum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • British Petroleum (BP) (2007) Statistical review of world energy 2007. British Petroleum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles I, Henderson D (2003) The IPCC emission scenarios: an economic–statistical critique. Energy Environ 14(2–3):159–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) (2007) Understanding China’s energy policy: economic growth and energy use, fuel diversity, energy/carbon intensity and international cooperation. Background paper prepared for Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. Research Centre for Sustainable Development, CASS, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke L et al (2007) Scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric concentrations@ Sub-report 2.1A of Synthesis and Assessment Product 2.1, U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Criqui P, Kourvaritakis N (2000) World energy projections to 2030. Int J Glob Energy Issues 14:116–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Criqui P et al (2003) Greenhouse gas reduction pathways in the UNFCCC process up to 2025. Technical Report Study Contract B4-3040/2001/325703/MAR/E1 for the European Commission, DG Environment, Brussels

  • Dai Y, Zhu Y (2005) China’s energy demand scenarios to 2020: impact analysis of policy options on China’s future energy demand. Int J Glob Energy 24(3/4):131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • den Elzen MGJ, Lucas P (2005) The FAIR model: a tool to analyse environmental and costs implications of climate regimes. Environ Model Assess 10(2):115–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • den Elzen MGJ, Meinshausen M (2005) Meeting the EU 2°C climate target: global and regional emission implications. MNP Report 728001031/2005. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • den Elzen MGJ, Meinshausen M (2006) Multi-gas emission pathways for meeting the EU 2°C climate target. In: Schellnhuber HJ et al (ed) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • den Elzen MGJ, Lucas P, Van Vuuren DP (2005) Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes. Energy Policy 33(16):2138–2151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Energy US (DOE) (2001/2007) International energy outlook. Department of Energy US, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbaccio RF, Ho MS, Jorgenson DW (1999) Why has the energy-output ratio fallen in China? Energy J 20(3):63–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenenberg H, Blok K, Van der Sluijs J (2004) Global Triptych: a bottom-up approach for the differentiation of commitments under the Climate Convention. Climate Policy 4(4):153–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J et al (2000) Global warming in the twenty-first century: an alternative scenario. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97(18):9875–9880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höhne N et al (2005) Options for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol. Federal Environment Agency, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhne N (2006) What is next after the Kyoto Protocol: assessment of options for international climate policy post 2012. Techne, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA) (2006a) World energy statistics and balances, and CO2 emissions from fuel combustion. Paris. http://data.iea.org/ieastore/statslisting.asp. Cited 23 July 2007

  • IEA (2006b) World energy outlook 2006. IEA, Paris

  • IEA (2007) World energy outlook 2007. IEA, Paris

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF) (various years to 2007) World economic outlook. Washington DC

  • Lin X, Polenske KR (1995) Input–output anatomy of China’s energy use changes in the 1980s. Econ Syst Res 7(1):67–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinshausen M (2006) What does a 2°C target mean for greenhouse gas concentrations? A brief analysis based on multi-gas emission pathways and several climate sensitivity uncertainty estimates. In: Schellnhuber H et al (ed) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinshausen M et al (2006) Multi-gas emissions pathways to meet climate targets. Clim Change 75(1–2):151–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelowa A, Tangen K, Hasselknippe H (2005) Issues and options for the post-2012 climate architecture: an overview. International Environmental Agreements 5(1):5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakiçenovic N, Swart R (eds) (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Nakiçenovic N et al (2003) IPCC SRES revisited: a response. Energy Environ 14(2–3):187–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau Statistics China (NBSC) (2007a) Statistical communiqué on the 2006 national economic and social development. 28 February. Beijing. http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/newsandcomingevents/t20070301_402388091.htm. Cited 23 July 2007

  • NBSC (2007b) National economy kept steady and fast growth in the first half of 2007. 19 July. Beijing. http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/newsandcomingevents/t20070719_402418974.htm. Cited 24 July 2007

  • NBSC (2007c) Value-added of industry expanded in the first half year. 23 July, Beijing

  • National Development Research Centre (NDRC) (2004) China national energy strategy and policy to 2020. Subtitle 2: scenario analysis on energy demand. Beijing. http://www.efchina.org/documents/2_Energy_scenarios.pdf. Cited 1 June 2006

  • Parikh KS (2006) Integrated energy policy: report of the expert committee. Planning Commission, Government of India, New Delhi. http://planningcommission.nic.in/reports/genrep/rep_intengy.pdf. Cited 23 July 2007

  • People’s Daily Online (2007) China’s power generating capacity tops 622 mln kilowatts. 23 January, Beijing. http://english.people.com.cn/200701/23/eng20070123_343745.html. Cited 23 July 2007

  • Persson TA, Azar C, Lindgren K (2006) Allocation of CO2 emission permits: economic incentives for emission reductions in developing countries. Energy Policy 34(14):1889–1899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Planning Commission, India (PC) (2007) Towards faster and more inclusive growth: an approach to the 11th Five Year Plan. Government of India, New Delhi. http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/planrel/app11_16jan.pdf. Cited 23 July 2007

  • Romero S (2006) Two industry leaders bet on coal but split on cleaner approach. New York Times 28 May:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan P, Sun F (2007) Energy use and CO2 emissions in China: interpreting changing trends and future directions, CSES Climate Change Working Paper no. 13. Centre for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan P, Jones R et al (2007) Climate change and the new world economy: implications for the nature and timing of policy responses. CSES Climate Change Working Paper no. 12. Centre for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinton JE, Levine MD (1994) Changing energy intensity in Chinese industry: the relative importance of structural shift and intensity change. Energy Policy 17:239–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinton JE, Levine MD, Wang Q (1998) Energy efficiency in China: accomplishments and challenges. Energy Policy 26(11):813–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern N et al (2007) Stern review on the economics of climate change. HM Treasury and UK Cabinet Office, London. http://www.sternreview.org.uk. Cited 23 July 2007

  • Swart R et al (2002) Stabilisation scenarios for climate impact assessment. Glob Environ Change 12(3):155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2007) Decision -/CP.13: reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries: approaches to stimulate action. UNFCCC, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vuuren D, O’Neill B (2006) The consistency of IPCC’s SRES scenarios to 1900–2000: trends and recent projections. Clim Change 75:9–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vuuren D et al (2003) Regional costs and benefits of alternative post-Kyoto climate regimes: comparison of variants of the Multi-stage and Per Capita Convergence regimes. RIVM report 728001025/2003. RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • WBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change) (2003) Climate protection strategies for the 21st Century Kyoto and beyond. German Advisory Council on Global Change, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen J (2006) Report on the work of the government 2006. Delivered at the Fourth Session of the Tenth National People’s Congress on March 5. People’s Republic of China, Beijing. http://english.gov.cn/official/2006-03/14/content_227248.htm. Cited 23 July 2007

  • Weyant JP, De la Chesnaye FC, Blanford G (2006) Overview of EMF-21: multi-gas mitigation and climate change. Energy J 22:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigley T, Richels R, Edmonds J (1996) Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric co2 concentrations. Nature 379(6562):240–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler H, Spalding-Fecher R, Tyani L (2002) Comparing developing countries under potential carbon allocation schemes. Climate Policy 2:303–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z (2003) Why did the energy intensity fall in China’s industrial sector in the 1990s? Energy Econ 25:625–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Sheehan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheehan, P. The new global growth path: implications for climate change analysis and policy. Climatic Change 91, 211–231 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9415-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9415-z

Keywords

Navigation