Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cost and Co2-Emission Reduction of Biomass Cascading: Methodological Aspects and Case Study of SRF Poplar

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents and applies a coherent methodological framework to compare biomass cascading chains, i.e. the subsequent use of biomass for materials, recycling and energy recovery, considering land use, CO2 emission reduction and economic performance. Example cascading chains of short rotation poplar wood are compared with each other on the basis of literature data. Results for these chains vary strongly, namely, from CO2 mitigation benefits of 200\(\,{}\)/Mg CO2 to CO2 mitigation costs of 2200\(\,{}\)/Mg CO2, and from net CO2 emission reductions per hectare of biomass production of 28 Mg CO2/(ha yr) to net CO2 emissions of 8 Mg CO2/(ha yr). Using a present-value approach to determine CO2 emissions and costs affects the performance of long-term cascading chains significantly, i.e. cost and CO2 emission reduction are decreased. In general, cascading has the potential to improve both CO2 emission reduction per hectare and CO2 mitigation costs of biomass usage. However, this strongly depends on the biomass applications combined in the cascading chain. Parameters that significantly influence the results are market prices and gross energy requirements of substituted materials and energy carriers, and the efficiency of biomass production. The method presented in this study is suitable to quantify land use, CO2 emission reduction and economic performance of biomass cascading systems, and highlights the possible impact of time on the attractiveness of specific cascading chains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APME: 1999, Eco-Profiles of Polymers and Related Intermediates, Association of Polymers Manufacturers in Europe, Brussels.

  • Balatinecz, J., Kretschmann, D. E., and Leclercq, A.: 2001, ‘Achievements in the utilization of poplar wood: Guideposts for the future’, The Forestry Chronicle 77, 265–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biewinga, E. E. and van der Bijl, G.: 1996, Sustainability of Energy Crops in Europe, Centre for Agriculture & Environment, Utrecht.

  • Börjesson, P. and Gustavsson, L.: 2000, ‘Greenhouse gas balances in building construction: Wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives’, Biomass Bioenergy 28, 575–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boogardt, V. C. A.: 2000, Hout in de herkansing—Onderzoek naar cascades in het houtgebruik, Stichting Bos en Hout, Wageningen.

  • van den Broek, R. C. A., van den Burg, T., van Wijk, A. J. M., and Turkenburg, W. C.: 2000, ‘Electricity generation from eucalyptus and bagasse by sugar mills in Nicaragua: A comparison with fuel oil electricity generation on the basis of costs, macro-economic impacts and environmental emissions’, Biomass Bioenergy 19, 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek, R. C. A., Treffers, D. J., Meeusen, M., van Wijk, A., Nieuwlaar, E., Turkenburg, W. C., and Londo, M.: 2001, ‘Green energy or organic food: A life cycle assessment comparing two uses of set-aside land’, J. Ind. Ecol 5, 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek, R. C. A., van Wijk, A., and Turkenburg, W. C.: 2002, ‘Electricity from energy crops in different settings: A country comparison between Nicaragua, Ireland and The Netherlands’, Biomass Bioenergy 22, 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBS: 2002, Verkopen industriële producten, Prodcom (in hoeveelheid en waarde), Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Heerlen.

  • CEFIC: 2000, Petrochemistry Activity Review, European Chemical Industry Council, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEFIC: 2002, A Panorama of the Petrochemical Industry’s Performance in 2000–2001, European Chemical Industry Council, Petrochemistry Programme, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIRFS: 2002, Man-Made Fibre Production, Comité International de la Rayonne et des Fibres Synthétiques, Brussel.

    Google Scholar 

  • CML: 2001, LCA: An Operational Guide to the ISO Standards, University Leiden, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • DCO: 1999, Sustainable Technological Development in Chemistry: Improving the Quality of Life Through Chemistry and Agriculture, Stichting DCO, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dix, B., Roffael, E., and Buchholzer, P.: 1993, ‘Industrieholz fuer die Spanplatten- und Zellstoffherstellung’, in Hüttermann, A. E. (ed.), Anbau von Pappel bei mittlerer Umtriebszeit - Aspekte der Produktionsbiologie, Nutzungstechnologien und Ökonomie. J.D. Sauerländer’s Verlag, Frankfurt a. M., Schriften aus der Forstlichen Fakultät der Universität Göttingen und der Niedersächsischen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt - Band 110, 113–135.

  • DOE: 1997, Renewable Energy Technology Characterizations; Biomass Technologies, US Department of Energy, DOE/EPRI, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornburg, V. and Faaij, A.: 2001a, ‘Cost and CO2-emission reduction by applying multi-product and cascading systems of biomass’, Paper Presented at Bioenergy for Rural Area Development, 26–29 September 2001, Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw.

  • Dornburg, V. and Faaij, A.: 2001b, ‘Efficiency and economy of wood-fired biomass energy systems in relation to scale regarding heat and power generation using combustion and gasification technologies’, Biomass Bioenergy 21, 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornburg, V., Lewandowski, I., and Patel, M.:2003, ‘Land requirements, energy savings and greenhouse gas emissions reduction of bio-based polymers compared to bioenergy: An analysis and system extension of LCA studies’, J. Ind. Ecol. 7(3–4), 109–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat: 2000, Agricultural Land Prices and Rents in the UE, Data 1977–1998, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Brussels/Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eibl, M., Mangeng, B., and Alber, S.: 1996. Ökobilanz von Lenzing Lyocell, Lenzing Lyocell, Heiligenkreuz.

  • Eurostat: 1997, Panorama of EU Industry, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Brussels/Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat: 2000, Panorama of European business, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Brussels/Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faaij, A., Hamelinck, C., and Tijmensen, M.: 2000, ‘Long term perspectives for production of fuels from biomass; integrated assessment and RD&D priorities - preliminary results’, in Kyritsis, S., Beenackers, A. A. C. M., Helm, P., Grassi, A., and Chiaramonti, D. (eds.), Proceedings of 1st World Conference on Biomass for Energy and Industry, James & James, London, pp. 687–691.

  • Faaij, A., Meuleman, B., and van Ree, R.: 1998, Long Term perspectives of BIG/CC Technology, NOVEM, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO: 2002, FAO Statistical Database -Forestry Data, Retrived from http://apps.fao.org/page/ collections?subset forestry, last update 19 December 2001 (accessed 2002).

  • Finnveden, G. and Ekvall, T.: 1998, ‘Life-cycle assessment as a decision-support tool — the case of recycling versus incineration of paper, Resour. conservation Recycling 24, 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forintek: 1993, Raw Material Balances, Energy Profiles and Environmental Unit Factor Estimates for Structural Wood Products, Forintek Canada Corp., Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraanje, P. J.: 1997, ‘Cascading of pine wood’, Resour. Conservation Recycling 19, 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frühwald, A., Scharai-Rad, M., Hasch, J., Wegener, G., and Zimmer, B.:1997, Erstellung von Ökobilanzen für die Forst- und Holzwirtschaft. Informationsdienst Holz, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Holzforschung, München.

  • Gärtner, S. O., Müller-Sämann, K., Reinhardt, G. A., and Vetter, R.: 2002, ‘Corn to Plastics: A comprehensive environmental assessment’, in Proceedings of the 12th European Biomass Conference, 17–21 June 2002, Amsterdam, London, James & James, pp. 1324–1326.

  • Green, C.: 2000, ‘Potential scale-related problems in estimating the costs of CO2 mitigation policies’, Climatic Change 44, 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goverse, T., Hekkert, M. P., Groenewegen, P., Worrell, E., and Smits, R. E. H. M.: 2001, ‘Wood innovation in the residential construction sector; opportunities and constraints’, Resour. Conservation Recycling 34, 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, L. B. and Gifford, R. M.: 2000, ‘Soil carbon stocks and land use change: A meta analysis’, Global Change Biol. 8,345–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamelinck, C. N. and Faaij, A. P. C.: 2002, ‘Future prospects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass’, J. Power Sources 111, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, E. A.: 1993, ‘Soil carbon sequestration beneath hybridpoplar plantations in the North Central United States’, Biomass Bioenergy 5, 431–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haygreen, J. G. and Bowyer, J. L.: 1996, Forest Products and Wood Science, Iowa State University Press, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Heijningen, R. J. J., de Castro, J. F. M., Worrell, E., and Hazewinkel, J. H. O.: 1992, Meer energiekentallen in relatie tot preventie en hergebruik van afvalstromen. Castro Consulting Engineer, Amersfoort.

  • Hekkert, M. P. and Worrell, E.: 1998, Technology Characterisation of Natural Organic Materials, Input data for Western European MARKAL, Utrecht University, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekkert, M. P., Joosten, L. A. J., and Worrell, E.: 2000, ‘Reduction of CO2 emissions by management of material and product use, the case of transport packaging’, Resour Conservation Recycling 30, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA: 2002a. Energy Balances of OECD Countries, 1999-2000, International Energy Agency, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA: 2002b, End-User Petroleum Product Prices and Average Crude Oil Import Costs, International Energy Agency, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA: 2002c, CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 1971–2000, International Energy Agency, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC: 1999, Special Report on Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • IPCC: 2001a, Climate Change 2001, The Scientific Basis, Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • IPCC: 2001b, IPCC Third Assessment, Climate Mitigation 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joosten, L. A. J.: 2001, The Industrial Metabolism of Plastics; Analysis of Material Flows, Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions in the Lifecycle of Plastics, Thesis Dissertation, Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht.

  • Kaltschmitt, M. and Reinhard, G.: 1997, Nachwachsende Energietrager: Grundlagen, Verfahren, ökologische Bilanzierung. Vieweg, Braunschweig.

  • Katofsky, R. E.: 1993, The Production of Fluid Fuels from Biomass, Centre for Energy and Environmental Studies, Princeton University, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klass, D. L.: 1998, Biomass for Renewable Energy, Fuels and Chemicals, Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowski, I.: 2001, Energiepflanzenproduktion, in Kaltschmitt, M., and Hartmann, H. (eds.), Energie aus Biomasse - Grundlagen, Techniken und Verfahren. Springer, Berlin, 57–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettens, S., Muys, B., Ceulemans, R., Moons, E., Garcia, J., and Coppin, P.: 2003, ‘Energy budget and greenhouse gas balance evaluation of sustainable coppice systems for electricity production’, Biomass Bioenergy 24, 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynd, L. R., Elander, R. T., and Wyman, C. E.: 1996, ‘Likely features and costs of mature biomass ethanol technology’, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 57 /58, 741–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland, G., Fruit, K., and Sedjo, R.: 2001, ‘Accounting for sequestered carbon: The question of permanence’, Environ. Sci. Policy 4, 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marland, G., Schlamadinger, B., and Leiby, P.: 1997, ‘Forest/biomass based mitigation strategies: Does the timing of carbon reductions matter?’Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27, 213–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ney, R. A. and Schnoor, J. L.: 2002, ‘Incremental life cycle analysis: Using uncertainty analysis to frame greenhouse gas balances from bio-energy systems for emission trading’, Biomass Bioenergy 22, 257–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nossin, P., Joosten, J., and Bruggink, A.: 2002, Future Feedstock for Commodity Polymers: Ecothene TM Sustainability in the 21st Century, DSM Research BV, Geleen.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD and IEA: 2001, Forestry Projects: Permanence, Credit Accounting and Lifetime, OECD Environment Directorate, International Energy Agency, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, M.: 1994, Analyse der Herstellung von Chemifasern (unpublished), Currently at the Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University.

  • Patel, M: 1999, Closing Carbon Cycles - Carbon Use for Materials in the Context of Resource Efficiency and Climate Change, Thesis Dissertation, Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht.

  • Patel, M.: 2000, ‘Biomass for ethylene or for electricity generation’, Agro-Industry HI-Tech Sept/Oct 2000, 9–13.

  • Patel, M., Bastioli, C., Marini, L., and Würdinger. E: 2003, ‘Environmental assessment of biobased polymers and natural fibres’, in Doi, Y. and Steinbüchel, A. (eds.), Biopolymers Vol. 10, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paustian, K., Cole, C. V., Sauerbeck, D., and Sampson, N.: 1998, ‘CO2 mitigation by agriculture: An overview’, Climatic Change 40, 135–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phylipsen, D., de Beer, J., Kerssemeeckers, M., Timmers, G., Patel, M., Byers, C., Hendriks, C., and Joosen, S.: 2002, Clean Technologies in the Materials Sector - Current and Future Environmental Performance of Material Technologies, Ecofys, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portney, P. R. and Weyant, J. P. (eds.): 1999, ‘Discounting and intergenerational equity’, Resources for Future, Washington D.C.

  • REU and FAL: 1996, Renewable Energy: Potential Energy Crops for Europe and the Mediterranean Region, REU Technical Series No. 46, FAO Regional Office for Europe, Federal Agricultural Research Centre Germany, Braunschweig.

  • Richter, K., Fischer, M., Gahlmann, H., Huser, A., and Menard, M.: 1995, Energie- und Stoffbilanzen bei der Herstellung von Wärmedämmstoffen. EMPA - Abteilung Holz, Dübendorf.

  • Roffael, E., Dix, B., Khoo, K. C., Ong, C. L., and Lee, T. W.: 1992, Mitteldichte Faserplatten (MDF) aus jungem Pappelholz unterschiedlicher Eigenschaften, Holzforschung 46, 163–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson, R., Girourd, P., Zan, C., Marin. B., Mehdi, R., and Hennin, J.: 1999, The Implications of Growing Short-Rotation Tree Species for Carbon Sequestration in Canada, R.E.A.P., Quebec.

  • Schlamadinger, B., Apps, M., Bohlin, F., Gustavsson, L., Jungmeier, G., Marland, G., Pingoud, K., and Savolainen, I.: 1997, ‘Towards a standard methodology for greenhouse gas balances of bio-energy systems in comparison with fossil energy systems’, Biomass Bioenergy 13, 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solantausta, Y., Bridgewater, T., and Beckman, D.: 1997, Electricity Production by Advanced Biomass Power Systems, VTT, Espoo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolp, J., Tjeedsma, B., and Sierra-Alvarez, R.: 1996, Kansen voor juveniel populierehout: Technische en economische analyse, CPV, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teeuwissen, S. K.: 1999, Co-firing Biomass in the Europeat Power Station in Ireland: An Assessment of Pure Energy Crops Versus Multi-Product Plantations and Sawmill Residues, Utrecht University, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkenburg, W. C., Beurskens, J., Faaij, A., Fraenkel, P., Fridleifsson, I., Lysen, E., Mills, D., Moreira, J. R., Nilsson, L. J., Schaap, A., and Sinke, W. C. (lead authors): 2000, ‘Section 7: Renewable energy technologies’, in Goldemberg, J. (ed.), World Energy Assessment of the United Nations, UNDP, Washington D.C.

  • UN: 1998, 1996, Industrial Commodity Statistics Yearbook: Production Statistics (1987–1996),United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN/ECE and FAO: 2001, Forest Products Annual Market Review, 1999–2000, FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN/ECE and FAO: 2002, Forest Products Annual Market Review, 2000–2001, FAO, Rome.

  • Wiley: 1985, Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, Wiley-Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. H., Larson, E. D., Katofsky, R. E., and Chen, J.: 1995, ‘Methanol and hydrogen from biomassa for transportation’, Energy Sustainable Dev. 5, 18–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Science, Technology and Society, University Utrecht; Copernicus Institute, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584, Utrecht, CS, The Netherlands

    Veronika Dornburg & André P. C. Faaij

Authors
  1. Veronika Dornburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. André P. C. Faaij
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veronika Dornburg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dornburg, V., Faaij, A.P.C. Cost and Co2-Emission Reduction of Biomass Cascading: Methodological Aspects and Case Study of SRF Poplar. Climatic Change 71, 373–408 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-5934-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-5934-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation