Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carbon for Farmers: Assessing the Potential for Soil Carbon Sequestration in the Old Peanut Basin of Senegal

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carbon sequestration in soil organic matter of degraded Sahelian agro-ecosystems could play a significant role in the global carbon (C) uptake through terrestrial sinks while, simultaneously, contributing to sustainable agriculture and desertification control. The paper documents the results of a two-year pilot project in Senegal assessing real project opportunities with main emphasis on the West-Central Agricultural Region (“Old Peanut Basin”). Current total system C content in this region, calculated on the basis of in situ soil and biomass carbon measurements, amounted to 28 t ha–1 with 11 t C ha–1 in soils (0–20 cm) and 6.3 t C ha–1 in trees. Potential changes in soil C, simulated with CENTURY for a 25-year period, ranged from –0.13 t C ha–1 yr–1 under poor management to +0.43 t C ha–1 yr–1 under optimum agricultural intensification. Simulated changes in crop yields varied from –62% to +200% under worst and best management scenarios respectively. Best management practices that generate the highest sequestration rates are economically not feasible for the majority of local smallholders, unless considerable financial support is provided. Especially when applied on a larger scale, such packages risk to undermine local, opportunistic management regimes and, in the long run, also the beneficiaries’ capacity to successfully adapt to their constantly changing environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badiane, A. N., Khouma, M., and Séne, M.: 2000, Région de Diourbel: Gestion des sols, Drylands Research Working Paper 15, Drylands Research, Somerset, England, p. 25.

  • Batjes, N. H.: 2001, ‘Options for increasing carbon sequestration in West African soils: an exploratory study with special focus on Senegal’, Land Degrad. Dev. 12, 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremner, J. M.: 1996, ‘Nitrogen-Total’, in Sparks, D. L. (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3. Chemical Methods, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 1085–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, J. P., Frome, M., Haites, E., Janzen, H., Lal, R., and Paustian, K.: 1998, ‘Carbon sequestration in soils’, Soil Water Conserv. 54, 382–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre de Suivi Ecologique: 2000, Annuaire sur l’environnement et les ressources naturelles du Sénégal, Centre de Suivi Ecologique, Dakar, Senegal, p. 268.

  • Chambers, R.: 1997, Whose Reality Counts ? Putting the First Last, Intermediate Technology Publications, London, p. 249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabin, B.: 1967, ‘Application des dosages automatiques à l’analyse des sols. 3ème partie’, Cahiers ORSTOM, Série Pédologie 5(3), 257–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, P. R.: 1965, ‘Particle fraction and particle-size analysis’, in Black, C. A. (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part I, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 545–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)—UNESCO: 1974, Soil map of the world, 1:5000000, Vol.1, Legend, UNESCO, Paris.

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): 1997, Estimating Biomass and Biomass Change of Tropical Forests: A Primer, FAO Forestry Paper 134, FAO, Rome, p. 55.

  • Izaurralde, R. C., McGill, W. B., and Rosenberg, N. J.: 2000, ‘Carbon cost of applying nitrogen fertilizer’, Science 288, 811–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R.: 1999, ‘Soil management and restoration for C sequestration to mitigate the accelerated greenhouse effect’, Progress Environ. Sci. 1, 307–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R., Hassan, H., and Dumanski, J.: 1999, ‘Desertification control to sequester C and mitigate the greenhouse effect’, in Rosenberg, N., Izaurralde, R. C., Malone, E. L. (eds.), Carbon Sequestration in Soils: Science, Monitoring, and Beyond, Proceedings of the St. Michaels Workshop, December 1998, Batelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 83–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, L. and Ardö, J.: 2002, ‘Soil carbon sequestration in degraded semiarid agro-ecosystems: Perils and potentials’, Ambio 31(6), 471–477.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parton, W. J., Ojima, D. S., Cole, C. V., and Schimel, D. S.: 1994, ‘A general model for soil organic matter dynamics: Sensitivity to litter chemistry, texture and management’, in Proceedings Quantitative Modeling of Soil Forming Processes, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 2 November 1992, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieri, C. J. M. G.: 1992, Fertility of Soils: A Future for Farming in the West African Savanna, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, p. 348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringius, L.: 2002, ‘Soil carbon sequestration and the CDM: Opportunities and challenges for Africa’, Climatic Change, 54, 471–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, M.: 2001, Soil Carbon Sequestration for Improved Land Management, World Soil Resources Reports 96, FAO, Rome, p. 62.

  • Rogers, E. M.: 1995, Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edition, The Free Press, New York, p. 518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, W. H.: 2000, ‘Carbon sequestration in soils: Some cautions amidst optimism’, Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 82, 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjemstad, J. O., Clarke, P., Taylor, J. A., Oades, J. M., and McClure, S. G.: 1996, ‘The chemistry and nature of protected carbon in soil’, Aust. J. Soil Res. 34, 251–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squires, V. R., Glenn, E. P., and Ayoub, A. T. (eds.): 1997, Combating Global Climate Change by Combating Land Degradation, Nairobi, UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiessen, H., Feller, C., Sampaio, E. V. S. B., and Garin, P.: 1998, ‘Carbon sequestration and turnover in semiarid savannas and dry forest’, Climatic Change 40, 105–117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tschakert, P.: (2004), ‘The costs of soil carbon sequestration: An economic analysis for small-scale farming systems in Senegal’, Agric. Sys. 81, 227–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschakert, P.: (in press b), ‘More food, less poverty? The potential role of carbon sequestration in smallholder farming systems in Senegal’, in Lal, R., Uphoff, N., Stewart, B. A. and Hansen, D. O. (eds.), Climate Change and Global Food Security, Marcel Dekker, New York.

  • Walkley, A.: 1947, ‘A critical examination of a rapid method for determining organic carbon in soils: Effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents’, Soil Sci. 63, 251–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woomer, P. L., Palm, C. A., Qureshi, J. N., and Kotto-Same, J.: 1997, ‘Carbon sequestration and organic resources management in African smallholder agriculture’, in Lal, R., Kimble, J. M., Follett, R. F., and Stewart, B. A. (eds.), Management of Carbon Sequestration in Soil, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 153–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woomer, P. L., Tieszen L., Tappan, G., Touré, A., and Sall, M.: (in press), ‘Land use change and terrestrial carbon stocks in Senegal’, J. Arid Environ.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra Tschakert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tschakert, P. Carbon for Farmers: Assessing the Potential for Soil Carbon Sequestration in the Old Peanut Basin of Senegal. Climatic Change 67, 273–290 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-004-1821-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-004-1821-2

Keywords

Navigation