Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of chemiluminescence methods for analysis of hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radicals

  • Published:
Czechoslovak Journal of Physics Aims and scope

Abstract

Assessment of alpha radiolysis influence on the chemistry of geologically disposed spent fuel demands analytical methods for radiolytic product determination at trace levels. Several chemiluminescence methods for the detection of radiolytic oxidants hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radicals are tested. Two of hydrogen peroxide methods use luminol, catalyzed by either μ-peroxidase or hemin, one uses 10-methyl-9-(p-formylphenyl)-acridinium carboxylate trifluoromethanesulfonate and one potassium periodate. All recipes are tested as batch systems in basic conditions. For hydroxyl radical detection luminophores selected are 3-hydroxyphthalic hydrazide and rutin. Both methods are tested as batch systems.

The results are compared and the applicability of the methods for near-field dissolution studies is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu J. and Neretnieks I.: Nucl. Tech. 135 (2001) 154.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rondinella V.V. et al.: Radiochim. Acta 88 (2000) 527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sunder S., Miller N.H. and Shoesmith D.W.: Corr. Sci. 46 (2004) 1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dodeigne C., Thunus L., and Lejeune R.: Talanta 51 (2000) 415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Olsson B.: Analytica Chimica Acta 136 (1982) 113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eriksen T.E., Eklund U., Werme L., Bruno J.: J. Nucl. Mat. 277 (1995) 76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Broudic V. et al.: In: ATALANTE 2004: Advances for future nuclear cycles, Nîmes 21–24 June, 2004.

  8. Price D., Worsfold P.J., Fauzi R., and Mantoura C.: Anal. Chim. Acta 298 (1994) 121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Trupin V.W. et al.: J. Phys. Chem. A104 (2000) 8709.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Auclair G.: Détermination de rendements radiolytiques primaires alpha en milieu alcalin. Thèse de Doctorat, Université Paris XI, 2001.

  11. Yoshizumi K. et al: Atmospheric Environment 18 (1984) 395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper W. J., Moegling J. K., Kieber R. J., and Kiddle J. J.: Mar. Chem. 70 (2000) 191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin J.-M., Arakawa H., and Yamada M.: Anal. Chim. Acta 371 (1998) 171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshiki Y., Okubo K., Onuma M., and Igarashi K.: Phytochem 39 (1995) 225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Backa S., Jansbo K., and Reitberger T.: Holzforschung 51 (1997) 557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lindsey M.E. and Tarr M.A.: Chemosphere 41 (2000) 409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pehrman, R., Amme, M. & Cachoir, C. Comparison of chemiluminescence methods for analysis of hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radicals. Czech J Phys 56 (Suppl 4), D373–D379 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10582-006-0527-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10582-006-0527-2

Keywords

Navigation