Skip to main content
Log in

High-resolution comparative chromosome painting in the Arizona collared peccary (Pecari tajacu, Tayassuidae): a comparison with the karyotype of pig and sheep

  • Published:
Chromosome Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We used chromosome painting with chromosome-specific probes derived from domestic sheep and pig for a high-resolution cytogenetic comparison with the karyotype of collared peccary (Pecari tajacu sonoriensis). A reorganization of the karyotype involving at least 62–66 conserved segments were observed between the sheep and collared peccary. This is an extremely high number compared with other members of the same mammalian order (Cetartiodactyla). The comparison between pig and collared peccary, both belonging to the Suiformes, however, revealed various changes in the gross organization of both karyotypes that may have already occurred in a common ancestor of both species suggesting a monophyletic origin of Suidae/Tayassuidae. The sheep probes, however, also revealed several rearrangements between the two Suidae/Tayassuidae, indicating that these probes represent a useful tool for a more detailed analysis of the evolutionary history of Suiformes. Our sample of the collared peccary from North America (Arizona, USA) showed distinct differences to those already described from South America. The chromosome painting results defined a complex translocation that involves chromosomes including about one-quarter of the entire collared peccary karyotype. This considerable rearrangement indicates subspecies or even species status of both peccary populations, as it should present a significant barrier for their hybridization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bielec PE, Gallagher DS, Womack JE, Busbee DL (1998) Homologies between human and dolphin chromosomes detected by heterologous chromosome painting. Cytogenet Cell Genet 81: 18–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biltueva LS, Yang F, Vorobieva NV, Graphodatsky AS (2004) Comparative map between the domestic pig and dog. Mamm Genome 15: 809–818.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bosma AA, de Haan NA, Arkesteijn GJ, Yang F, Yerle M, Zijlstra C (2004) Comparative chromosome painting between the domestic pig (Sus scrofa) and two species of peccary, the collared peccary (Tayassu tajacu) and the white-lipped peccary (T. pecari): a phylogenetic perspective. Cytogenet Genome Res 105: 115–121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhary BP, Raudsepp T, Fronicke L, Scherthan H (1998) Emerging patterns of comparative genome organization in some mammalian species as revealed by Zoo-FISH. Genome Res 8: 577–589.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Consigliere S, Stanyon R, Koehler U, Agoramoorthy G, Wienberg J (1996) Chromosome painting defines genomic rearrangements between red howler monkey subspecies. Chromosome Res 4: 264–270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fauth C, Speicher MR (2001) Classifying by colors: FISH-based genome analysis. Cytogenet Cell Genet 93: 1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Froenicke L (2005) Origins of primate chromosomes–as delineated by Zoo-FISH and alignments of human and mouse draft genome sequences. Cytogenet Genome Res 108: 122–138.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Froenicke L, Wienberg J (2001) Comparative chromosome painting defines the high rate of karyotype changes between pigs and bovids. Mamm Genome 12: 442–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froenicke L, Chowdhary BP, Scherthan H, Gustavsson I (1996) A comparative map of the porcine and human genomes demonstrates ZOO-FISH and gene mapping-based chromosomal homologies. Mamm Genome 7: 285–290.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goureau A, Yerle M, Schmitz A et al. (1996) Human and porcine correspondence of chromosome segments using bidirectional chromosome painting. Genomics 36: 252–262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Groves CP, Grubb P (1993) The Suborder Suiformes. In: Oliver, WLR, ed. Pigs, Peccaries, and Hippos. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.

  • Müller S, Stanyon R, Finelli P, Archidiacono N, Wienberg J (2000) Molecular cytogenetic dissection of human chromosomes 3 and 21 evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 206–211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy WJ, Froenicke L, O'Brien SJ, Stanyon R (2003) The origin of human chromosome 1 and its homologs in placental mammals. Genome Res 13: 1880–1888.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien SJ, Eisenberg JF, Miyamoto M et al. (1999a) Genome maps 10. Comparative genomics. Mammalian radiations. Wall chart. Science 286: 463–478.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien SJ, Menotti-Raymond M, Murphy WJ et al. (1999b) The promise of comparative genomics in mammals. Science 286: 458–481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinton A, Ducos A, Yerle M (2003) Chromosomal rearrangements in cattle and pigs revealed by chromosome microdissection and chromosome painting. Genet Sel Evol 35: 685–696.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ried T, Baldini A, Rand TC, Ward DC (1992) Simultaneous visualization of seven different DNA probes by in situ hybridization using combinatorial fluorescence and digital imaging microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 1388–1392.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz A, Oustry A, Vaiman D, Chaput B, Frelat G, Cribiu EP (1998) Comparative karyotype of pig and cattle using whole chromosome painting probes. Hereditas 128: 257–263.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schröck E, du Manoir S, Veldman T et al. (1996) Multicolor spectral karyotyping of human chromosomes. Science 273: 494–497.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wienberg J (2004) The evolution of eutherian chromosomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 14: 657–666.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wienberg J (2005) Fluorescence in situ hybridization to chromosomes as a tool to understand human and primate genome evolution. Cytogenet Genome Res 108: 139–160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wienberg J, Frönicke L, Stanyon R (2000) Insights into mammalian genome organization and evolution by molecular cytogenetics. In: Clark MS, ed. Comparative Genomics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 207–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang F, O'Brien PC, Milne BS et al. (1999) A complete comparative chromosome map for the dog, red fox, and human and its integration with canine genetic maps. Genomics 62: 189–202.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raquel Chaves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adega, F., Chaves, R., Kofler, A. et al. High-resolution comparative chromosome painting in the Arizona collared peccary (Pecari tajacu, Tayassuidae): a comparison with the karyotype of pig and sheep. Chromosome Res 14, 243–251 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-006-1040-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-006-1040-y

Key words

Navigation