Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cast aluminized explosives (review)

  • Published:
Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper reviews the current status and future trends of aluminized explosives. The major focus is on cast compositions, which encompass both the melt-cast trinitrotoluene (TNT) based and the slurry cast polymer-based compositions. Widely reported RDX and HMX based aluminized compositions with TNT used as a binder are discussed in detail. Various researchers have suggested a 15–20% Al content as an optimum from the viewpoint of velocity of detonation. A higher Al content, however, is incorporated in most of the compositions for a sustained blast effect, due to the potential of secondary reactions of Al with detonation products. The effect of the aluminum particle size on performance parameters (velocity of detonation, etc.) is included. There are some recent works on nanometric Al based compositions, and the results obtained by various researchers suggest mixed trends for RDX-TNT compositions. Studies on nitrotriazol and TNT based compositions bring out their low vulnerability. Some of the interesting findings on ammonium dinitramide and bis(2,2,2-trinitro-ethyl)nitramine (BTNEN) based compositions are also included. The review brings out superiority of polymer based aluminized explosives, as compared to conventional TNT based compositions, particularly, with respect to low vulnerability. In general, aluminized plastic bonded explosives find numerous underwater applications. Ammonium perchlorate (AP) is also incorporated, particularly, for enhancing underwater shock wave and bubble energy. Hydroxyl terminated polybutadiene appears to be the binder of choice. However, nitrocellulose, polyethylene glycol, and polycaprolactone polymer based compositions with energetic plasticizers, like bis-dinitropropyl acetal/formal (BDNPA/F, 1/1 mix), trimethylol ethane trinitrate, and triethylene glycol dinitrate are also investigated. Polyethylene glycol and polycaprolactone polymer based compositions are found to be low vulnerable, particularly, in terms of shock sensitivity. Highly insensitive polymer bonded nitrotriazol based compositions are being pursued all over the globe. The highly insensitive CL-20/AP combination meets the demands of high density and high velocity of detonation. Glycidyl azide polymer and poly nitratomethyl methyl oxetane appear to be binders of interest for plastic bonded explosives in view of their superior energetics. The vulnerability aspects of these compositions, however, need to be studied in detail. Brief information on plastic bonded and gelled thermobaric explosives is also included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Roth, “Performance of explosives,” German Patent No. 173327 (1900).

  2. J. S. Gharia, B. K. Athawale, and P. D. Sathye, “HE composition for enhanced blast effect,” in: Proc. 1st Symp. on Warhead Technology, TBRL, Chandigarh (1983), pp. 152–161.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Maranda, “Research on the process of detonation explosive of mixtures of the oxidiser fuel type containing Al powder,” Propell., Explos. Pyrotech., 15 (1990), pp. 161–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Anderson, “Explosive. Ch. 2,” in: J. Carleone (ed.), Progr. Astronaut. Aeronaut., Vol. 155: Tactical Missile Warhead, Amer. Inst. of Aeronautic and Astronautic, Washington (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. S. Gharia, B. K. Athawale, S. R. Visal, and V. V. Phadtare, “Effect of Al particle size and percentage on blast composition,” in: Proc. 1st Symp. on Warhead Technology, TBRL, Chandigarh (1983), pp. 144–151.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Stromose and S. W. Eriksen, “Performance of high explosives in underwater application. Part 2: Aluminised explosives,” Propell., Explos., Pyrotech., 15, 52–53 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Keicher, A. Happ, and A. Kretschmer, “Influence of Al/ammonium perchlorate on the performance of underwater explosives,” Propell., Explos., Pyrotech., 24, 140–143 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. L. S. Wise, “Effect of Al on the rate of detonation of TNT,” Picatiny Arsenal Technical Report-1550, Dover (1945).

  9. W. R. Tomlinson (Jr.), “Development of new high explosive filler for AP shot,” Picatiny Arsenal Technical Report-1290, Dover (1943).

  10. W. B. Kennedy, R. F. Arentzen, and C. W. Tait, “Survey of the performance of TNT/Al on the basis of airblast pressure and impulse,” Monthly Report No. AES-6, OSRD 649, Division 2, (25 Jan., 1945).

  11. J. Akhavan, The Chemistry of Explosives, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. L. Frost, S. Goroshin, R. Ripley, and Zhang Fan, “Effect of scale on the blast wave from a metallized explosive,” in: Proc. 13th Int. Detonation Symp., Norfolk (2006).

  13. F. Volk, H. Barthelt, F. Schedlbauer, and J. Wagner, “Detonation products of insensitive cast high explosives,” in: Proc. 8th Symp. (Int.) on Detonation, Albuquerque (1985), pp. 577–586.

  14. G. Baudin and A. Bergues, “Reaction model for aluminized PBX applied to underwater explosion calculations,” in: Proc. 10th Int. Detonation Symp., Boston (1993), pp. 646–655.

  15. P. J. Miller, C. D. Bedford, and J. J. Davis, “Effect of metal particle size on the detonation properties of various metallised explosives,” in: Proc. 11th Detonation (Int.) Symp., Snowmass, Colorado (1998), pp. 214–220.

  16. “Encyclopedia of explosives and related items,” Picatiny Arsenal Technical Report-2700, V. 9, Dover (1983). P. T-396.

  17. R. L. Simpson, R. W. Swansiger, D. M. Hoffinan, et al., “Target penetrator explosive development: optimization of fragment, blast and survivability properties of explosives for hard target applications,” in: 47th Annu. Bomb and Warhead Technical Meeting, Los Alamos (1997).

  18. J. D. Corley, “Fuzed insensitive general purpose bomb containing AFX-645,” in: Proc. Int. Symp. on Energetic Materials Technology, Meeting No. 680 (Phoenix, September 24–27, 1995), American Defence Preparedness Association (1995), pp. 98–103.

  19. T. S. Costain and R. V. Motto, “The sensitivity, performance and material properties of some high explosives formulations,” Picatiny Arsenal Technical Report-4587. Dover (1973), pp. 50–51.

  20. W. C. Tao, C. M. Tarver, J. W. Kury, et al., “Understanding composite explosive energetics: IV. Reaction flow modeling of Al reaction kinetics in PETN and TNT using normalized product equation of state,” in: Proc. 10th Int. Detonation Symp., Boston (1993), pp. 628–636.

  21. P. Brosseau, “Nanometric Al in explosives,” Propell., Explos., Pyrotech., 27, 300–306 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. L. A. Roslund and N. L. Coleburn, “Hydrodynamic behavior of HBX-1 and equation of state of the detonation products below the Chapman-Jouguet state,” Naval Ordinance Lab., White OAK, Maryland (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. A. Roslund and N. L. Coleburn, “Hydrodynamic behavior of HBX-1 and equation of state of the detonation products below the Chapman-Jouguet state,” in: Proc. 5th Symp. (Int.) on Detonation, ACR. 1-84, Passadena (1970), pp. 523–532.

  24. A. R. Clairmont, PBX’s in Large Navy Munitions Program, Vol. 7: Cylinder Expansion Testing, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Tech. Report No. 80-43, Maryland (1988).

  25. N. L. Coleburn and T. Liddiard, “Hugoniot equation of state of several unreacted explosives,” J. Chem. Phys., 44, No. 5, 1929–1936 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. T. N. Hall and J. R. Holden, “Navy explosives handbook, explosion effects and properties. Part III: Properties of explosives and explosive compositions,” Naval Surface Warfare Center, MP 88-116, Dahegren, India (2000).

  27. C. J. Anderson and P. Katsabanis, “Evaluation of heat of detonation, Final report,” Mining Resource Engineering Limited, Prepared for Defence Research Establishment Valcartier, Kingston, Ontario, April (2000).

  28. C. J. Anderson and P. Katsabanis, “Heat of detonation: Part II, Final report,” Mining Resource Engineering Limited, Prepared for Defence Research Establishment Valcartier, Kingston, Ontario, May (2001).

  29. H. P. Dorsett, P. Brosseau, and M. D. Cliff, “The influence of ultrafine aluminium upon explosives detonation,” in: 28th Int. Pyrotechnic Seminar, Adelaide, South Australia (2001), pp. 239–244.

  30. Engineering Design Handbook: Explosives Series Properties of Military Interest, Army Material Command, Pamphlet AMCP 706-177, Washington (1971), p. 193.

  31. M. F. Gogulya, A. Yu. Dolgoborodov, M. A. Brazhnikov, and G. Baudin, “Detonation waves in HMX/Al mixtures (pressure and temperature measurement),” in: Proc. 11th Int. Detonation Symp., Snowmass, Colorado (1998), pp. 979–988.

  32. M. F. Gogulya, M. N. Makhov, A. Yu. Dolgoborodov, et al., “Mechanical sensitivity and detonation parameters of aluminized explosives,” Combust., Expl., Shock Waves, 37, No. 4, 445–457 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. M. J. Stosz, “Development of new explosives for the US Navy,” in: 13th Int. Annu. Conf. of ICT (1982), pp. 257–275.

  34. I. J. Lochert, R. M. Dexter, and B. L. Hamshere, “Evaluation of Australian RDX in PBXN-109,” DSTOTN-0440, Edinburgh, South Australia (2002).

  35. T. Keicher, G. Langer, T. Rohe, et al., “Herstellung und Charakterisierung von Unterwasserpreng-stiffen,” in: Proc. 30th Int. Annu. Conf. of ICT (1999), pp. 121-1–121-12.

  36. P. Wanninger, “Empfindlichkeit von Explosivestoffen und Ladungen gegen Beschuss,” in: Proc. 22nd Int. Annu. Conf. of ICT (1991), pp. 5-1–5-23.

  37. E. Kleinschmidt, “Empfindliche Explosivstoffe — eine Getahr für die Umwelt?” in: Proc. 24th Int. Annu. Conf. of ICT, 26-1–26-24 (1993).

  38. W. Arnold and H. Muthig, “KS22a, the insensitive high for hard target defeat applications,” in: Insensitive Munitions and Energetic Materials Technology Symp., Orlando (2003).

  39. Vinay Prakash (Mrs), V. K. Phadke, R. K. Sinha, and H. Singh, “Influence of Al on performance of HTPB based aluminised PBXs,” Sci. Def. J., 54, No. 4, 475–482 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  40. F. Volk and F. Schedlbauer, “Detonation products of less sensitive high explosives formed under different pressures of argon and in vacuum,” in: Proc. 9th Symp. (Int.) Detonation, Portland (1989), pp. 962–964.

  41. P. A. Jemmett and N. Davies, “Mechanical and chemical characterisation of a polymer bonded explosive during aging,” in: Proc. 31st Int. Pyrotechnics Seminar, Fort Collins, Colorado (2004), pp. 679–685.

  42. P. Cheese, P. Barnes, M. Sharp, et al., “Studies on the effect of aging on a UK range of polymer bonded explosives,” in: Insensitive Munitions and Energetic Materials Symp., Event No. 5550, Hilston (2004).

  43. Hui Huang and Haishan Dong, “Studies on low vulnerable high explosives,” in: Chen Lang and Feng Changgen (eds.), Theory and Practice Energetic Materials, Proc. 4th Int. Autumn Seminar on Propellants, Explosives and Pyrotechnics, Sha oxing, China (2001), pp. 12–18.

  44. S. K. Poehlein, D. Burch, R. Johnson, et al., “Requalification of demilitarized HMX for military use,” in: Proc. 36th Int. Annu. Conf. of ICT (2005), pp. 8-1–8-13.

  45. T. C. McGregor, K. A. Clark, M. Beyard, and K. Sandagger, “Requalification of demilitarized HMX for DOD/DOE applications,” in: Insensitive Munitions and Energetic Materials Technology Symp., Bristol (2006).

  46. M. A. Radwan, “Explosive characteristics of aluminized plastic bonded explosives based on octogen and polyurethane binder,” in: 32nd Int. Annu. Conf. ICT (2001), pp. 44-1–44-9.

  47. J.-S. Lee and C.-K. Hsu, “Thermal properties and shelf life of HMX-HTPB based plastic-bonded explosives,” Thermochim. Acta, 393, 153–156 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hwu Wen-Hwa, Cheng Chin-Sheng, and Huang Chen-Chia, “Study on thermal decomposition of PCP/AP/RDX propellants,” in: Proc. 24th Int. Annu. Conf. of ICT (1993), pp. 80-1–80-14.

  49. B. S. Min, G. Baek, and S. W. Ko, “Characterization of polyether-type GAP and PEG blend matrices prepared with varying ratios of different curatives,” J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 13, No. 3, 373–379 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  50. W. H. Wilson, J. W. Forbes, P. K. Gustavson, and G. T. Sutherland, “Experimental study of detonation in PBXW-123, a large failure-diameter, non-ideal explosive,” in: Proc. 10th Int. Detonation Symp., Boston (1993), pp. 63–68.

  51. P. Sjoberg, H. Hytti, R. Strandberg, A. Krariniemi, and M. Muilu, “PBX with insensitive RDX, a new EIDS substance for underwater use,” in: Proc. 33rd Int. Annu. Conf. of ICT (2002), pp. 16-1–161-12.

  52. J. W. Lec, J. Lee, J. H. Kuk, et al., “Air blast measurement of an aluminised explosive,” in: Minutes of 25th Explosive Safety Seminar, Vol. I, Anaheim (1992), pp. 429–451.

    Google Scholar 

  53. J. Mala, J. Groux, and Y. Bigot, “Detonation properties of insensitive cast PBX’s at low temperature,” in: Proc. 11th Int. Detonation Symp., Snowmass (1998), pp. 384–390.

  54. M. Held, “Steady state detonation velocity D ∞ of infinite radius derived from small samples,” Propell., Explos. Pyrotech., 17, No. 6, 275–277 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. M. J. Stosz, “Advanced development of insensitive PBX’s for less vulnerable munitions,” in: Minutes of 20th Explosive Safety Seminar, Norfolk (1982), pp. 1165–1191.

  56. G. Baudin and A. Bergues, “Reaction model for aluminised PBX applied to underwater explosion calculations,” in: Proc. 10th Int. Detonation Symp., Boston (1993), pp. 646–655.

  57. M. W. Smith and M. D. Cliff, “NTO-based explosive formulations: A technology review,” DSTO-TR-0796, Salisbury, South Australia (1999).

  58. M. R. Senn, K. E. Newman, T. E. Wise, and W. S. Jones, “Chemicals and processing assessment of candidate explosives for the advanced bomb family,” IHTR-1370, Naval Ordnance Station (1990).

  59. R. L. Spear, I. J. Dagley, and P. Whitty, “Options for future RAAF GP bombs meeting IM and/or HD 1.6 Criteria,” DSTO-CIC-0001, Aeronautical and Maritime Res. Lab., Melbourne, Australia (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  60. L. T. Wilson, D. R. Reedal, and B. M. Simpson, “Comparison of PBXW-126 and PBXC-129 for use in large fragmenting warheads,” in: Insensitive Munitions and Energetic Materials Technology Symp., Event No. 854, National Defense Industrial Association (1997).

  61. M. J. Murphy, R. L. Simpson, P. A. Urtiew, et al., “Reactive flow model development for PBXW-126 using modern nonlinear optimization methods,” in: S. C. Schmidt and W. C. Tao (eds.), Topical Group on Shock Compression of Condensed Matter, Conf. of the Amer. Phys. Soc. (Washington, August 13–18, 1995), AIP Press, New York (1995), pp. 417–420. (Am. Inst. of Phys. Conf. Proc.; Vol. 370.)

    Google Scholar 

  62. A. Be’cuwe, A. Delclos, and J. Isler, “EIDS high explosives for 1.6 munitions,” in: Proc. Int. Symp. on Energetic Materials Technology, Meeting No. 680, Am. Defence Preparedness Association, Phoenix (1995), pp. 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  63. B. Nouguez, “Dual Formulation Warheads: A mature technology,” in: Insensitive Munitions Technology Symp., Meeting No. 471, Am. Defence Preparedness Association, Virginia (1994), pp. 280–287.

    Google Scholar 

  64. J. Leathy, “PBXW-126, an insensitive explosive for general purpose bombs,” ibid., pp. 517–523.

    Google Scholar 

  65. G. Langer, T. Keicher, W. Ehrhardt, et al., “The influence of particle size of AP and Al on the performances of underwater explosives,” in: Proc. 34th Int. Annu. Conf. of ICT (2003), pp. 12-1–12-16.

  66. N. Johnson, P. Carpenter, K. Newman, et al., “Evaluation of explosive candidates for a thermobaric M72 law shoulder launched weapon,” in: NDIA 39th Annu. Gun and Ammunition/Missiles and Rockets Conf. (2004).

  67. S. Hall and G. D. Knowlton, “Development, characterisation and testing of high blast thermobaric compositions,” in: Proc. 31st Int. Pyrotech. Seminar, Fort Collins (2004), pp. 663–678.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. High Energy Materials Research Laboratory, Pune, 411021, India

    P. P. Vadhe, R. B. Pawar, R. K. Sinha, S. N. Asthana & A. Subhananda Rao

Authors
  1. P. P. Vadhe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. B. Pawar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. K. Sinha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. N. Asthana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Subhananda Rao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. P. Vadhe.

Additional information

__________

Translated from Fizika Goreniya i Vzryva, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 98–115, July–August, 2008.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vadhe, P.P., Pawar, R.B., Sinha, R.K. et al. Cast aluminized explosives (review). Combust Explos Shock Waves 44, 461–477 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10573-008-0073-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10573-008-0073-2

Key words

Search

Navigation