Skip to main content
Log in

Are the analytical proper elements of asteroids still needed?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The asteroid proper elements computed from an analytical secular perturbation theory are thought to be of inferior accuracy with respect to the synthetic proper elements computed by means of a purely numerical procedure. To verify this, we carried out two different tests: one based on a plain comparison of the analytical and synthetic proper elements to check whether they differ by more than the corresponding errors of synthetic elements, and the other consisting in direct determination of instabilities of analytical elements themselves. In both tests, we used much larger samples than in the previous attempts. The results clearly confirm the superior quality of synthetic values. We also present a new synthetic method to determine the locations of secular resonances, based on a polynomial fit of the values of asteroid secular rates gs, and subsequent computation of resonance frequencies on a grid in the phase space of proper elements. Plots showing the contour lines corresponding to selected small values of resonant divisors serve to visualize the resonance locations. We analyzed in detail the accuracy of the fit and of the secular resonance locations, comparing them with the previously available positions determined by means of the analytical theory; we found that the two methods give qualitatively the same results, but that the results of the new synthetic method appear to be more reliable. In view of the above results, we conclude that the regular maintenance of the catalog of analytical proper elements can be discontinued in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://hamilton.dm.unipi.it/astdys2.

  2. The median standard deviations of synthetic proper elements amount, respectively, to \(\sim 10^{-6}\), \(\sim 2\times 10^{-4}\), \(\sim 10^{-4}\).

  3. More than 80% of synthetic proper elements have standard deviations less than the average STDs of their analytical counterparts found by Milani and Knežević (1994) as reported in Sect. 2.1.

  4. An obvious advantage of the polynomial fit method is the possibility to easily add higher-degree monomials, without making the method much more complex.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Andrea Milani, who passed away in the course of its preparation. It is very appropriate that the paper appears in the CM&DA Golden Topical Collection issue, as it was our intention with this paper to round off and terminate the research on asteroid analytical proper elements which we commenced with the first paper devoted to this topic published in CM&DA nearly 30 years ago. Gratitude goes to the referees V. Carubba and A. Morbidelli for many useful suggestions that helped improving the original manuscript. ZK acknowledges support through the Projects F-187 of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, and OI176011 of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Serbia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zoran Knežević.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection on 50 years of Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy Guest Editors: Editorial Committee.

A. Milani: passed away in the course of preparation of the paper for publishing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Knežević, Z., Milani, A. Are the analytical proper elements of asteroids still needed?. Celest Mech Dyn Astr 131, 27 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-019-9906-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-019-9906-4

Keywords

Navigation