Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Examining the Association Between Digital Stress Components and Psychological Wellbeing: A Meta-Analysis

  • Published:
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extant research suggests that digital stress (DS) and its various components (Hall et al. in Psychol Assess 33(3):230–242, 2021) may mediate the association between social media use and psychosocial distress among adolescents and young adults. Yet no systematic review and meta-analysis has been conducted to examine the direct associations among DS components (i.e., approval anxiety, availability stress, fear of missing out [FOMO], connection overload, and online vigilance) and psychological outcomes. Thus, we aimed to comprehensively synthesize and quantify the association between these five DS components and psychosocial distress, and to examine whether these associations were statistically different from one another. Our search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Communication and Mass Media Complete yielded a wide range of article abstracts across the five DS components. After reviewing inclusion and exclusion criteria, 7, 73, 60, 19, and 16 studies were included for availability stress, approval anxiety, FOMO, connection overload, and online vigilance, respectively. The results suggested that all five digital stress components had significant medium association with psychosocial distress (r = .26 to .34; p < .001). Age and sex did not significantly moderate the association between most digital stress components and psychosocial distress. However, age moderated the association between connection overload and psychosocial distress. Our findings further suggested no statistical differences among the associations between the five digital stress components and psychosocial distress. Notwithstanding its limitations, our outcomes help integrate the disparate effect sizes in the literature, indicate the strength of associations, and suggest directions for clinical intervention and future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Notably, there is a substantial difference in the summary effect sizes between primary and secondary aim for connection overload and online vigilance. For connection overload there was a .04 decrease in effect size between the primary and secondary aim and for online vigilance there was a .07 increase. Since we excluded three studies for connection overload and two for online vigilance to protect the statistical power of availability stress, it can be inferred that the excluded studies were substantially influencing the effect size for these factors.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Neal Kingston for helping with conceptualization and problemsolving during statistical analysis. Special thanks to Avery Poindexter, Versha Rajvani, Claire Pursell, and Caitlyn Browne for reviewing articles in full text and helping with initial coding of article abstracts.

Funding

Neither of the authors has a financial or personal relationship between themselves, their families, and/or others that might be perceived by readers as biasing our work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ric G. Steele.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests, financial or otherwise.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khetawat, D., Steele, R.G. Examining the Association Between Digital Stress Components and Psychological Wellbeing: A Meta-Analysis. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 26, 957–974 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-023-00440-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-023-00440-9

Keywords

Navigation