Skip to main content
Log in

Considering 3D topography of endothelial folds to improve cell count of organ cultured corneas

  • Published:
Cell and Tissue Banking Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The posterior side of the cornea is covered by the endothelial monolayer, which governs corneal transparency but cannot proliferate. Determination of endothelial cell density (ECD) is therefore the minimal and mandatory quality control in all eye banks. It avoids primary graft failures caused by endothelial insufficiency, and allows allocation of corneas to surgical techniques requiring different numbers of endothelial cells (ECs). Corneas stored in organ culture (17% of grafts worldwide), are characterized by heavy stromal swelling and numerous deep endothelial folds, up to 200 µm high. During microscopic en face observation, flat surfaces are thus exceptional and EC counting is biased by parallax errors, resulting in overestimated eye bank ECD (ebECD). We used a motorized transmitted light microscope to acquire Z-stacks of images every 10 µm, and processed them to reconstruct the 3D surface of the folded endothelium. This method (3D-ECD) takes into account the local point-by-point slope in order to correct ECD. On a set of 30 corneas, we compared 3D-ECD and ebECD determined on five identical zones at the center of the cornea. 3D reconstruction allowed us to visualize twice as many cells, and ebECD was 8.1 ± 4.5% (95%CI 6.4–9.7) higher than 3D-ECD, with 1744 ± 488 versus 1606 ± 473 cells/mm2. 3D counting makes it possible to increase cell sampling and to correct overestimation by the conventional en face counting still routinely performed in eye banks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acquart S et al (2010) Endothelial morphometry by image analysis of corneas organ cultured at 31 degrees C. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:1356–1364. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-3103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguet F, Van De Ville D, Unser M (2008) Model-based 2.5-d deconvolution for extended depth of field in brightfield microscopy. IEEE Trans Image Process Publ IEEE Sign Process Soc 17:1144–1153. doi:10.1109/TIP.2008.924393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage WJ, Dick AD, Bourne WM (2003) Predicting endothelial cell loss and long-term corneal graft survival. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:3326–3331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard A, Gavet Y, Hor G, Klossa J, Gauthier AS, Gain P, Thuret G (2016) 3D images of the endothelial surface to increase accuracy of cell count in eye banks. IRBM. doi:10.1016/j.irbm.2016.02.011

    Google Scholar 

  • Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campolmi N et al (2014) Comparison of endothelial cell density of organ cultured corneas with cornea donor study. Cornea 33:597–603. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deb-Joardar N, Thuret G, Gavet Y, Acquart S, Garraud O, Egelhoffer H, Gain P (2007a) Reproducibility of endothelial assessment during corneal organ culture: comparison of a computer-assisted analyzer with manual methods. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:2062–2067. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb-Joardar N, Thuret G, Zhao M, Acquart S, Peoc’h M, Garraud O, Gain P (2007b) Comparison of two semiautomated methods for evaluating endothelial cells of eye bank corneas. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:3077–3082. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEBA (2016) European eye bank association directory. Twenty-fourth edition. 2016

  • Gain P et al (2002a) Automated analyser of organ cultured corneal endothelial mosaic. J Fr Ophtalmol 25:462–472

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gain P et al (2002b) Automated tri-image analysis of stored corneal endothelium. Br J Ophthalmol 86:801–808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gain P, Jullienne R, He Z, Aldossary M, Acquart S, Cognasse F, Thuret G (2016) Global survey of corneal transplantation and eye banking. JAMA Ophthalmol 134:167–173. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier AS et al (2016) Very early endothelial cell loss after penetrating keratoplasty with organ-cultured corneas. Br J Ophthalmol. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309615

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jullienne R, Manoli P, Tiffet T, He Z, Rannou K, Thuret G, Gain P (2015) Corneal endothelium self-healing mathematical model after inadvertent descemetorhexis. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:2313–2318. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lagali N et al (2010) Donor and recipient endothelial cell population of the transplanted human cornea: a two-dimensional imaging study. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:1898–1904. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-4066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lass JH et al (2010) Endothelial cell density to predict endothelial graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 128:63–69

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nejepinska J, Juklova K, Jirsova K (2010) Organ culture, but not hypothermic storage, facilitates the repair of the corneal endothelium following mechanical damage. Acta Ophthalmol 88:413–419. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01490.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price MO, Calhoun P, Kollman C, Price FW, Lass JH (2016) Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. ten-year endothelial cell loss compared with penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 123:1421–1427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi Y, Kasahara T (1996) Method for computing morphology of cornea endothelium cells. Google Patents

  • Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, Hoar KL, Phillips PM, Friend DJ (2008) Endothelial keratoplasty: the influence of preoperative donor endothelial cell densities on dislocation, primary graft failure, and 1-year cell counts. Cornea 27:1131–1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Cassandra Dubesset and Chantal Perrache for their technical assistance.

Funding

French National Research Agency for financial support (ANR-12-TECS-004, CorImMo 3D) in partnership with the company Tribvn, Châtillon, France.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilles Thuret.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jumelle, C., Garcin, T., Gauthier, A.S. et al. Considering 3D topography of endothelial folds to improve cell count of organ cultured corneas. Cell Tissue Bank 18, 185–191 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-017-9624-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-017-9624-7

Keywords

Navigation