Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term result of autologous cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation for severe ocular surface disease

  • Published:
Cell and Tissue Banking Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of autologous cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation (COMET) on human amniotic membrane (AM) for corneal limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). In this prospective, noncomparative case series, 20 eyes (18 patients) with bilateral severe ocular surface disease were chosen to undergo COMET on human AM. The primary outcome was clinical success, and the secondary outcomes were the best-corrected visual acuity difference, corneal opacification, symblepharon formation, and complications. The mean patient age was 48.2 ± 15.5 years. The mean follow-up time was 31.9 ± 12.1 months (range 8–50 months). All except one eye exhibited complete epithelialization within the first postoperative week. A successful clinical outcome, defined as a stable ocular surface without epithelial defects, a clear cornea without fibrovascular tissue invasion at the pupillary area, and no or mild ocular surface inflammation, was obtained in 15 of 20 eyes (75 %). The clinical success rate at 1 year was 79.3 %, and that at 4 years (end of follow-up) was 70.5 %. Fourteen of 20 (70 %) eyes exhibited improvement in visual acuity after COMET, and some required subsequent cataract surgery (2 eyes), penetrating keratoplasty (3 eyes), or keratoprosthesis implantation (1 eye). Preoperative symblepharon was eliminated in most eyes (8 of 13, 61.5 %) after COMET combined with eyelid reconstruction when needed. The only complication was corneal perforation (1 eye) induced by a severe eyelid abnormality; treatment with a tectonic corneal graft was successful. COMET can successfully restore ocular surface damage in most eyes with corneal LSCD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen HC, Yeh LK, Tsai YJ, Lai CH, Chen CC, Lai JY et al (2012) Expression of angiogenesis-related factors in human corneas after cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:5615–5623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dua HS, Azuara-Blanco A (2000a) Limbal stem cells of the corneal epithelium. Surv Ophthalmol 44:415–425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dua HS, Saini JS, Azuara-Blanco A, Gupta P (2000b) Limbal stem cell deficiency: concept, aetiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management. Indian J Ophthalmol 48:83–92

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ilmarinen T, Laine J, Juuti-Uusitalo K, Numminen J, Seppanen-Suuronen R, Uusitalo H et al (2013) Towards a defined, serum- and feeder-free culture of stratified human oral mucosal epithelium for ocular surface reconstruction. Acta Ophthalmol 91:744–750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inatomi T, Nakamura T, Koizumi N, Sotozono C, Yokoi N, Kinoshita S (2006) Midterm results on ocular surface reconstruction using cultivated autologous oral mucosal epithelial transplantation. Am J Ophthalmol 141:267–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanayama S, Nishida K, Yamato M, Hayashi R, Sugiyama H, Soma T et al (2007) Analysis of angiogenesis induced by cultured corneal and oral mucosal epithelial cell sheets in vitro. Exp Eye Res 85:772–781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanayama S, Nishida K, Yamato M, Hayashi R, Maeda N, Okano T et al (2009) Analysis of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 secreted from cultured corneal and oral mucosal epithelial cell sheets in vitro. Br J Ophthalmol 93:263–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinoshita S, Koizumi N, Nakamura T (2004a) Transplantable cultivated mucosal epithelial sheet for ocular surface reconstruction. Exp Eye Res 78:483–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinoshita S, Koizumi N, Sotozono C, Yamada J, Nakamura T, Inatomi T (2004b) Concept and clinical application of cultivated epithelial transplantation for ocular surface disorders. Ocul Surf 2:21–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koizumi NJ, Inatomi TJ, Sotozono CJ, Fullwood NJ, Quantock AJ, Kinoshita S (2000) Growth factor mRNA and protein in preserved human amniotic membrane. Curr Eye Res 20:173–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koizumi N, Inatomi T, Suzuki T, Sotozono C, Kinoshita S (2001) Cultivated corneal epithelial stem cell transplantation in ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology 108:1569–1574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura T, Inatomi T, Sotozono C, Amemiya T, Kanamura N, Kinoshita S (2004) Transplantation of cultivated autologous oral mucosal epithelial cells in patients with severe ocular surface disorders. Br J Ophthalmol 88:1280–1284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura T, Takeda K, Inatomi T, Sotozono C, Kinoshita S (2011) Long-term results of autologous cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation in the scar phase of severe ocular surface disorders. Br J Ophthalmol 95:942–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nishida K, Yamato M, Hayashida Y, Watanabe K, Yamamoto K, Adachi E et al (2004) Corneal reconstruction with tissue-engineered cell sheets composed of autologous oral mucosal epithelium. N Engl J Med 351:1187–1196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pauklin M, Fuchsluger TA, Westekemper H, Steuhl KP, Meller D (2010) Midterm results of cultivated autologous and allogeneic limbal epithelial transplantation in limbal stem cell deficiency. Dev Ophthalmol 45:57–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhasawat P (2006) Corneal limbal stem cells. Siriraj Med J 56:728–729

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhasawat P, Kosrirukvongs P, Booranapong W, Vajaradul Y (2000) Application of preserved human amniotic membrane for corneal surface reconstruction. Cell Tissue Bank 1:213–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhasawat P, Tesavibul N, Komolsuradej W (2001) Single and multilayer amniotic membrane transplantation for persistent corneal epithelial defect with and without stromal thinning and perforation. Br J Ophthalmol 85:1455–1463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhasawat P, Ekpo P, Uiprasertkul M, Chotikavanich S, Tesavibul N (2012) Efficacy of cultivated corneal epithelial stem cells for ocular surface reconstruction. Clin Ophthalmol 6:1483–1492

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rama P, Matuska S, Paganoni G, Spinelli A, De Luca M, Pellegrini G (2010) Limbal stem-cell therapy and long-term corneal regeneration. N Engl J Med 363:147–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sangwan VS, Matalia HP, Vemuganti GK, Fatima A, Ifthekar G, Singh S et al (2006) Clinical outcome of autologous cultivated limbal epithelium transplantation. Indian J Ophthalmol 54:29–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Satake Y, Higa K, Tsubota K, Shimazaki J (2011) Long-term outcome of cultivated oral mucosal epithelial sheet transplantation in treatment of total limbal stem cell deficiency. Ophthalmology 118:1524–1530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scully C, Bagan J (2008) Oral mucosal diseases: erythema multiforme. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:90–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sekiyama E, Nakamura T, Kawasaki S, Sogabe H, Kinoshita S (2006) Different expression of angiogenesis-related factors between human cultivated corneal and oral epithelial sheets. Exp Eye Res 83:741–746

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shimazaki J, Aiba M, Goto E, Kato N, Shimmura S, Tsubota K (2002) Transplantation of human limbal epithelium cultivated on amniotic membrane for the treatment of severe ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology 109:1285–1290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shortt AJ, Secker GA, Notara MD, Limb GA, Khaw PT, Tuft SJ et al (2007) Transplantation of ex vivo cultured limbal epithelial stem cells: a review of techniques and clinical results. Surv Ophthalmol 52:483–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sotozono C, Inatomi T, Nakamura T, Koizumi N, Yokoi N, Ueta M et al (2013) Visual improvement after cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation. Ophthalmology 120:193–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sotozono C, Inatomi T, Nakamura T, Koizumi N, Yokoi N, Ueta M et al (2014) Cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation for persistent epithelial defect in severe ocular surface diseases with acute inflammatory activity. Acta Ophthalmol 92:e447–e453

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng SCG, Sun TT (1999) Stem cells: ocular surface maintenance. In: Brightbill FS (ed) Corneal surgery: theory, technique, and tissue, 3rd edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsubota K, Toda I, Saito H, Shinozaki N, Shimazaki J (1995) Reconstruction of the corneal epithelium by limbal allograft transplantation for severe ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology 102:1486–1496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Assistant Professor Chulaluk Komoltri, Dr. PH (Biostatistics) and Pimrapat Tengtrakulcharoen, MBH from the Office for Research and Development for their assistance with the statistical analysis. The authors also thank Mathuwan Srikong and Kritphol Rattanawarinchai from the Medical Education Technology Center, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University for preparing the figures.

Funding

The study was supported by the Thailand Research Fund and Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pinnita Prabhasawat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The Committee for the Protection of Human Participants in Research at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand (Siriraj ethics committee number 639/2551(EC2)) approved the study. Adults with LSCD who were willing to comply with the protocol provided written informed consent before enrollment.

Appendix: Reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (Table 3)

Appendix: Reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (Table 3)

RT

Total RNA from cultured epithelium was used as a template for cDNA synthesis by reverse transcription using a SuperScript® III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The RNA template (500 ng) was mixed with 1 µl of 50-µM oligo (dT)15 and 1 µl of 10-mM dNTP mix, and nuclease-free water was then added to a final volume of 10 µl. The mixture was incubated at 65°C for 5 min and then placed on ice for 1 min. The cDNA synthesis mix (2 µl of 10× RT buffer, 4 µl of 25 mM MgCl2, 1 µl of 0.1 M DTT, 1 µl of 40-unit/μl RNaseOUT™, and 1 μl of 200-unit/μl SuperScript™ III RT) was gently added, mixed, and incubated at 50°C for 50 min and then at 85°C for 5 min to inactivate the enzyme activity. The cDNA was stored at −20 °C until PCR amplification.

PCR

The cDNA used as a template for each PCR amplification was amplified using reagents supplied in the Taq polymerase kit (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA). The PCR amplification reaction was performed using 30 cycles at 95 °C for 1 min, 53 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 3 min, with a final extension step of 72 °C for 10 min. The amplification cycle was performed in a thermal cycler (PE Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA). The PCR products were analyzed by 1.5 % DNA gel electrophoresis.

Agarose gel electrophoresis

The PCR products were mixed with 6X DNA loading buffer (10 µl of PCR product per 2 µl of 6× loading buffer). The band intensity was determined by electrophoresis using a 2 % agarose gel and visualized with a UV transilluminator after ethidium bromide staining.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prabhasawat, P., Ekpo, P., Uiprasertkul, M. et al. Long-term result of autologous cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation for severe ocular surface disease. Cell Tissue Bank 17, 491–503 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-016-9575-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-016-9575-4

Keywords

Navigation