Skip to main content
Log in

Adolescent Adaptation to Parental Incarceration

  • Published:
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This qualitative transcendental phenomenological study considered the lived experience of having a parent or parental figure incarcerated during one’s adolescence. The study analyzed 15 in-depth, in-person, semi-structured interviews with six participants between the ages of 18 and 29 from the city of Chicago. Textural-structural analysis indicated five separate results: the influence of parental incarceration on the developmental experience, the emotional influence of parental incarceration, the social influence of parental incarceration, the spiritual influence of parental incarceration, and the three key aspects of the experience (truth, the kind of relationship the participant had with the incarcerated parent, and the availability of an attuned subsequent caregiver). The analysis indicated that an adolescent’s adaptation to the world after experiencing this phenomenon fell into one of three spheres of adaptation. A number of clinical and social justice implications were identified along with avenues for future research to better understand the phenomenon and how it affects those who experience it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the interest of clarity, going forward “parent” is used to stand in for both parent and parental figure.

  2. The online version of the Miller-Keane Encyclopedia and Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing, and Allied Health (2003) defines adaptation as the following: “a dynamic, ongoing, life-sustaining process by which living organisms adjust to environmental changes” (Miller-Keane Encyclopedia and Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing, and Allied Health, 2003). This article uses this definition of adaptation.

  3. This study defined incarceration based on the current literature. Incarceration was considered as serving a sentence of two years or longer in a state or federal prison (Crayton, Ressler, Mukamal, Jannetta, & Warwick, 2010). The general public commonly uses the terms “jail” and “prison” interchangeably. However, there are major differences between the terms. The presented study used the following definitions: Jail is a place that holds people for a short amount of time when they have been arrested but not convicted of crimes. State or federal prison is a place that houses individuals who have been tried and convicted of crimes (Crayton, Ressler, Mukamal, Jannetta, & Warwick, 2010)

  4. The presented study used the following definition of subsequent caregivers based on the current literature: A subsequent caregiver, sometimes known as kinship care, is considered to be a grandparent, other parent, family relative, foster care agencies, foster homes, or friends who nurture and protect the child and who are there for the child full time (Glaze & Maruschak, 2008; Mumola, 2000; A. Smith, Krisman, Strozier, & Marley, 2004).

  5. CPD (2014) defines the following crimes as Index Crimes: homicide (first and second degrees), criminal sexual assault, robbery, aggravated assault, aggravated battery, burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft, and arson.

  6. CPD (2014) defines the following crimes as Non-Index Crimes: involuntary manslaughter, simple assault, simple battery, forgery and counterfeiting, fraud, embezzlement, stolen property, vandalism, weapons violation, prostitution, criminal sexual abuse, drug abuse, gambling, offenses against family, liquor license, disorderly conduct, and miscellaneous non-index offenses (violations of laws or ordinances).

References

  • Arditti, J. A. (2012). Parental incarceration and the family: Psychological and social effects of imprisonment on children, parents, and caregivers. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blos, P. (1962). On adolescence: A psychoanalytic interpretation. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudin, K., & Zeller-Berkman, S. (2010). Children of promise. In Y. R. Harris, J. A. Graham & G. J. O. Carpenter (Eds.), Children of incarcerated parents: Theoretical, developmental, and clinical issues (pp. 73–101). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, E. A. (2015). Prisoners in 2014. (No. NCJ 248955). U.S. Department of Justice: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

  • Chicago Police Department. (2014). CLEARmaps: Citizen law enforcement analysis and reporting. Retrieved June 24, 2014 from http://gis.chicagopolice.org/CLEARMap_crime_sums/startPage.htm.

  • Crayton, A., Ressler, L., Mukamal, D. A., Jannetta, J., & Warwick, K. (2010). Partnering with jails to improve reentry: A guidebook for community-based organizations.. Washington D.C.: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaze, L. E., & Maruschak, L. M. (2008). Parents in person and their minor children. (No. NCJ 222984). Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairston, C. F. (2003). Prisoners and their families: Parenting issues during incarceration. In J. Travis & M. Waul (Eds.), Prisoners once removed: The impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families, and communities (pp. 259–282). Washington D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairston, C. F. (2007). Focus on children with incarcerated parents: An overview of the research literature. Toronto, Canada: Annie E. Casey Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon, T. E., Carswell, S. B., & Rose, M. (2007). Research on the caretaking of children of incarcerated parents: Findings and their service delivery implications. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 348–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, B. M., & Gustafson, R. (2007). The effect of maternal incarceration on adult offspring involvement in the criminal justice system. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D. (1995). Effects of parental incarceration. In K. Gabel & D. Johnston (Eds.), Children of incarcerated parents (pp. 59–88). New York: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. H. (1991). Adolescents, age 15 to 18: A psychoanalytic developmental view. In S. I. Greenspan & G. H. Pollock (Eds.), The course of life volume four: Adolescence (pp. 201–233). Madison: International Universities Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautz, S. V. (2017). Making sense: The untold stories of parental incarceration during one’s adolescence. Manuscript in preparation for dissertation defense.

  • Kinner, S. A., Alati, R., Najman, J. M., & Williams, G. M. (2007). Do parental arrest and imprisonment lead to child behavior problems and substance use? A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 1148–1156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lidz, T. (1983). Chapter 10: Adolescence. The person: His and her development throughout the life cycle (pp. 306–375). New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, C. (2005). Loving through bars: Children with parents in prison. Santa Monica: Santa Monica Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller-Keane Encyclopedia and Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing, & Allied Health. (2003). Adaptation. Retrieved from http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Psychological+adaptation.

  • Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mumola, C. J. (2000). Incarcerated parents and their children. (No. 182335). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. (2010). Longitudinal research on the effects of parental incarceration on children. In J. M. Eddy & J. Poehlmann (Eds.), Children of incarcerated parents: A handbook for researchers and practitioners (pp. 55–74). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2008). Parental imprisonment: Long lasting effects on boys’ internalizing problems through the life course. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 273–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J., & Murray, L. (2010). Parental incarceration, attachment, and child psychopathology. Attachment and Human Development, 12(4), 289–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nesmith, A., & Ruhland, E. (2008). Children of incarcerated parents: Challenges and resiliency, in their own words. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 1119–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesmith, A., & Ruhland, E. (2011). Caregivers of children with incarcerated parents. The Open Family Studies Journal, 4, 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parke, R. D., & Clarke-Stewart, K. A. (2003). The effects of parental incarceration on children: Perspectives, promises, and polices. In J. Travis & M. Waul (Eds.), Prisoners once removed: The impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families, and communities (pp. 189–232). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poehlmann, J., Dallaire, D., Loper, A. B., & Shear, L. D. (2010). Children’s contact with their incarcerated parents: Research findings and recommendations. American Psychologist, 65(6), 575–598.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In R. S. Valle & S. Halling (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology: Exploring the breadth of human experience (pp. 41–60). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J. B., & Eddy, J. M. (2002). Developmental effects of parental incarceration on adolescents (over age 11). “From Prison to Home” Conference, Virginia. (pp. 15–17).

  • Shlafer, R. J., & Poehlmann, J. (2010). Adolescence in the context of parental incarceration: Family, school, and community factors. In J. M. Eddy & J. Poehlmann (Eds.), Children of incarcerated parents: A handbook for researchers and practitioners (pp. 121–140). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. A. (2011). Disrupted childhoods: Children of women in prison. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., Krisman, K., Strozier, A. L., & Marley, M. A. (2004). Breaking through the bars: Exploring the experiences of addicted incarcerated parents whose children are cared for by relatives. Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 85, 187–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretive phenomenological analysis: Theory, method, and research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todis, B., Bullis, M., Waintrup, M., Schultz, R., & D’Ambrosio, R. (2001). Overcoming the odds: Qualitative examination of resilience among formerly incarcerated adolescents. Exceptional Children, 68(1), 119–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travis, J., & Waul, M. (2003). Prisoners once removed: The children and families of prisoners. In J. Travis & M. Waul (Eds.), Prisoners once removed: The impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families, and communities (pp. 1–29). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. E. (1993). Risk, resilience, and recovery: Perspectives from the Kauai longitudinal study. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 503–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. E. (2000). Protective factors and individual resilience. In J. P. Shonkoff & S. J. Meisels (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (2nd edn., pp. 115–132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank her disseration chair, James N. Lampe Ph.D., and dissertation committee for their guidance throughout the project. A special thanks to Ida Roldan Ph.D and Denise Duval Tsioles Ph.D. for your comments and notes on the project.

Funding

This study did not receive any funding from grants or patrons. This study was self-funded, as it was part of a doctoral program

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Vernon Kautz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest, since the first author is the sole author.

Ethical approval

At the time of submission, the data presented in the article is part of a dissertation manuscript written for completion of a doctoral program at the Institute for Clinical Social Work. At this time, the author has not yet defended this thesis; therefore, the Institute for Clinical Social Work as an institution has not fully vetted the completed project. This study involved human research participants, and ethical approval was received prior to the start of the study. All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kautz, S.V. Adolescent Adaptation to Parental Incarceration. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 34, 557–572 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-017-0493-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-017-0493-5

Keywords

Navigation