Skip to main content
Log in

Chest Compression Force of Trained and Untrained CPR Rescuers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Engineering

Abstract

The objective of this study was to measure the force exerted by 83 trained CPR rescuers and 104 untrained adult laypersons (college students and staff). A bathroom scale was used to measure the force exerted by these subjects with their hands on the bathroom scale in the CPR position. The weight range for both groups was the same. Of the trained rescuers, 60% pressed with more than 125 lbs, whereas only 37% of the laypersons pressed with more than 125 lbs. In view of the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines (2000) to depress the chest 1.5 to 2 inches, which requires 100–125 lbs, it would appear that most laypersons do not exert enough force for effective CPR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AHA Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2000;102 Suppl I:I22–59

  • Abella BS, Sandbo N, Vallsalitos PV, et al. Chest compression rates during CPR. Circulation 2005;111:428–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Heart Association (AHA). Supplement to Circulation 2005;112 Suppl 114

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankman IN, Gruben KG, Holperin HR, et al. Identifications of dynamic mechanical parameters of the human chest during CPR. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1990;17(2):211–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black C, Busutil A, Robertson C. Chest-wall injuries following CPR. Resuscitation 2004;62:339–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang W-C, Chen W-J, Chen S-Y, et al. Better adherence to the guidelines during CPR through the provision of audio prompts. Resuscitation 2005;64(3):297–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geddes LA, Roeder RA, Foster KS, et al. Cyclops Whistler - a noninvasive monitor for the amplitude of the arterial pulse. Cardiovasc Eng 2005;5(2):97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handley AJ, Handley SAJ. Improving CPR performance using an audible feedback system suitable for incorporation into an AED. Resuscitation 2003;57:57–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoke RS, Chamberlain D. Skeletal chest injuries secondary to CPR. Resuscitation 2004;63:322–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederer W, Mair D, Rabl W, etal. Frequency of rib, sternal fracture associated with out-of-hospital CPR. Resuscitation 2004;60:157–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Milander M, Hiscock PS, Sanders AB, et al. Chest compression and ventilation rates during CPR. Acad Emer Med 1995;2:708–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsitlika JE, Weisfeldt ML, Chandra N, et al. Elastic properties of the human chest during CPR. Crit Care Med 1983;11(9):685–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wik L, Johansen JK, Myklebust H, et al. Quality of CPR during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005;293(9):299–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank Kevin Ply, deputy chief of the Purdue University fire department and the others from environmental fire departments for participating in this study. All participants including the college students and staff were volunteers.

Supported by the Purdue University TRASK Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leslie A. Geddes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geddes, L.A., Boland, M.K., Taleyarkhan, P.R. et al. Chest Compression Force of Trained and Untrained CPR Rescuers. Cardiovasc Eng 7, 47–50 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10558-007-9029-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10558-007-9029-5

Keywords

Navigation