Skip to main content
Log in

High-definition intravascular ultrasound versus optical frequency domain imaging for the detection of calcium modification and fracture in heavily calcified coronary lesion

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) can delineate calcium modification and fracture, the capability of high-definition intravascular ultrasound (HD-IVUS) for detecting these remains unclear. This study evaluated diagnostic accuracy of HD-IVUS for assessing calcium modification and fracture as compared to OFDI. HD-IVUS and OFDI were used during orbital or rotational atherectomy procedures conducted for 21 heavily calcified coronary lesions in 19 patients. With OFDI assessment used as the gold standard, diagnostic accuracies of HD-IVUS for calcium modification and fracture were compared every 1 mm to the matched pre-stenting images (n = 1129). Calcium modification, as assessed by OFDI, was defined as polished and concave-shaped calcium. For HD-IVUS, calcium modification was defined as the presence of reverberation with concave-shaped calcium. In both assessments, the definition of calcium fracture was defined as a slit or complete break in the calcium plate. Calcified plaque was found in 86.4% of analyzed OFDI images. Calcium modification and fracture were detected in 20.6% and 11.0% of detected calcified plaques. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of HD-IVUS detection for calcium modification and fracture were 54.4%, 97.8%, 86.7%, 89.1% and 86.0%, 94.5%, 58.2%, 96.8%, respectively. Discordance cases between both assessments demonstrated that heterogeneous calcium visualized by OFDI, separated calcium, and guide wire artifact can be misdiagnosed. Diagnostic accuracies of HD-IVUS for assessing calcium modification and fracture were acceptable as compared to OFDI. Such findings can be of utility during imaging guided interventional procedures with atherectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huisman J, van der Heijden LC, Kok MM, Louwerenburg JH, Danse PW, Jessurun GA et al (2017) Two-year outcome after treatment of severely calcified lesions with newer-generation drug-eluting stents in acute coronary syndromes: a patient-level pooled analysis from TWENTE and DUTCH PEERS. J Cardiol 69:660–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guedeney P, Claessen BE, Mehran R, Mintz GS, Liu M, Sorrentino S et al (2020) Coronary calcification and long-term outcomes according to drug-eluting stent generation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 13:1417–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Satler LF, Kent KM, Pichard AD et al (1998) Treatment of calcified coronary lesions with Palmaz-Schatz stents. An intravascular ultrasound study. Eur Heart J 19:1224–1231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fujino A, Mintz GS, Matsumura M, Lee T, Kim SY, Hoshino M et al (2018) A new optical coherence tomography-based calcium scoring system to predict stent underexpansion. EuroIntervention 13:e2182–e2189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujino A, Mintz GS, Lee T, Hoshino M, Usui E, Kanaji Y et al (2018) Predictors of calcium fracture derived from balloon angioplasty and its effect on stent expansion assessed by optical coherence tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 11:1015–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Raber L, Mintz GS, Koskinas KC, Johnson TW, Holm NR, Onuma Y et al (2018) Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European association of percutaneous cardiovascular interventions. Eur Heart J 39:3281–3300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sakakura K, Ito Y, Shibata Y, Okamura A, Kashima Y, Nakamura S et al (2021) Clinical expert consensus document on rotational atherectomy from the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 36:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maehara A, Matsumura M, Ali ZA, Mintz GS, Stone GW (2017) IVUS-guided versus OCT-guided coronary stent implantation: a critical appraisal. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:1487–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chambers JW, Feldman RL, Himmelstein SI, Bhatheja R, Villa AE, Strickman NE et al (2014) Pivotal trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the orbital atherectomy system in treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions (ORBIT II). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7:510–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jang IK, Bouma BE, Kang DH, Park SJ, Park SW, Seung KB et al (2002) Visualization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques in patients using optical coherence tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:604–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mintz GS, Douek P, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Popma JJ et al (1992) Target lesion calcification in coronary artery disease: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol 20:1149–1155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee T, Mintz GS, Matsumura M, Zhang W, Cao Y, Usui E et al (2017) Prevalence, predictors, and clinical presentation of a calcified nodule as assessed by optical coherence tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:883–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee JB, Mintz GS, Lisauskas JB, Biro SG, Pu J, Sum ST et al (2011) Histopathologic validation of the intravascular ultrasound diagnosis of calcified coronary artery nodules. Am J Cardiol 108:1547–1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamamoto MH, Maehara A, Karimi Galougahi K, Mintz GS, Parviz Y, Kim SS et al (2017) Mechanisms of orbital versus rotational atherectomy plaque modification in severely calcified lesions assessed by optical coherence tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10:2584–2586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim SS, Yamamoto MH, Maehara A, Sidik N, Koyama K, Berry C et al (2018) Intravascular ultrasound assessment of the effects of rotational atherectomy in calcified coronary artery lesions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 34:1365–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ali ZA, Maehara A, Généreux P, Shlofmitz RA, Fabbiocchi F, Nazif TM et al (2016) Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 388:2618–2628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang X, Matsumura M, Mintz GS, Lee T, Zhang W, Cao Y et al (2017) In vivo calcium detection by comparing optical coherence tomography, intravascular ultrasound, and angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:869–879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pu J, Mintz GS, Biro S, Lee JB, Sum ST, Madden SP et al (2014) Insights into echo-attenuated plaques, echolucent plaques, and plaques with spotty calcification: novel findings from comparisons among intravascular ultrasound, near-infrared spectroscopy, and pathological histology in 2,294 human coronary artery segments. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:2220–2233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ijichi T, Nakazawa G, Torii S, Nakano M, Yoshikawa A, Morino Y et al (2015) Evaluation of coronary arterial calcification—ex-vivo assessment by optical frequency domain imaging. Atherosclerosis 243:242–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rieber J, Meissner O, Babaryka G, Reim S, Oswald M, Koenig A et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound for the detection and characterization of atherosclerotic plaque composition in ex-vivo coronary specimens: a comparison with histology. Coron Artery Dis 17:425–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kobayashi N, Ito Y, Yamawaki M, Araki M, Obokata M, Sakamoto Y et al (2020) Optical coherence tomography-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided rotational atherectomy in patients with calcified coronary lesions. EuroIntervention 16:e313–e321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shlofmitz E, Jeremias A, Shlofmitz R, Ali ZA (2019) Lesion preparation with orbital atherectomy. Interv Cardiol 14:169–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hill JM, Kereiakes DJ, Shlofmitz RA, Klein AJ, Riley RF, Price MJ et al (2020) Intravascular lithotripsy for treatment of severely calcified coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 76:2635–2646

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hong SJ, Kim BK, Shin DH, Nam CM, Kim JS, Ko YG et al (2015) Effect of intravascular ultrasound-guided vs angiography-guided everolimus-eluting stent implantation: the IVUS-XPL randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:2155–2163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang J, Gao X, Kan J, Ge Z, Han L, Lu S et al (2018) Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: the ultimate trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 72:3126–3137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Elbadawi A, Elzeneini M, Elgendy IY, Mahmoud K, Omer MA, Ogunbayo GO et al (2020) Temporal trends and outcomes of percutaneous coronary atherectomy in the United States. J Invasive Cardiol 32:E110-e121

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Amemiya K, Yamamoto MH, Maehara A, Oyama Y, Igawa W, Ono M et al (2019) Effect of cutting balloon after rotational atherectomy in severely calcified coronary artery lesions as assessed by optical coherence tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 94:936–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Matsukawa R, Kozai T, Tokutome M, Nakashima R, Nishimura R, Matsumoto S et al (2019) Plaque modification using a cutting balloon is more effective for stenting of heavily calcified lesion than other scoring balloons. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 34:325–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ono M, Kawashima H, Hara H, Gao C, Wang R, Kogame N et al (2020) Advances in IVUS/OCT and future clinical perspective of novel hybrid catheter system in coronary imaging. Front Cardiovasc Med 7:119

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by KAKENHI Grant Number 20K08142 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). The authors are deeply grateful to Tatsuya Shinke (image technician) for assisting in the performance of the image matching.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaru Ishida.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Ishida receives lecture honoraria from Abbott Vascular Japan, Boston Scientific Japan, Daiichi Sankyo, Japan Lifeline, Kowa, Medikit and Terumo Corporation. Dr. Itoh receives lecture honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo, and Abbott Vascular. Dr. Morino received lecture honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Sanofi, and Daiichi-Sankyo. None of the other authors have any conflicts of interest or financial disclosures.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ishida, M., Oshikiri, Y., Kimura, T. et al. High-definition intravascular ultrasound versus optical frequency domain imaging for the detection of calcium modification and fracture in heavily calcified coronary lesion. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 38, 1203–1212 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02521-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02521-8

Keywords

Navigation