Skip to main content
Log in

Blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after TAVI compared to surgical aortic valve replacement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ascending aortic blood flow characteristics are altered after aortic valve surgery, but the effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is unknown. Abnormal flow may be associated with aortic and cardiac remodeling. We analyzed blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after TAVI in comparison to conventional stented aortic bioprostheses (AVR) and healthy subjects using time-resolved three-dimensional flow-sensitive cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (4D-flow MRI). Seventeen patients with TAVI (Edwards Sapien XT), 12 with AVR and 9 healthy controls underwent 4D-flow MRI of the ascending aorta. Target parameters were: severity of vortical and helical flow pattern (semiquantitative grading from 0 = none to 3 = severe) and the local distribution of systolic wall shear stress (WSSsystole). AVR revealed significantly more extensive vortical and helical flow pattern than TAVI (p = 0.042 and p = 0.002) and controls (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001). TAVI showed significantly more extensive vortical flow than controls (p < 0.001). Both TAVI and AVR revealed marked blood flow eccentricity (64.7 and 66.7 %, respectively), whereas controls showed central blood flow (88.9 %). TAVI and AVR exhibited an asymmetric distribution of WSSsystole in the mid-ascending aorta with local maxima at the right anterior aortic wall and local minima at the left posterior wall. In contrast, controls showed a symmetric distribution of WSSsystole along the aortic circumference. Blood flow was significantly altered in the ascending aorta after TAVI and AVR. Changes were similar regarding WSSsystole distribution, while TAVI resulted in less helical and vortical blood flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cribier A (2002) Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation 106:3006–3008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. New Engl J Med 363:1597–1607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ et al (2011) Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. New Engl J Med 364:2187–2198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barker AJ, Markl M, Burk J, Lorenz R, Bock J, Bauer S, Schulz-Menger J, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F (2012) Bicuspid aortic valve is associated with altered wall shear stress in the ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5:457–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Trauzeddel RF, Barker AJ, Gruettner H, Markl M, Schulz-Menger J (2014) Blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement-a pilot study using 4D-flow MRI. Int J Cardiol 170:426–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hope MD, Wrenn J, Sigovan M, Foster E, Tseng EE, Saloner D (2012) Imaging biomarkers of aortic disease: increased growth rates with eccentric systolic flow. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:356–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barker AJ, van Ooij P, Bandi K, Garcia J, Albaghdadi M, McCarthy P, Bonow RO, Carr J, Collins J, Malaisrie SC, Markl M (2014) Viscous energy loss in the presence of abnormal aortic flow. Magn Reson Med 72:620–628

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Markl M, Frydrychowicz A, Kozerke S, Hope M, Wieben O (2012) 4D flow MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 36:1015–1036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schnell S, Markl M, Entezari P, Mahadewia RJ, Semaan E, Stankovic Z, Collins J, Carr J, Jung B (2014) k-t GRAPPA accelerated four-dimensional flow MRI in the aorta: effect on scan time, image quality, and quantification of flow and wall shear stress. Magn Reson Med 72:522–533

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schulz-Menger JB, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J, Flamm SD, Fogel MA, Friedrich MG, Kim RJ, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Kramer CM, Pennell DJ, Plein S, Nagel E (2013) Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Spethmann S, Dreger H, Schattke S, Baldenhofer G, Saghabalyan D, Stangl V, Laule M, Baumann G, Stangl K, Knebel F (2012) Doppler haemodynamics and effective orifice areas of Edwards SAPIEN and CoreValve transcatheter aortic valves. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 13:690–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Binder RK, Webb JG, Toggweiler S, Freeman M, Barbanti M, Willson AB, Alhassan D, Hague CJ, Wood DA, Leipsic J (2013) Impact of post-implant SAPIEN XT geometry and position on conduction disturbances, hemodynamic performance, and paravalvular regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6:462–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff FRA, Wassmuth R, Abdel-Aty H, Schulz-Menger J (2010) Aortic dilatation in patients with prosthetic aortic valve: comparison of MRI and echocardiography. J Heart Valve Dis 19:349–356

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stalder AF, Russe MF, Frydrychowicz A, Bock J, Hennig J, Markl M (2008) Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med 60:1218–1231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hope MD, Hope TA, Crook SE, Ordovas KG, Urbania TH, Alley MT, Higgins CB (2011) 4D flow CMR in assessment of valve-related ascending aortic disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:781–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Clavel MA, Webb JG, Rodes-Cabau J, Masson JB, Dumont E, De Larochelliere R, Doyle D, Bergeron S, Baumgartner H, Burwash IG, Dumesnil JG, Mundigler G, Moss R, Kempny A, Bagur R, Bergler-Klein J, Gurvitch R, Mathieu P, Pibarot P (2010) Comparison between transcatheter and surgical prosthetic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Circulation 122:1928–1936

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fairbairn TA, Steadman CD, Mather AN, Motwani M, Blackman DJ, Plein S, McCann GP, Greenwood JP (2013) Assessment of valve haemodynamics, reverse ventricular remodelling and myocardial fibrosis following transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to surgical aortic valve replacement: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. Heart 99:1185–1191

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dyverfeldt P, Hope MD, Tseng EE, Saloner D (2013) Magnetic resonance measurement of turbulent kinetic energy for the estimation of irreversible pressure loss in aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:64–71

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mahadevia R, Barker AJ, Schnell S, Entezari P, Kansal P, Fedak PW, Malaisrie SC, McCarthy P, Collins J, Carr J, Markl M (2013) Bicuspid aortic cusp fusion morphology alters aortic 3D outflow patterns, wall shear stress and expression of aortopathy. Circulation 129:673–682

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cecchi E, Giglioli C, Valente S, Lazzeri C, Gensini GF, Abbate R, Mannini L (2011) Role of hemodynamic shear stress in cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis 214:249–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rinaudo A, Pasta S (2014) Regional variation of wall shear stress in ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 228:627–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bogren HG, Mohiaddin RH, Kilner PJ, Jimenez-Borreguero LJ, Yang GZ, Firmin DN (1997) Blood flow patterns in the thoracic aorta studied with three-directional MR velocity mapping: the effects of age and coronary artery disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:784–793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hope TA, Markl M, Wigstrom L, Alley MT, Miller DC, Herfkens RJ (2007) Comparison of flow patterns in ascending aortic aneurysms and volunteers using four-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:1471–1479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Della Corte A, Bancone C, Conti CA, Votta E, Redaelli A, Del Viscovo L, Cotrufo M (2012) Restricted cusp motion in right-left type of bicuspid aortic valves: a new risk marker for aortopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:360–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Markl M, Wallis W, Harloff A (2011) Reproducibility of flow and wall shear stress analysis using flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI. J Magn Res Imaging 33:988–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lorenz R, Bock J, Barker AJ, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Wallis W, Korvink JG, Bissell MM, Schulz-Menger J, Markl M (2013) 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging in bicuspid aortic valve disease demonstrates altered distribution of aortic blood flow helicity. Magn Reson Med 71:1542–1553

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank our technicians Kerstin Kretschel, Evelyn Polzin and Denise Kleindiest for performing the CMR scans. We also thank our study nurses Elke Nickel-Szczech and Annette Koehler as well as the other working group members for their assistance in realizing the study. This study was partly funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH K25HL119608, R01HL115828).

Funding

This study was partly funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH K25HL119608, R01HL115828).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trauzeddel, R.F., Löbe, U., Barker, A.J. et al. Blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after TAVI compared to surgical aortic valve replacement. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 32, 461–467 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0792-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0792-x

Keywords

Navigation