Skip to main content
Log in

MR imaging findings in 76 consecutive surgically proven cases of pericardial disease with CT and pathologic correlation

  • Original paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To describe findings of patients with surgically confirmed pericardial disease on state of the art MR sequences. Retrospective review was performed for patients who underwent pericardiectomy and preoperative MR over a 5 year period ending in 2009. Patients’ records were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis of chronic recurrent pericarditis, constrictive pericarditis, or pericardial tumor. MR imaging findings of pericardial thickness, IVC diameter, presence or absence of pericardial or pleural effusion, pericardial edema, pericardial enhancement, and septal “bounce” were recorded. Patients with constriction had a larger IVC diameter (3.1 ± 0.4 cm) than patients with recurrent pain and no constriction (2.0 ± 0.4 cm). Mean pericardial thickness for the 16 patients with chronic recurrent pericarditis but no evidence of constriction was 4.8 ± 2.9 mm. Mean pericardial thickness for patients with constriction was 9.2 ± 7.0 cm with calcification, and 4.6 ± 2.1 cm without calcification. 94% of patients with chronic recurrent pericarditis had gadolinium enhancement of the pericardium, while 76% of patients with constriction had pericardial enhancement. Septal “bounce” was present in 19% of chronic recurrent pericarditis cases and 86% of constriction cases. 5 patients had a pericardial neoplasm, 1 of which was not identified preoperatively. State of the art MR techniques can identify significant and distinct findings in patients with chronic recurrent pericarditis, constrictive pericarditis, and pericardial tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stark DD, Higgins CB, Lanzer P et al (1984) Magnetic resonance imaging of the pericardium: normal and pathologic findings. Radiology 150:469–474

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor AM, Dymarkowski S, Verbeken EK (2006) Detection of pericardial inflammation with late-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial results. Eur Radiol 16:569–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sechtem U, Tscholakoff D, Higgins CB (1986) MRI of the normal pericardium. AJR 147:239–244

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sechtem U, Tscholakoff D, Higgins CB (1986) MRI of the abnormal pericardium. AJR 147:245–252

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor AM, Dymarkowski S, Verbeken EK, Bogaert J (2006) Detection of pericardial inflammation with late-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial results. Eur Radiol 16:569–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Masui T, Finck S, Higgins CB (1992) Constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 182:369–373

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Klein C, Graf K, Fleck E, Nagel E (2003) Acute fibrinous pericarditis assessed with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 107:e82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Watanabe A, Hara Y, Hamada M et al (1998) A case of effusive-constrictive pericarditis: an efficacy of Gd-DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to detect a pericardial thickening. Magn Resonan Imaging 16:347–350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsuoka H, Hamada M, Honda T et al (1994) Evaluation of acute myocarditis and pericarditis by Gd-DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 15:283–284

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sa MI, Kiesewetter CH, Jagathesan R, Prasad SK (2009) Acute pericarditis assessed with magnetic resonance imaging: a new approach. Circulation 119:3183–3186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Giorgi B, Mollet NRA, Dymarkoswki S, Rademakers FA, Bogaert J (2003) Assessment of ventricular septal motion in patients clinically suspected of constrictive pericarditis, using magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 228:417–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oh KY, Shimizu M, Edwards WD, Tazelaar HD, Danielson GK (2001) Surgical pathology of the parietal pericardium: a study of 344 cases (1993–1999). Cardiovasc Pathol 10(4):157–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Talreja DR, Edwards WD, Danielson GK, Schaff HV, Tajik AJ, Tazelaar HD, Breen JF, Oh JK (2003) Constrictive pericarditis in 26 patients with histologically normal pericardial thickness. Circulation 108(15):1852–1857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mueller C, Globits S, Glogar D, Klepetko W, Knoflach P (1991) Constrictive pericarditis without significant hemodynamic changes as a cause of oedema formation due to protein-losing enteropathy. Eur Heart J 12:1140–1143

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nishimura RA (2001) Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: a diagnostic dilemma. Heart 86:619–623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phillip M. Young.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, P.M., Glockner, J.F., Williamson, E.E. et al. MR imaging findings in 76 consecutive surgically proven cases of pericardial disease with CT and pathologic correlation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28, 1099–1109 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9916-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9916-0

Keywords

Navigation