Skip to main content
Log in

Reproducibility in the assessment of noncalcified coronary plaque with 256-slice multi-detector CT and automated plaque analysis software

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We aimed to assess intra- and inter-observer reproducibility in evaluating volume and characteristics of non-calcified coronary plaques (NCPs) using a 256-slice multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) angiography and dedicated automated plaque analysis software in asymptomatic individuals. Forty-two NCPs from 39 patients with a vessel diameter >2 mm were evaluated using a 256-slice MDCT with dedicated automated plaque analysis software. Two independent observers analyzed the characteristics of NCPs, including plaque volume (vol), mean CT number of the NCPs in Hounsfield units (HUmean), and remodeling index (RI). One of the observers repeated the evaluation of all datasets after an interval of at least 4 weeks. Bland–Altman analysis and concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) were used to determine intra- and inter-observer variability. For vol measurements, the 95% limits of agreement were −21.6 and 13.2 mm3, and −24.6 and 20.3 mm3 for intra- and inter-observer variability, respectively. For HUmean measurements, the 95% limits of agreement were −22.2 and 20.8 HU, and −21.1 and 21.0 HU for intra- and inter-observer variability, respectively. For RI measurements, the 95% limits of agreement were −0.38 and 0.39, and −0.51 and 0.36 for intra- and inter-observer variability, respectively. The CCCs was very high for all measurements, ranging from 0.90 to 0.98. Using 256-slice MDCT with dedicated automated plaque analysis software, intra- and inter-observer reproducibility were excellent in evaluating the volume and characteristics of NCP in asymptomatic individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choi EK, Choi SI, Rivera JJ et al (2008) Coronary computed tomography angiography as a screening tool for the detection of occult coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(5):357–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A et al (2001) The thin-cap fibroatheroma: a type of vulnerable plaque: the major precursor lesion to acute coronary syndromes. Curr Opin Cardiol 16(5):285–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H et al (2009) Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 54(1):49–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruining N, Roelandt JR, Palumbo A et al (2007) Reproducibility coronary plaque quantification by multislice computed tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69(6):857–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A et al (2006) Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(3):672–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun J, Zhang Z, Lu B et al (2008) Identification and quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparison of 64-MDCT and intravascular ultrasound. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(3):748–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the ad hoc committee for grading of coronary artery disease, council on cardiovascular surgery, American heart association. Circulation 51(4 Suppl):5–40

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chun EJ, Lee W, Choi YH et al (2008) Effects of nitroglycerin on the diagnostic accuracy of electrocardiogram-gated coronary computed tomography angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32(1):86–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Klass O, Kleinhans S, Walker MJ et al (2010) Coronary plaque imaging with 256-slice multidetector computed tomography: interobserver variability of volumetric lesion parameters with semiautomatic plaque analysis software. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26(6):711–720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmid M, Pflederer T, Jang IK et al (2008) Relationship between degree of remodeling and CT attenuation of plaque in coronary atherosclerotic lesions: an in vivo analysis by multi-detector computed tomography. Atherosclerosis 197(1):457–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schoenhagen P, Nissen SE (2004) An atlas and manual of coronary intravascular ultrasound imaging. Panthenon Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 346(8982):1085–1087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin LI (1989) A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45(1):255–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Clouse ME, Sabir A, Yam CS et al (2008) Measuring noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque using voxel analysis with MDCT angiography: a pilot clinical study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(6):1553–1560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoffmann H, Frieler K, Hamm B et al (2008) Intra- and interobserver variability in detection and assessment of calcified and noncalcified coronary artery plaques using 64-slice computed tomography: variability in coronary plaque measurement using MSCT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24(7):735–742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bastarrika G, Lee YS, Huda W et al (2009) CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology 253(2):317–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Blackmon KN, Streck J, Thilo C et al (2009) Reproducibility of automated noncalcified coronary artery plaque burden assessment at coronary CT angiography. J Thorac Imaging 24(2):96–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (No. 2010-0023504).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eun Ju Chun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, M.S., Chun, E.J., Kim, K.J. et al. Reproducibility in the assessment of noncalcified coronary plaque with 256-slice multi-detector CT and automated plaque analysis software. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26 (Suppl 2), 237–244 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9710-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9710-4

Keywords

Navigation