Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Magnetic resonance imaging is the diagnostic tool of choice in the preoperative evaluation of patients with partial anomalous pulmonary venous return

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Diagnosis of partial anomalous pulmonary venous return is usually suspected by echocardiography and often confirmed by cardiac catheterization. Magnetic resonance imaging is a powerful non-invasive diagnostic tool that can give accurate insight on systemic and pulmonary veins, cardiac anatomy and physiopathology.

Aim

To test the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance in patient with suspected partial anomalous pulmonary venous return.

Case presentation

Twenty consecutive patients (10 male, mean age: 27±20 years) with suspected partial anomalous pulmonary venous return underwent a magnetic resonance study comprehensive of Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography and phase-velocity-contrast in order to evaluate pulmonary and systemic venous anatomy and QP/QS. In 14 of them a cardiac catheterization was also performed. Anatomy findings and QP/QS result of both exams were compared. Sixteen patients underwent surgical correction. In the other four patients with QP/QS<1.5, surgical correction was not indicated according to the literature (1).

Among patient which performed both magnetic resonance and cardiac catheterization (14 patients) anatomy findings were concordant in 12 of them. In all operated patients, surgical findings were concordant with MRI report. There was a good correlation between magnetic resonance and cardiac catheterization QP/QS evaluation (mean value 2.23 and 2.4, respectively).

Conclusion

In patients with suspected anomalous pulmonary venous return, magnetic resonance provides a comprehensive evaluation of pulmonary venous return and the amount of shunt, overcoming most of the limitations of echocardiography. Therefore magnetic resonance is a powerful diagnostic tool for indicating therapeutic management and surgical strategies for this group of patients, and can be considered a non-invasive alternative to cardiac catheterization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kirklin JW, Barratt-Boyes BG (1993). Atrial septal defect and partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection. In: Kirklin JW, Barratt-Boyes BG, (eds) Cardiac Surgery, 2nd edition. New York, Churchill Linvingstone Inc, pp. 638–640

    Google Scholar 

  2. Laks H, Marrelli D, Drinkwater DJ editors. Surgery for adults with congenital heart disease. In: Cardiac Surgery in the Adult. Edited by Edmunds LH, Jr. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997; 1366

  3. Ferrari VA, Scott CH, Holland GA, Axel L, St Jhon Sutton M (2001). Ultrafast three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and imaging in the diagnosis of partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage. J Am Coll Cardiol 37(4):1120–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wong ML, McCrindle BW, Mota C, Smallhorn JF (1995). Echocardiographic evaluation of partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage. J Am Coll Cardiol 26(2):503–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Satomi G, Takao A, Momma K, et al. (1986). Detection of the drainage site in anomalous pulmonary venous connection by two-dimensional Doppler color flow-mapping echocardiography. Heart Vessels 2(1):41–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hijii T, Fukushige J, Hara T (1998). Diagnosis and management of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection. A review of 28 pediatric cases. Cardiology 89(2):148–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Geva T, Sahn DJ, Powell AJ. (2003). Magnetic resonance imaging of congenital heart disease in adults. Prog Pediatr Cardiol 17(1):21–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kastler B, Livolsi A, Germain P, et al. (2004). Value of MRI in the evaluation of congenital anomalies of the heart and great vessels. J Radiol 85(10 Pt 2):1821–1850

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rebergen SA, de Roos A (2000). Congenital Heart Disease. Evaluation of Anatomy and Function by MRI. Herz 25(4):365–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Greil GF, Powell AJ, Gildein HP, Geva T (2002). Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of pulmonary and systemic venous anomalies. J Am Coll Cardiol 39(2):335–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Masui T, Seelos K, Kersting-Sommerhoff B, Higgins C (1991). Abnormalities of the pulmonary veins—evaluation with MR imaging and comparison with cardiac angiography and echocardiography. Radiology 181(1):645–649

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. White C, Baffa J, Haney P, Campbell A, NessAiver M (1998). Anomalies of pulmonary veins: usefulness of spin-echo and gradient-echo MR images. Am J Roentgenol 170(5): 1365–1368

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen M, Hartnell G, Finn J (1994). Magnetic resonance angiography of congenital pulmonary vein anomalies. Am Heart J 127 (4 Pt 1):954–955

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Beerbaum P, Korperich H, Barth P, Esdorn H, Gieseke J, Meyer H (2001). Noninvasive quantification of left-to-right shunt in pediatric patients: phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging compared with invasive oximetry. Circulation 103(20):2476–2482

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Powell AJ, Tsai-Goodman B, Prakash A, Greil GF, Geva T (2003). Comparison between phase-velocity cine magnetic resonance imaging and invasive oximetry for quantification of atrial shunts. Am J Cardiol 91(12):1523–1525, A9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Powell AJ, Maier SE, Chung T, Geva T (2000). Phase-velocity cine magnetic resonance imaging measurement of pulsatile blood flow in children and young adults: in vitro and in vivo validation. Pediatr Cardiol 21(2):104–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mostbeck GH, Caputo GR, Higgins CB (1992). MR measurement of blood flow in the cardiovascular system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159(3):453–461

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brenner LD, Caputo GR, Mostbeck G, et al. (1992). Quantification of left to right atrial shunts with velocity-encoded cine nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 20(5):1246–1250

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Beygui F, Furber A, Delepine S, et al. (2004). Routine breath-hold gradient echo MRI-derived right ventricular mass, volumes and function: accuracy, reproducibility and coherence study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 20(6):509–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jauhiainen T, Jarvinen VM, Hekali PE (2002). Evaluation of methods for MR imaging of human right ventricular heart volumes and mass. Acta Radiol 43(6):587–592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Alfakih K, Thiele H, Plein S, Bainbridge GJ, Ridgway JP, Sivananthan MU (2002). Comparison of right ventricular volume measurement between segmented k-space gradient-echo and steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 16(3):253–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Grossman W (1991). Shunt detection and measurement. In: Grossman W, Baim DS, (eds) Cardiac Catheterization, Angiography, and Intervention 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA, Lea & Febiger, pp. 166–181

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dittmann H, Jacksch R, Voelker W, Karsch KR, Seipel L (1988). Accuracy of Doppler echocardiography in quantification of left to right shunts in adult patients with atrial septal defect. J Am Coll Cardiol 11(2):338–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kitabatake A, Inoue M, Asao M, et al. (1984). Noninvasive evaluation of the ratio of pulmonary to systemic flow in atrial septal defect by duplex Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 69(1):73–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ueda T, Uesaka K, Sono K, et al. (1981). Echocardiographic assessment of Qp/Qs in children with atrial septal defect or partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection. Jpn Circ J 45(6):639–645

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Okamoto M, Miyatake K, Kinoshita N, et al. (1984). Noninvasive determination of the ratio of pulmonary to systemic blood flow with two-dimensional Doppler echocardiography: efficacy and limitation. J Cardiogr 14(1):189–200

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Evangelista A, Aguade S, Candell-Riera J, et al. (1998). Quantification of left-to-right shunt in atrial septal defect using oximetry, isotopes, and Doppler echocardiography. Is there a method of reference?. Rev Esp Cardiol 51 Suppl 1:2–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Antman EM, Marsh JD, Green LH, Grossman W (1980). Blood oxygen measurements in the assessment of intracardiac left to right shunts: a critical appraisal of methodology. Am J Cardiol 46(2):265–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Freed MD, Miettinen OS, Nadas AS (1979). Oximetric detection of intracardiac left-to-right shunts. Br Heart J 42(6):690–694

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Baratt-Boyes BG, Woof EH (1957). The oxygen saturation of blood in the venea cavae, right-heart chambers, and pulmonary vessels of healthy subjects. J Lab Clin med 50(1):93–106

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hillis LD, Firth BG, Winniford MD (1986). Variability of right-sided cardiac oxygen saturationsin adults with and without left-to-right intracardiac shunting. Am J Cardiol 58(1):129–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Festa P (2004). Congenital heart disease. In: Lombardi M. et al (eds) MRI of the Heart and Vessels. Springer-Verlag Italia, Milan, Chapter 7.7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pediatric Cardiology,, Ospedale ``G.Pasquinucci'', Massa CNR, Via Aurelia Sud, Massa, Italy

    Pierluigi Festa, Lamia Ait-Ali, Alfredo Giuseppe Cerillo, Daniele De Marchi & Bruno Murzi

Authors
  1. Pierluigi Festa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lamia Ait-Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alfredo Giuseppe Cerillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniele De Marchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bruno Murzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierluigi Festa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Festa, P., Ait-Ali, L., Cerillo, A. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging is the diagnostic tool of choice in the preoperative evaluation of patients with partial anomalous pulmonary venous return. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 22, 685–693 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-005-9070-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-005-9070-7

Key words

Search

Navigation