Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cigarette smoking and mammographic density in the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Smoking before first childbirth increases breast cancer risk, but the biological mechanism remains unknown and may involve mammographic density (MD), one of the strongest biomarkers of breast cancer risk. We aimed to examine whether active smoking and passive smoking were associated with MD.

Methods

For the 5,356 women (4,489 postmenopausal) from the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort (1993–1997) who attended mammographic screening in Copenhagen (1993–2001), we used MD (mixed/dense or fatty) assessed at the first screening after cohort entry. Active smoking (status, duration, and intensity) and passive smoking were assessed at cohort baseline (1993–1997) via questionnaire, together with other breast cancer risk factors. Logistic regression was used to estimate associations (odds ratios, 95 % confidence intervals) between smoking and MD, adjusting for confounders.

Results

Two thousand and twenty-six (56.5 %) women had mixed/dense MD, 2,214 (41.4 %) were current, and 1,175 (21.9 %) former smokers. Current smokers had significantly lower odds (0.86, 0.75–0.99) of having mixed/dense MD compared to never smokers, while former smoking was not associated with MD. Inverse association between smoking and MD was strongest in women who initiated smoking before age of 16 years (0.79, 0.64–0.96), smoked ≥15 cigarettes/day (0.83, 0.71–0.98), smoked ≥5 pack-years (0.62, 0.43–0.89), smoked >30 years (0.86, 0.75–0.99), and smoked ≥11 years before first childbirth (0.70, 0.51–0.96). Association between smoking and MD diminished after smoking cessation, with increased odds of having mixed/dense breasts in women who quit smoking >20 years ago as compared to current smokers (1.37, 1.01–1.67). There was no association between passive smoking and MD.

Conclusions

We found an inverse association between active smoking and MD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Bronskill M, Yaffe MJ, Duric N, Minkin S (2010) Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:1224–1237

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Yaffe MJ, Minkin S (2011) Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects. Breast Cancer Res 13:223

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bjerkaas E, Parajuli R, Weiderpass E, Engeland A, Maskarinec G, Selmer R et al (2013) Smoking duration before first childbirth: an emerging risk factor for breast cancer? Results from 302,865 Norwegian women. Cancer Causes Control 24:1347–1356

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Dossus L, Boutron-Ruault MC, Kaaks R, Gram IT, Vilier A, Fervers B et al (2014) Active and passive cigarette smoking and breast cancer risk: results from the EPIC cohort. Int J Cancer 134:1871–1888

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaudet MM, Gapstur SM, Sun J, Diver WR, Hannan LM, Thun MJ (2013) Active smoking and breast cancer risk: original cohort data and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 105:515–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Luo J, Margolis KL, Wactawski-Wende J, Horn K, Messina C, Stefanick ML et al (2011) Association of active and passive smoking with risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women: a prospective cohort study. BMJ 342:d1016

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bremnes Y, Ursin G, Bjurstam N, Gram IT (2007) Different measures of smoking exposure and mammographic density in postmenopausal Norwegian women: a cross-sectional study. Breast Cancer Res 9:R73

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Butler LM, Gold EB, Conroy SM, Crandall CJ, Greendale GA, Oestreicher N et al (2010) Active, but not passive cigarette smoking was inversely associated with mammographic density. Cancer Causes Control 21:301–311

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cabanes A, Pastor-Barriuso R, Garcia-Lopez M, Pedraz-Pingarron C, Sanchez-Contador C, Vazquez Carrete JA et al (2011) Alcohol, tobacco, and mammographic density: a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 129:135–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeffreys M, Warren R, Gunnell D, McCarron P, Smith GD (2004) Life course breast cancer risk factors and adult breast density (United Kingdom). Cancer Causes Control 15:947–955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Modugno F, Ngo DL, Allen GO, Kuller LH, Ness RB, Vogel VG et al (2006) Breast cancer risk factors and mammographic breast density in women over age 70. Breast Cancer Res Treat 97:157–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gapstur SM, Lopez P, Colangelo LA, Wolfman J, Van HL, Hendrick RE (2003) Associations of breast cancer risk factors with breast density in Hispanic women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 12:1074–1080

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brand JS, Czene K, Eriksson L, Trinh T, Bhoo-Pathy N, Hall P et al (2013) Influence of lifestyle factors on mammographic density in postmenopausal women. PLoS One 8:e81876

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ishihara S, Taira N, Kawasaki K, Ishibe Y, Mizoo T, Nishiyama K et al (2013) Association between mammographic breast density and lifestyle in Japanese women. Acta Med Okayama 67:145–151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roubidoux MA, Kaur JS, Griffith KA, Stillwater B, Novotny P, Sloan J (2003) Relationship of mammographic parenchymal patterns to breast cancer risk factors and smoking in Alaska Native women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 12:1081–1086

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vachon CM, Kuni CC, Anderson K, Anderson VE, Sellers TA (2000) Association of mammographically defined percent breast density with epidemiologic risk factors for breast cancer (United States). Cancer Causes Control 11:653–662

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tjonneland A, Olsen A, Boll K, Stripp C, Christensen J, Engholm G et al (2007) Study design, exposure variables, and socioeconomic determinants of participation in Diet, Cancer and Health: a population-based prospective cohort study of 57,053 men and women in Denmark. Scand J Public Health 35:432–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vejborg I, Olsen AH, Jensen MB, Rank F, Tange UB, Lynge E (2002) Early outcome of mammography screening in Copenhagen 1991–1999. J Med Screen 9:115–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Olsen AH, Bihrmann K, Jensen MB, Vejborg I, Lynge E (2009) Breast density and outcome of mammography screening: a cohort study. Br J Cancer 100:1205–1208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sickles EA, D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW (2013) ACR BI-RADS® mammography. In: ACR BI-RADS® atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology, Reston

  21. Hodge R, Hellmann SS, von Euler-Chelpin M, Vejborg I, Andersen ZJ (2014) Comparison of Danish dichotomous and BI-RADS classifications of mammographic density. Acta Radiol Short Rep 3:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pedersen CB (2011) The Danish civil registration system. Scand J Public Health 39:22–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Sun L, Guo H, Chiarelli A, Hislop G et al (2006) Body size, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15:2086–2092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hunter DJ, Willett WC (1993) Diet, body size, and breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev 15:110–132

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ursin G, Longnecker MP, Haile RW, Greenland S (1995) A meta-analysis of body mass index and risk of premenopausal breast cancer. Epidemiology 6:137–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ (1998) Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 7:1133–1144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Brisson J, Morrison AS, Kopans DB, Sadowsky NL, Kalisher L, Twaddle JA et al (1984) Height and weight, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 119:371–381

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sala E, Warren R, McCann J, Duffy S, Luben R, Day N (1999) High-risk mammographic parenchymal patterns and anthropometric measures: a case–control study. Br J Cancer 81:1257–1261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Russo J, Moral R, Balogh GA, Mailo D, Russo IH (2005) The protective role of pregnancy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 7:131–142

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Egan KM, Stampfer MJ, Hunter D, Hankinson S, Rosner BA, Holmes M et al (2002) Active and passive smoking in breast cancer: prospective results from the Nurses’ Health Study. Epidemiology 13:138–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ha M, Mabuchi K, Sigurdson AJ, Freedman DM, Linet MS, Doody MM et al (2007) Smoking cigarettes before first childbirth and risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 166:55–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lash TL, Aschengrau A (1999) Active and passive cigarette smoking and the occurrence of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 149:5–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Reynolds P, Hurley S, Goldberg DE, Anton-Culver H, Bernstein L, Deapen D et al (2004) Active smoking, household passive smoking, and breast cancer: evidence from the California Teachers Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:29–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Terry PD, Rohan TE (2002) Cigarette smoking and the risk of breast cancer in women: a review of the literature. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 11:953–971

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cavalieri E, Frenkel K, Liehr JG, Rogan E, Roy D (2000) Estrogens as endogenous genotoxic agents–DNA adducts and mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 27:75–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Russo J, Tay LK, Russo IH (1982) Differentiation of the mammary gland and susceptibility to carcinogenesis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2:5–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Vachon CM, Sellers TA, Vierkant RA, Wu FF, Brandt KR (2002) Case–control study of increased mammographic breast density response to hormone replacement therapy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 11(11):1382–1388

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wong CS, Lim GH, Gao F, Jakes RW, Offman J, Chia KS, Duffy SW (2011) Mammographic density and its interaction with other breast cancer risk factors in an Asian population. Br J Cancer 104(5):871–874

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Baron JA, La VC, Levi F (1990) The antiestrogenic effect of cigarette smoking in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:502–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Tanko LB, Christiansen C (2004) An update on the antiestrogenic effect of smoking: a literature review with implications for researchers and practitioners. Menopause 11:104–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Huynh S, von Euler-Chelpin M, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Hertel O, Tjønneland A, Lynge E, Vejborg I, Andersen ZJ (2015) Long-term exposure to air pollution and mammographic density in the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort. Environ Health 14:31

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Andersen ZJ, Baker JL, Bihrmann K, Vejborg I, Sørensen TI, Lynge E (2014) Birth weight, childhood body mass index, and height in relation to mammographic density and breast cancer: a register-based cohort study. Breast Cancer Res 16(1):R4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by Grant from Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF6935).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katja Kemp Jacobsen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jacobsen, K.K., Lynge, E., Vejborg, I. et al. Cigarette smoking and mammographic density in the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort. Cancer Causes Control 27, 271–280 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0704-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0704-3

Keywords

Navigation