Skip to main content
Log in

Circadian clock genes and risk of fatal prostate cancer

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Circadian genes may be involved in regulating cancer-related pathways, including cell proliferation, DNA damage response, and apoptosis. We aimed to assess the role of genetic variation in core circadian rhythm genes with the risk of fatal prostate cancer and first morning void urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin levels.

Methods

We used unconditional logistic regression to evaluate the association of 96 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across 12 circadian-related genes with fatal prostate cancer in the AGES-Reykjavik cohort (n = 24 cases), the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS) (n = 40 cases), and the Physicians’ Health Study (PHS) (n = 105 cases). We used linear regression to evaluate the association between SNPs and first morning void urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin levels in AGES-Reykjavik. We used a kernel machine test to evaluate whether multimarker SNP sets in the pathway (gene based) were associated with our outcomes.

Results

None of the individual SNPs were consistently associated with fatal prostate cancer across the three cohorts. In each cohort, gene-based analyses showed that variation in the CRY1 gene was nominally associated with fatal prostate cancer (p values = 0.01, 0.01, and 0.05 for AGES-Reykjavik, HPFS, and PHS, respectively). In AGES-Reykjavik, SNPs in TIMELESS (four SNPs), NPAS2 (six SNPs), PER3 (two SNPs) and CSNK1E (one SNP) were nominally associated with 6-sulfatoxymelatonin levels.

Conclusion

We did not find a strong and consistent association between variation in core circadian clock genes and fatal prostate cancer risk, but observed nominally significant gene-based associations with fatal prostate cancer and 6-sulfatoxymelatonin levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fu L, Lee CC (2003) The circadian clock: pacemaker and tumour suppressor. Nat Rev Cancer 3(5):350–361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhu Y et al (2009) Testing the circadian gene hypothesis in prostate cancer: a population-based case–control study. Cancer Res 69(24):9315–9322

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis S, Mirick DK (2006) Circadian disruption, shift work and the risk of cancer: a summary of the evidence and studies in Seattle. Cancer Causes Control 17:539–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blask DE (2009) Melatonin, sleep disturbance and cancer risk. Sleep Med Rev 13(4):257–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Costa G, Haus E, Stevens R (2010) Shift work and cancer—considerations on rationale, mechanisms, and epidemiology. Scand J Work Environ Health 36(2):163–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Buja A et al (2005) Cancer incidence among male military and civil pilots and flight attendants: an analysis on published data. Toxicol Ind Health 21(10):273–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Straif K et al (2007) Carcinogenicity of shift-work, painting, and fire-fighting. Lancet Oncol 8(12):1065–1066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parent ME et al (2012) Night work and the risk of cancer among men. Am J Epidemiol 176(9):751–759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sigurdardottir LG et al (2014) Urinary melatonin levels, sleep disruption, and risk of prostate cancer in elderly men. Eur Urol. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.008

  10. Sigurdardottir LG et al (2012) Circadian disruption, sleep loss, and prostate cancer risk: a systematic review of epidemiologic studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1002–1011

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sigurdardottir LG et al (2013) Sleep disruption among older men and risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 22(5):872–879

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kondratov RV, Gorbacheva VY, Antoch MP (2007) The role of mammalian circadian proteins in normal physiology and genotoxic stress responses. Curr Top Dev Biol 78:173–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Young MW, Kay SA (2001) Time zones: a comparative genetics of circadian clocks. Nat Rev Genet 2(9):702–715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Utge SJ et al (2010) Systematic analysis of circadian genes in a population-based sample reveals association of TIMELESS with depression and sleep disturbance. PLoS One 5(2):e9259

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Slominski RM et al (2012) Melatonin membrane receptors in peripheral tissues: distribution and functions. Mol Cell Endocrinol 351(2):152–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Antoch MP, Kondratov RV, Takahashi JS (2005) Circadian clock genes as modulators of sensitivity to genotoxic stress. Cell Cycle 4(7):901–907

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gauger MA, Sancar A (2005) Cryptochrome, circadian cycle, cell cycle checkpoints, and cancer. Cancer Res 65(15):6828–6834

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Borgs L et al (2009) Cell “circadian” cycle: new role for mammalian core clock genes. Cell Cycle 8(6):832–837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hua H et al (2006) Circadian gene mPer2 overexpression induces cancer cell apoptosis. Cancer Sci 97(7):589–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. DeBruyne JP, Weaver DR, Reppert SM (2007) CLOCK and NPAS2 have overlapping roles in the suprachiasmatic circadian clock. Nat Neurosci 10(5):543–545

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chu LW et al (2008) Variants in circadian genes and prostate cancer risk: a population-based study in China. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 11(4):342–348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin DW et al (2011) Genetic variants in the LEPR, CRY1, RNASEL, IL4, and ARVCF genes are prognostic markers of prostate cancer-specific mortality. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20(9):1928–1936

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Harris TB et al (2007) Age, gene/environment susceptibility-Reykjavik Study: multidisciplinary applied phenomics. Am J Epidemiol 165(9):1076–1087

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Giovannucci E et al (2003) Nutritional predictors of insulin-like growth factor I and their relationships to cancer in men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12(2):84–89

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schumacher FR et al (2011) Genome-wide association study identifies new prostate cancer susceptibility loci. Hum Mol Genet 20(19):3867–3875

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Iceland S (2011) (cited 2014). http://www.statice.is/

  27. Psaty BM et al (2009) Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium Design of Prospective Meta-Analyses of Genome-Wide Association Studies From 5 Cohorts. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2(1):73–80

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Murphy RA et al (2013) Candidate gene association study of BMI-related loci, weight, and adiposity in old age. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 68(6):661–666

  29. Nalls MA et al (2011) Multiple loci are associated with white blood cell phenotypes. PLoS Genet 7(6):e1002113. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002113

  30. Li Y et al (2009) Genotype imputation. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 10:387–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cochran WG (1954) The combination of estimates from different experiments Biometrics 10:101–129

  32. Evangelou E, Ioannidis JPA (2013) Meta-analysis methods for genome-wide association studies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet 14:379–389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu MC et al (2010) Powerful SNP-set analysis for case–control genome-wide association studies. Am J Hum Genet 86(6):929–942

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lin X et al (2011) Kernel machine SNP-set analysis for censored survival outcomes in genome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol 35(7):620–631

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kelly MA et al (2012) Circadian gene variants and susceptibility to type 2 diabetes: a pilot study. PLoS One 7(4):e32670. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032670

  36. Cao Q et al (2009) A role for the clock gene Per1 in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 69(19):7619–7625

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hoffman AE et al (2008) The circadian gene NPAS2, a putative tumor suppressor, is involved in DNA damage response. Mol Cancer Res 6:1461–1468

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhu Y et al (2006) Does “clock” matter in prostate cancer? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15(1):3–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Carpen JD et al (2005) A single-nucleotide polymorphism in the 5′-untranslated region of the hPER2 gene is associated with diurnal preference. J Sleep Res 14(3):293–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Evans DS et al (2013) Common genetic variants in ARNTL and NPAS2 and at chromosome 12p13 are associated with objectively measured sleep traits in the elderly. Sleep 36(3):431–446

  41. Duffy JF, Wright KP (2005) Entrainment of the human circadian system by light. J Biol Rhythms 20:326–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the study participants and the Icelandic Heart Association clinic staff for their invaluable contribution. We are grateful to the ongoing participation of men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (UM1 CA167552) and would like to acknowledge our colleagues (Lauren McLaughlin and Siobhan Saint-Surin) working on these studies for their valuable help. In addition, we would like to thank the following state cancer registries for their help: AL, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, NE, NH, NJ, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, and WY. The AGES-Reykjavik is supported by Contract N01-AG-12100 from the National Institutes on Aging Intramural Research Program; Hjartavernd (the Icelandic Heart Association); and the Althingi (the Icelandic Parliament). In addition, this study was supported by funding from the Harvard Catalyst Award, the Icelandic Cancer Society, the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (P01 CA055075, CA133891, CA42182, CA34944, CA40360, CA141298, CA98233 and CA097193); the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health (HL26490, HL34595). National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health Training Grant (R25 CA098566 and T32 CA09001-35 to SCM); and the Prostate Cancer Foundation (to LAM and JRR); US Army Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program Fellowship (to IMS). CAC was supported in part by NIH NIA Grant P01-AG-009975.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Czeisler has received consulting fees from or served as a paid member of scientific advisory boards for: Bombardier Inc., Boston Red Sox, Boston Celtics, Cephalon, Inc. (acquired by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. October 2011), Michael Jackson’s mother and children, Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V., Novartis, United Parcel Service (UPS), Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Zeo, Inc; owns an equity interest in Lifetrac, Inc., Somnus Therapeutics, Inc. and Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; received royalties from McGraw Hill, Penguin Press/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, and Philips Respironics, Inc.; and has received research support from Cephalon, National Football League Charities, ResMed, and Philips Respironics. Dr. Czeisler is the incumbent of an endowed professorship provided to Harvard University by Cephalon, Inc., holds a number of process patents in the field of sleep/circadian rhythms (e.g., photic resetting of the human circadian pacemaker), and since 1985, has also served as an expert witness on various legal matters related to sleep and/or circadian rhythms.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah C. Markt.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 75 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Markt, S.C., Valdimarsdottir, U.A., Shui, I.M. et al. Circadian clock genes and risk of fatal prostate cancer. Cancer Causes Control 26, 25–33 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-014-0478-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-014-0478-z

Keywords

Navigation