Skip to main content
Log in

Re: Vitamin and mineral use and risk of prostate cancer: the case–control surveillance: Zhang et al. Cancer Causes Control. 2008 Dec 18 [Epub ahead of print]

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Gonzalez A, Peters U, Lampe JW, White Emily (2009) Zinc intake from supplements and diet and prostate cancer. Nutrition Cancer 61:206–215.

References

  1. Zhang Y, Coogan P, Palmer JR, Strom BL, Rosenberg L (2008) Vitamin and mineral use and risk of prostate cancer: the case-control surveillance study. Cancer Causes Control, 2008 Dec 18 [Epub ahead of print]

  2. Taubes G (1995) Epidemiology faces its limits. Science 269:164–169. doi:10.1126/science.7618077

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. (1995) Letters re: the discipline of epidemiology. Science 269:1325–1328

  4. Costello LC, Franklin RB, Tan M (2008) A critical assessment of epidemiology studies regarding dietary/supplemental zinc and prostate cancer risk. Open Urol Nephrol Journa 1:26–35. doi:10.2174/1874303X00801010026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leitzmann MF, Stampfer MJ, Wu K, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Giovannucci EL (2003) Zinc supplement use and risk of prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1004–1007

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kristal AR, Stanford JL, Cohen JH, Wicklund K, Patterson RE (1999) Vitamin and mineral supplement use is associated with reduced risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 8:887–892

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kolonel LN, Yoshizawa CN, Hankin JH (1988) Diet and prostatic cancer: a case-control study in Hawaii. Am J Epidemiol 127:999–1012

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kolonel LN (1996) Nutrition and prostate cancer. Cancer Causes Control 7:44–83. doi:10.1007/BF00115640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. West DW, Slattery ML, Robison LM, French TK, Mahoney AW (1991) Adult dietary intake and prostate cancer risk in Utah: a case-control study with special emphasis on aggressive tumors. Cancer Causes Control 2:85–94. doi:10.1007/BF00053126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Costello LC, Franklin RB, Feng P, Tan M, Bagasra O (2005) Zinc and prostate cancer: a critical scientific, medical and public interest issue. Cancer Causes Control 16:901–915. doi:10.1007/s10552-005-2367-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Costello LC, Franklin RB (2006) The clinical relevance of the metabolism of prostate cancer; zinc and tumor suppression: connecting the dots. Mol Cancer 5:17. doi:10.1186/1476-4598-5-17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Franklin RB, Costello LC (2007) Zinc as an anti-tumor agent in prostate cancer and in other cancers. Arch Biochem Biophys 463:211–217. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2007.02.033

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gori GB (1995) Letters re: the discipline of epidemiology. Science 269:1327–1328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. MacMahon B (1994) Editorial: pesticide residues and breast cancer? J Nat Cancer Inst 86:572–573. doi:10.1093/jnci/86.8.572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leslie C. Costello.

Addendum

Addendum

During the editorial review process of this submission, a new important and relevant reportFootnote 1 had appeared. The results of this new report are at odds with Zhang et al. conclusions. The authors, Gonzalez et al. described that, “An advantage of our cohort is that it was specifically designed to investigate the association of supplement use with cancer risk and accordingly includes a large proportion of high users of dietary supplements. We have a more detailed exposure assessment than other studies, including exact composition of multivitamins and information on use of single zinc supplements.” The major conclusion of the study is that, “the risk of advanced prostate cancer decreased with greater intake of supplemental zinc for 10-year average intake >15 mg/day versus nonuse.” The authors also found that dietary zinc intake was not associated with prostate cancer risk; and observed other weak associations of supplemental zinc use with a reduction of prostate cancer. They conclude that, “If future studies support these results, it may suggest that zinc supplements may be beneficial for some subgroups of men or for the most adverse forms of the disease.

The relevance of the Gonzalez et al. report is that it substantiates the concerns that we have presented in this communication and in our previous critiques of the studies and conclusions of epidemiologic studies. Gonzalez et al., carefully review and contrast their study and the divergent observations and conclusions with those of other epidemiology reports. The study re-affirms our view that there is no consistent basis at this time for any definitive conclusion regarding the role or influence of dietary/supplemental zinc on the development and progression of prostate cancer. It is and has been a disservice and adverse to the interests of the medical, scientific, and pubic communities to promote any proclamations of beneficial or adverse effects of dietary/supplemental zinc on the incidence of prostate cancer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franklin, R.B., Costello, L.C. Re: Vitamin and mineral use and risk of prostate cancer: the case–control surveillance: Zhang et al. Cancer Causes Control. 2008 Dec 18 [Epub ahead of print]. Cancer Causes Control 20, 1529–1531 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-009-9363-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-009-9363-6

Keywords

Navigation