Skip to main content
Log in

The association between social networks and colorectal cancer screening in American males and females: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

We sought to explore the relationship between social networks and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among males and females.

Methods

We examined 960 men and 1,947 women aged 50 years or older who participated in the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey.

Results

Bivariate analysis showed that lower levels of social integration were associated with a lower likelihood of CRC screening for both genders. After controlling for sociodemographic variables, the level of social integration remained independently associated with CRC screening. The link between each component of social networks and CRC screening was also examined. Among men, those who did not have friends/family to talk to about their health were less likely to be screened (OR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.30–0.77). Among women, those who were unmarried (OR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.41–0.93), those who did not have friends/family to talk to about their health (OR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43–0.77), and those who were not a member of any community organizations (OR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.43–0.90) were less likely to be screened.

Conclusion

For both men and women, individuals who were socially isolated were less likely to get CRC screening compared with individuals who were less isolated. The observed gender differences indicate the need for investigation of the social context and the meaning of elements of social networks in men and women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kang SH, Wallace NT, Hyun JK, Morris A, Coffman J, Bloom JR (2007) Social networks and their relationship to mental health service use and expenditures among Medicaid beneficiaries. Psychiatr Serv 58:689–695. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.58.5.689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Loucks EB, Berkman LF, Gruenewald TL, Seeman TE (2005) Social integration is associated with fibrinogen concentration in elderly men. Psychosom Med 67:353–358. doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000160482.89163.e8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kinney AY, Bloor LE, Martin C, Sandler RS (2005) Social ties and colorectal cancer screening among Blacks and Whites in North Carolina. Cancer Epidemiolo Biomarkers Prev 14:182–189

    Google Scholar 

  4. Due P, Holstein B, Lund R, Modvig J, Avlund K (1999) Social relations: network, support and relational strain. Soc Sci Med 48:661–673. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00381-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin N, Ye X, Ensel WM (1999) Social support and depressed mood: a structural analysis. J Health Soc Behav 40:344–359. doi:10.2307/2676330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Berkman LF, Syme SL (1979) Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. Am J Epidemiol 109(2):186–204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bosworth HB, Schaie KW (1997) The relationship of social environment, social networks, and health outcomes in the Seattle Longitudinal study: two analytical approaches. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 52(5):197–205

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen S, Doyle WJ, Skoner DP, Rabin BS, Gwaltney JM Jr (1997) Social ties and susceptibility to the common cold. JAMA 277:1940–1944. doi:10.1001/jama.277.24.1940

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kawachi I, Colditz GA, Ascherio A et al (1996) A prospective study of social networks in relation to total mortality and cardiovascular disease in men in the USA. J Epidemiol Community Health 50:245–251. doi:10.1136/jech.50.3.245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kroenke CH, Kubzansky LD, Schernhammer ES, Holmes MD, Kawachi I (2006) Social networks, social support, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 24(7):1105–1111. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.04.2846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ren SX, Skinner K, Lee A, Kazis L (1999) Social support, social selection and self-assessed health status: results from the Veterans health study in the United States. Soc Sci Med 48:1721–1734. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00069-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sherbourne CD, Meredith LS, Rogers W, Ware JE Jr (1992) Social support and stressful life events: age differences in their effects of health-related quality of life among the chronically ill. Qual Life Res 1(4):235–246. doi:10.1007/BF00435632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Willis L, Goodwin J, Lee K et al (1997) Impact of psychosocial factors on health outcomes in the elderly: a prospective study. J Aging Health 9(3):396–414. doi:10.1177/089826439700900307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wright R (2006) Social support and health outcomes in a multicultural urban population. Soc Work Health Care 43(4):15–28. doi:10.1300/J010v43n04_02

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sultan S, Fisher DA, Voils CL, Yinney AY, Sandler RS, Provenzale D (2004) Impact of functional support on health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer 101(12):2737–2743. doi:10.1002/cncr.20699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang SH, Bloom JR, Romano PS (1994) Cancer screening among African–American women: their use of tests and social support. Am J Public Health 84(1):101–103. doi:10.2105/AJPH.84.1.101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Suarez L, Ramirez AG, Villarreal R et al (2000) Social networks and cancer screening in four U.S. Hispanic groups. Am J Prev Med 19(1):47–52. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00155-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Farmer D, Reddick B, D’Agostino R, Jackson SA (2007) Psychosocial correlates of mammography screening in older African–American women. Oncol Nurs Forum 34(1):117–123. doi:10.1188/07.ONF.117-123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Honda K, Kagawa-Singer M (2006) Cognitive mediators linking social support networks to colorectal cancer screening adherence. J Behav Med 29:449–460. doi:10.1007/s10865-006-9068-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gili M, Roca M, Ferrer V, Obrador A, Cabeza E (2006) Psychosocial factors associated with the adherence to a colorectal cancer screening program. Cancer Detect Prev 30:354–360. doi:10.1016/j.cdp.2006.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tannen D (1990) You just don’t understand: men and women in conversation. Ballantine, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Antonucci TC, Akiyama H (1987) An examination of sex differences in social support among older men and women. Sex Roles 17:737–749. doi:10.1007/BF00287685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Umberson D (1992) Gender, marital status and the social control of health behavior. Soc Sci Med 34:907–917. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90259-S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cantor D, Covell J, Davis T, Park I, Rizzo L (2005) Health Information National Trends Survey 2005: final report. Available at: http://hints.cancer.gov/docs/HINTS_2005_Final_Report.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2008

  25. Michael YL, Berkman LF, Colditz GA, Holmes MD, Kawachi I (2002) Social networks and health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors: A prospective study. J Psychosom Res 52:285–293. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00270-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fratiglioni L, Wang H, Ericsson K, Maytan M, Winblad B (2000) Influence of social network on occurrence of dementia: a community-based longitudinal study. Lancet 355:1315–1319. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02113-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Katz ML, James AS, Pignone MP et al (2004) Colorectal cancer screening among African–American church members: a qualitative and quantitative study of patient-provider communication. BMC Public Health 4:62. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-4-62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2008) Colorectal cancer risk by age. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/statistics/age.htm. Accessed November 22, 2008

  29. Lewis MA, Rook KS (1999) Social control in personal relationships: impact on health behaviors and psychological distress. Health Psychol 18:63–71. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.18.1.63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Seeman T (2001) Social ties and health: the benefits of social integration. Ann Epidemiol 6:442–451. doi:10.1016/S1047-2797(96)00095-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rennemark M, Hagberg B (1999) Gender specific associations between social network and health behavior in old age. Aging Ment Health 3:320–327. doi:10.1080/13607869956460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Westmaas J, Wild TC (2002) Effect of gender in social control of smoking cessation. Health Psycho 21:368–376. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.21.4.368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gregson S, Terceira N, Mushati P, Nyamukapa C, Campbell C (2004) Community group participation: can it help young women to avoid HIV? An exploratory study of social capital and school education in rural Zimbabwe. Soc Sci Med 58:2119–2132. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Veenstra G (2000) Social capital, SES, and health: an individual level analysis. Soc Sci Med 50:619–629. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00307-X

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiali Ye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ye, J., Williams, S.D. & Xu, Z. The association between social networks and colorectal cancer screening in American males and females: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey. Cancer Causes Control 20, 1227–1233 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-009-9335-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-009-9335-x

Keywords

Navigation