Abstract
Objectives
We sought to explore the relationship between social networks and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among males and females.
Methods
We examined 960 men and 1,947 women aged 50 years or older who participated in the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey.
Results
Bivariate analysis showed that lower levels of social integration were associated with a lower likelihood of CRC screening for both genders. After controlling for sociodemographic variables, the level of social integration remained independently associated with CRC screening. The link between each component of social networks and CRC screening was also examined. Among men, those who did not have friends/family to talk to about their health were less likely to be screened (OR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.30–0.77). Among women, those who were unmarried (OR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.41–0.93), those who did not have friends/family to talk to about their health (OR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43–0.77), and those who were not a member of any community organizations (OR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.43–0.90) were less likely to be screened.
Conclusion
For both men and women, individuals who were socially isolated were less likely to get CRC screening compared with individuals who were less isolated. The observed gender differences indicate the need for investigation of the social context and the meaning of elements of social networks in men and women.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kang SH, Wallace NT, Hyun JK, Morris A, Coffman J, Bloom JR (2007) Social networks and their relationship to mental health service use and expenditures among Medicaid beneficiaries. Psychiatr Serv 58:689–695. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.58.5.689
Loucks EB, Berkman LF, Gruenewald TL, Seeman TE (2005) Social integration is associated with fibrinogen concentration in elderly men. Psychosom Med 67:353–358. doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000160482.89163.e8
Kinney AY, Bloor LE, Martin C, Sandler RS (2005) Social ties and colorectal cancer screening among Blacks and Whites in North Carolina. Cancer Epidemiolo Biomarkers Prev 14:182–189
Due P, Holstein B, Lund R, Modvig J, Avlund K (1999) Social relations: network, support and relational strain. Soc Sci Med 48:661–673. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00381-5
Lin N, Ye X, Ensel WM (1999) Social support and depressed mood: a structural analysis. J Health Soc Behav 40:344–359. doi:10.2307/2676330
Berkman LF, Syme SL (1979) Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. Am J Epidemiol 109(2):186–204
Bosworth HB, Schaie KW (1997) The relationship of social environment, social networks, and health outcomes in the Seattle Longitudinal study: two analytical approaches. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 52(5):197–205
Cohen S, Doyle WJ, Skoner DP, Rabin BS, Gwaltney JM Jr (1997) Social ties and susceptibility to the common cold. JAMA 277:1940–1944. doi:10.1001/jama.277.24.1940
Kawachi I, Colditz GA, Ascherio A et al (1996) A prospective study of social networks in relation to total mortality and cardiovascular disease in men in the USA. J Epidemiol Community Health 50:245–251. doi:10.1136/jech.50.3.245
Kroenke CH, Kubzansky LD, Schernhammer ES, Holmes MD, Kawachi I (2006) Social networks, social support, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 24(7):1105–1111. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.04.2846
Ren SX, Skinner K, Lee A, Kazis L (1999) Social support, social selection and self-assessed health status: results from the Veterans health study in the United States. Soc Sci Med 48:1721–1734. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00069-6
Sherbourne CD, Meredith LS, Rogers W, Ware JE Jr (1992) Social support and stressful life events: age differences in their effects of health-related quality of life among the chronically ill. Qual Life Res 1(4):235–246. doi:10.1007/BF00435632
Willis L, Goodwin J, Lee K et al (1997) Impact of psychosocial factors on health outcomes in the elderly: a prospective study. J Aging Health 9(3):396–414. doi:10.1177/089826439700900307
Wright R (2006) Social support and health outcomes in a multicultural urban population. Soc Work Health Care 43(4):15–28. doi:10.1300/J010v43n04_02
Sultan S, Fisher DA, Voils CL, Yinney AY, Sandler RS, Provenzale D (2004) Impact of functional support on health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer 101(12):2737–2743. doi:10.1002/cncr.20699
Kang SH, Bloom JR, Romano PS (1994) Cancer screening among African–American women: their use of tests and social support. Am J Public Health 84(1):101–103. doi:10.2105/AJPH.84.1.101
Suarez L, Ramirez AG, Villarreal R et al (2000) Social networks and cancer screening in four U.S. Hispanic groups. Am J Prev Med 19(1):47–52. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00155-0
Farmer D, Reddick B, D’Agostino R, Jackson SA (2007) Psychosocial correlates of mammography screening in older African–American women. Oncol Nurs Forum 34(1):117–123. doi:10.1188/07.ONF.117-123
Honda K, Kagawa-Singer M (2006) Cognitive mediators linking social support networks to colorectal cancer screening adherence. J Behav Med 29:449–460. doi:10.1007/s10865-006-9068-1
Gili M, Roca M, Ferrer V, Obrador A, Cabeza E (2006) Psychosocial factors associated with the adherence to a colorectal cancer screening program. Cancer Detect Prev 30:354–360. doi:10.1016/j.cdp.2006.06.005
Tannen D (1990) You just don’t understand: men and women in conversation. Ballantine, New York
Antonucci TC, Akiyama H (1987) An examination of sex differences in social support among older men and women. Sex Roles 17:737–749. doi:10.1007/BF00287685
Umberson D (1992) Gender, marital status and the social control of health behavior. Soc Sci Med 34:907–917. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90259-S
Cantor D, Covell J, Davis T, Park I, Rizzo L (2005) Health Information National Trends Survey 2005: final report. Available at: http://hints.cancer.gov/docs/HINTS_2005_Final_Report.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2008
Michael YL, Berkman LF, Colditz GA, Holmes MD, Kawachi I (2002) Social networks and health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors: A prospective study. J Psychosom Res 52:285–293. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00270-7
Fratiglioni L, Wang H, Ericsson K, Maytan M, Winblad B (2000) Influence of social network on occurrence of dementia: a community-based longitudinal study. Lancet 355:1315–1319. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02113-9
Katz ML, James AS, Pignone MP et al (2004) Colorectal cancer screening among African–American church members: a qualitative and quantitative study of patient-provider communication. BMC Public Health 4:62. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-4-62
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2008) Colorectal cancer risk by age. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/statistics/age.htm. Accessed November 22, 2008
Lewis MA, Rook KS (1999) Social control in personal relationships: impact on health behaviors and psychological distress. Health Psychol 18:63–71. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.18.1.63
Seeman T (2001) Social ties and health: the benefits of social integration. Ann Epidemiol 6:442–451. doi:10.1016/S1047-2797(96)00095-6
Rennemark M, Hagberg B (1999) Gender specific associations between social network and health behavior in old age. Aging Ment Health 3:320–327. doi:10.1080/13607869956460
Westmaas J, Wild TC (2002) Effect of gender in social control of smoking cessation. Health Psycho 21:368–376. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.21.4.368
Gregson S, Terceira N, Mushati P, Nyamukapa C, Campbell C (2004) Community group participation: can it help young women to avoid HIV? An exploratory study of social capital and school education in rural Zimbabwe. Soc Sci Med 58:2119–2132. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.001
Veenstra G (2000) Social capital, SES, and health: an individual level analysis. Soc Sci Med 50:619–629. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00307-X
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ye, J., Williams, S.D. & Xu, Z. The association between social networks and colorectal cancer screening in American males and females: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey. Cancer Causes Control 20, 1227–1233 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-009-9335-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-009-9335-x