Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A population-based study of survival in patients with secondary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): impact of type and treatment of primary cancers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) following treatment with chemotherapy or irradiation are termed ‘secondary’ MDS. Clinical observations suggest a worse prognosis for secondary than for primary MDS, but differences in survival have not been studied in a general population sample.

Methods

We analyzed data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program to describe survival in MDS patients according to previous cancer diagnosis. Our study included 3,938 MDS cases diagnosed in 2001–2004 and reported by registries which have participated in SEER since the 1970s.

Results

A previous cancer diagnosis (26% of MDS cases) was associated with 13% increased risk of death from any cause among MDS cases (hazard ratio [HR]=1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–1.25). Radiation treatment for a previous cancer was associated with 52% increased risk of death (95% CI: 1.15–2.02). Shortened survival was most pronounced if the latency between the previous cancer and MDS was less than five years, including lung cancer diagnosed in the year preceding MDS (HR = 3.43, 95% CI: 1.93–6.10) and lymphohematopoietic cancer 1–5 years before MDS (HR = 2.11; 95% CI: 1.33–3.36).

Conclusions

Our results confirm a more severe prognosis for secondary MDS than for primary MDS, associated with certain types and treatments of previous cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Konstantopoulos K, Lauren L, Hast R, Reizenstein P (1989) Survival, hospitalization and cause of death in 99 patients with the myelodysplastic syndrome. Anticancer Res 9:893–896

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Finch SC (2004) Myelodysplasia and radiation. Radiat Res 161:603–606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Levine EG, Bloomfield CD (1992) Leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes secondary to drug, radiation, and environmental exposure. Semin Oncol 19:47–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Belli C, Acevedo S, Bengio R, Arrossagaray G, Watman N, Rossi N, Garcia J, Flores G, Goldztein S, Larripa I (2002) Detection of risk groups in myelodysplastic syndromes. A multicenter study. Haematologica 87:9–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Germing U, Strupp C, Kuendgen A, Isa S, Knipp S, Hildebrandt B, Giagounidis A, Aul C, Gattermann N, Haas R (2006) Prospective validation of the WHO proposals for the classification of myelodysplastic syndromes. Haematologica 91:1596–1604

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, Fenaux P, Morel P, Sanz G, Sanz M, Vallespi T, Hamblin T, Oscier D, Ohyashiki K, Toyama K, Aul C, Mufti G, Bennett J (1997) International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 89:2079–2088

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Aul C, Gattermann N, Heyll A, Germing U, Derigs G, Schneider W (1992) Primary myelodysplastic syndromes: analysis of prognostic factors in 235 patients and proposals for an improved scoring system. Leukemia 6:52–59

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Morel P, Hebbar M, Lai JL, Duhamel A, Preudhomme C, Wattel E, Bauters F, Fenaux P (1993) Cytogenetic analysis has strong independent prognostic value in de novo myelodysplastic syndromes and can be incorporated in a new scoring system: a report on 408 cases. Leukemia 7:1315–1323

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sperr WR, Wimazal F, Kundi M, Fonatsch C, Thalhammer-Scherrer R, Schernthaner GH, Schwarzinger I, Haas OA, Geissler K, Lechner K, Valent P (2001) Survival analysis and AML development in patients with de novo myelodysplastic syndromes: comparison of six different prognostic scoring systems. Ann Hematol 80:272–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Navarro I, Ruiz MA, Cabello A, Collado R, Ferrer R, Hueso J, Martinez J, Miguel A, Orero MT, Perez P, Nolasco A, Carbonell F (2006) Classification and scoring systems in myelodysplastic syndromes: a retrospective analysis of 311 patients. Leuk Res 30:971–977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma X, Does M, Raza A, Mayne ST (2007) Myelodysplastic syndromes: incidence and survival in the United States. Cancer 109:1536–1542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin L, Parkin DM, Whelan S (eds) (2000) International classification of diseases for oncology, 3rd edn. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  13. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) (2007) Program (http://www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 17 Regs Limited-Use, Nov 2006 Sub (1973–2004 varying) - Linked To County Attributes - Total U.S., 1969–2004 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, released April 2007, based on the November 2006 submission

  14. Warren JL, Harlan LC (2003) Can cancer registry data be used to study cancer treatment? Med Care 41:1003–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Catenacci DV, Schiller GJ (2005) Myelodysplasic syndromes: a comprehensive review. Blood Rev 19:301–319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rubin CM, Larson RA, Anastasi J, Winter JN, Thangavelu M, Vardiman JW, Rowley JD, Le Beau MM (1990) t(3;21)(q26;q22): a recurring chromosomal abnormality in therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 76:2594–2598

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bloomfield CD (1986) Chromosome abnormalities in secondary myelodysplastic syndromes. Scand J Haematol Suppl 45:82–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Iurlo A, Mecucci C, Van Orshoven A, Michaux JL, Boogaerts M, Noens L, Bosly A, Louwagie A, Van Den BH (1989) Cytogenetic and clinical investigations in 76 cases with therapy-related leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 43:227–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pedersen-Bjergaard J, Philip P, Pedersen NT, Hou-Jensen K, Svejgaard A, Jensen G, Nissen NI (1984) Acute nonlymphocytic leukemia, preleukemia, and acute myeloproliferative syndrome secondary to treatment of other malignant diseases. II. Bone marrow cytology, cytogenetics, results of HLA typing, response to antileukemic chemotherapy, and survival in a total series of 55 patients. Cancer 54:452–462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Malin JL, Kahn KL, Adams J, Kwan L, Laouri M, Ganz PA (2002) Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:835–844

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cress RD, Zaslavsky AM, West DW, Wolf RE, Felter MC, Ayanian JZ (2003) Completeness of information on adjuvant therapies for colorectal cancer in population-based cancer registries. Med Care 41:1006–1012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dang SP, Liberman BA, Shepherd FA, Messner H, Tweeddale M, Gardner HA, Colgan T, Rose TH, Evans WK (1986) Therapy-related leukemia and myelodysplasia in small-cell lung cancer. Report of a case and results of morphologic, cytogenetic, and bone marrow culture studies in long-term survivors. Arch Intern Med 146:1689–1694

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Oshita F, Tamura T, Kojima A, Yamada K, Fukuda M, Nakagawa K, Ohe Y, Sasaki Y, Eguchi K, Shinkai T (1991) Late toxicities and complications in three-year survivors of small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer 27:427–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hake CR, Graubert TA, Fenske TS (2007) Does autologous transplantation directly increase the risk of secondary leukemia in lymphoma patients? Bone Marrow Transplant 39:59–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pedersen-Bjergaard J, Osterlind K, Hansen M, Philip P, Pedersen AG, Hansen HH (1985) Acute nonlymphocytic leukemia, preleukemia, and solid tumors following intensive chemotherapy of small cell carcinoma of the lung. Blood 66:1393–1397

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chak LY, Sikic BI, Tucker MA, Horns RC Jr, Cox RS (1984) Increased incidence of acute nonlymphocytic leukemia following therapy in patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung. J Clin Oncol 2:385–390

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mamuris Z, Dumont J, Dutrillaux B, Aurias A (1989) Chromosomal differences between acute nonlymphocytic leukemia in patients with prior solid tumors and prior hematologic malignancies. A study of 14 cases with prior breast cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 42:43–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Strom SS, Gu Y, Gruschkus SK, Pierce SA, Estey EH (2005) Risk factors of myelodysplastic syndromes: a case-control study. Leukemia 19:1912–1918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sheibani K, Bukowski RM, Tubbs RR, Savage RA, Sebek BA, Hoffman GC (1980) Acute nonlymphocytic leukemia in patients receiving chemotherapy for nonmalignant diseases. Hum Pathol 11:175–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Singh ZN, Huo D, Anastasi J, Smith SM, Karrison T, Le Beau MM, Larson RA, Vardiman JW (2007) Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome: morphologic subclassification may not be clinically relevant. Am J Clin Pathol 127:197–205

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Haus O, Kotlarek-Haus S, Potoczek S, Czarnecka M, Duszenko E, Makowska I, Mirowska N, Kuliczkowski K (2006) Myelodysplastic syndromes according to FAB and WHO classification. Single center experience. Neoplasma 53:136–143

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bowles KM, Warner BA, Baglin TP (2006) Platelet mass has prognostic value in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol 135(2):198–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lorand-Metze I, Pinheiro MP, Ribeiro E, de Paula EV, Metze K (2004) Factors influencing survival in myelodysplastic syndromes in a Brazilian population: comparison of FAB and WHO classifications. Leuk Res 28:587–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pfeilstocker M, Reisner R, Nosslinger T, Gruner H, Nowotny H, Tuchler H, Schlogl E, Pittermann E, Heinz R (1999) Cross-validation of prognostic scores in myelodysplastic syndromes on 386 patients from a single institution confirms importance of cytogenetics. Br J Haematol 106:455–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anneclaire J. De Roos.

Additional information

Financial support: Dr. De Roos’ and Dr. Davis’ work was supported by a grant from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program of the National Cancer Institute (NO1-PC-55020-20), and Dr. Deeg’s work was supported by grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (HL36444 and HL082941).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Roos, A.J., Deeg, H.J. & Davis, S. A population-based study of survival in patients with secondary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): impact of type and treatment of primary cancers. Cancer Causes Control 18, 1199–1208 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-007-9060-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-007-9060-2

Keywords

Navigation