Abstract
In recent years, the sharing economy (SE) has attracted considerable attention, both scholarly and popular, relating to its capacity to enforce or undermine extant economic conventions. However, the process through which technological developments can effectively have this outcome of altering extant conventions on what is morally acceptable or desirable is still unclear. In this paper, we draw on the work of Boltanski and Thévenot (On justification: economies of worth. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2006) and the notion of agencement to investigate the moral and performative dimension of controversies related to the SE. The research stems from a qualitative case-based study of the controversy following Uber’s implementation in Montréal’s taxi market. We contribute to the literature on the SE through an empirical study of the moral debates entailed in the unfolding in situ of a SE device. We also add to the literature using the ‘Orders of Worth’ framework (2006) by showing how a compromise is solidified. We find that beyond discursive strategies, it is the concrete recomposition of laws, conventions, devices, persons, etc. that harmonised different definitions of the common good. Finally, we contribute to the literature on the relationship between technology, ethics, and social change by capturing the specific values that legitimise Uber, and by following their unfolding throughout a controversy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acquier, A., Daudigeos, T., & Pinkse, J. (2017). Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: An organizing framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.006.
Alcadipani, R., & Hassard, J. (2010). Actor-Network Theory, organizations and critique: Towards a politics of organizing. Organization, 17(4), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508410364441.
Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 881–898. https://doi.org/10.1086/666376.
Belk, R. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1086/612649.
Belk, R. (2014). Sharing versus pseudo-sharing in Web 2.0. The Anthropologist, 18(1), 7–23.
Boadle, A. (2018, October 20). Facebook’s WhatsApp flooded with fake news in Brazil Election.
Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, È. (2011). Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme [The new spirit of capitalism]. Paris: Gallimard.
Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1991). De la justification: les économies de la grandeur [On justification: Economies of worth]. Paris: Gallimard.
Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. (trans: Porter, C.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2011). What’s mine is yours: How collaborative consumption is changing the way we live. London: Collins.
Callon, M. (1998). Laws of the markets. London: Wiley.
Callon, M. (2017). L’emprise des marchés : comprendre leur fonctionnement pour pouvoir les changer. Paris: La Découverte.
Cloutier, C., Gond, J.-P., & Leca, B. (2017). Justification, evaluation and critique in the study of organizations: An introduction to the volume. In Justification, evaluation and critique in the study of organizations (pp. 3–29). Emerald Publishing Limited. http://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20170000052001.
Dionne, K.-E., Mailhot, C., & Langley, A. (2018). Modeling the evaluation process in a public controversy. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617747918.
Fisman, R., & Luca, M. (2016, December). Fixing discrimination in online marketplaces. Harvard Business Review.
Gherardi, S. (2016). To start practice theorizing anew: The contribution of the concepts of agencement and formativeness. Organization, 23(5), 680–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508415605174.
Gond, J. P., Barin Cruz, L., Raufflet, E., & Charron, M. (2016). To frack or not to frack? The interaction of justification and power in a sustainability controversy. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 330–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12166.
Introna, L. D. (2014). Otherness and the letting-be of becoming: Or, ethics beyond bifurcation. In P. R. Carlile, D. Nicolini, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), How matter matters: Objects, artifacts, and materiality in organization studies (pp. 260–287). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lafaye, C., & Thévenot, L. (1993). Une justification écologique? Conflits dans l’aménagement de la nature [An ecological justification? Conflicts in the management of nature]. Revue Française de Sociologie, 34(4), 495–524. https://doi.org/10.2307/3321928.
Lamberton, C. P., & Rose, R. L. (2012). When ours is better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.10.0368.
Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.
Lashinsky, A. (2017). Wild ride: Inside Uber’s quest for world domination. London: Penguin Books Limited.
Laurell, C., & Sandström, C. (2017). The sharing economy in social media: Analyzing tensions between market and non-market logics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.038.
Lemieux, C. (2014). The moral idealism of ordinary people as a sociological challenge: Reflections on the French reception of Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot’s “On Justification”. In S. Susen & B. S. Turner (Eds.), The spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the “Pragmatic Sociology of Critique” (pp. 153–170). New York: Anthem Press.
Mair, J., & Reischauer, G. (2017). Capturing the dynamics of the sharing economy: Institutional research on the plural forms and practices of sharing economy organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.023.
Malhotra, A., & Van Alstyne, M. (2014). The dark side of the sharing economy… and how to lighten it. Communications of the ACM, 57(11), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/2668893.
Martin, K. (2018). Ethical implications and accountability of algorithms. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3921-3.
Martin, K., & Freeman, R. E. (2004). The separation of technology and ethics in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 353–364.
Morozov, E. (2013). The “sharing economy undermines workers” rights (web log post). The Financial Times.
Murillo, D., Buckland, H., & Val, E. (2017). When the sharing economy becomes neoliberalism on steroids: Unravelling the controversies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.024.
Nyberg, D., Wright, C., & Kirk, J. (2017). Re-producing a neoliberal political regime: Competing justifications and dominance in disputing fracking. In Justification, evaluation and critique in the study of organizations: Contributions from French pragmatist sociology (pp. 143–171). Emerald Publishing Limited. http://doi.org/10.1108.
Patriotta, G., Gond, J.-P. P., & Schultz, F. (2011). Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth, and public justifications. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1804–1836. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00990.x.
Péloquin, T. (2016). La chute de la valeur des permis de taxi se confirme. La Presse.
Roscoe, P., & Chillas, S. (2014). The state of affairs: Critical performativity and the online dating industry. Organization, 21(6), 797–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508413485497.
Schor, J. B., & Fitzmaurice, C. J. (2015). Collaborating and Connecting: The emergence of the sharing economy. In L. A. Reisch & J. Thogersen (Eds.), Handbook on research on sustainable consumption (pp. 410–425). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Stark, D. (2009). The sense of dissonance: Accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sundararajan, A. (2016). The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Taupin, B. (2012). The more things change… Institutional maintenance as justification work in the credit rating industry. M@N@GEMENT, 15(5), 529–562.
Tomalty, R. (2014). Ours is better than your. Alternatives Journal (A\J): Canada’s Environmental Voice, 40(2), 18–22.
West, S. M. (2017). Data capitalism: Redefining the logics of surveillance and privacy. Business and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317718185.
Whelan, G. (2018). Trust in surveillance: A reply to Etzioni. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3779-4.
Whelan, G. (2019). Born political: A dispositive analysis of Google and copyright. Business and Society, 58(1), 42–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317717701.
Whelan, G., & Gond, J.-P. (2017). Meat your enemy: Animal rights, alignment, and radical change. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492616671828.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the Ethical Standards of the Institutional and/or National Research Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
For this type of study formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mercier-Roy, M., Mailhot, C. What’s in an App? Investigating the Moral Struggles Behind a Sharing Economy Device. J Bus Ethics 159, 977–996 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04207-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04207-7