Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Link Between (Not) Practicing CSR and Corporate Reputation: Psychological Foundations and Managerial Implications

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is often assumed that corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a very promising way for corporations to improve their reputations, and a positive link between practicing CSR and corporate reputation is supported by empirical evidence. However, little is known about the mechanisms that underlie this relationship. In addition, the effects of not practicing CSR on corporate reputation have received little attention thus far. This paper contributes to the literature by analyzing the cause-and-effect relationships between (not) practicing CSR and corporate reputation. To this end, the paper draws on a psychological framework, in particular, on insights from expectancy violations theory and attribution theory. Building on the ideal-type distinction between CSR in terms of voluntary engagement for society (“doing good”) and the prevention of irresponsible behavior (“avoiding bad”), the paper develops four propositions that unveil some fundamental cause-and-effect relationships between (not) practicing CSR, irresponsible behavior, and corporate reputation. In doing so, it also addresses the question under which conditions CSR leads to a buffering or backfiring effect on corporate reputation in the event of irresponsible behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afifi, W. A., & Burgoon, J. K. (2000). The impact of violations on uncertainty and the consequences for attractiveness. Human Communication Research, 26(2), 203–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguinis, H. (2011). Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 855–879). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. R. (1999). On the nature of the reputational penalty for corporate crime: Evidence. The Journal of Law and Economics, 42(S1), 489–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, M., & Skjoett-Larsen, T. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(3), 258–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aßländer, M. S. (2013). Honorableness or beneficialness? Cicero on natural law, virtues, glory, and (corporate) reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(4), 751–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholow, B. D., Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2001). A psychophysiological examination of cognitive processing of and affective responses to social expectancy violations. Psychological Science, 12(3), 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucus, M. S., & Baucus, D. A. (1997). Paying the piper: An empirical examination of longer-term financial consequences of illegal corporate behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 129–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R., & Gabriel, H. (2001). Reputation, trust and supplier commitment: The case of shipping company/seaport relations. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 16(6), 424–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertels, S., & Peloza, J. (2008). Running just to stand still? Managing CSR reputation in an era of ratcheting expectations. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(1), 56–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., Korschun, D., & Sen, S. (2009). Strengthening stakeholder-company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 257–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, I., & Lin-Hi, N. (2015). Business case-driven management of CSR: Does managers’ “cherry picking” behavior foster irresponsible business practices? Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 33(4), 321–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1988). Vive la crise! For heterodoxy in social science. Theory and Society, 17(5), 773–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2005). Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2005). Corporate reputation and an insurance motivation for corporate social investment. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2005(20), 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 435–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 111–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N., & Deegan, C. (1998). The public disclosure of environmental performance information—A dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 29(1), 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunk, K. H., & Blümelhuber, C. (2011). One strike and you’re out: Qualitative insights into the formation of consumers’ ethical company or brand perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 64(2), 134–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundy, J., & Pfarrer, M. (2015). A burden of responsibility: The role of social approval at the onset of a crisis. Academy of Management Review, 40(3), 345–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12(1–2), 30–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1988). Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Communications Monographs, 55(1), 58–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., & LePoire, B. A. (1993). Effects of communication expectancies, actual communication, and expectancy disconfirmation on evaluations of communicators and their communication behavior. Human Communication Research, 20(1), 67–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cable, D. M., & Turban, D. B. (2003). The value of organizational reputation in the recruitment context: A brand-equity perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(11), 2244–2266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, Y. M., & Faulkner, D. O. (2005). The strategy of reputation. Strategic Change, 14(8), 413–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1998). The four faces of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 100(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S., & Kim, Y. C. (2012). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a halo effect in issue management: Public response to negative news about pro-social local private companies. Asian Journal of Communication, 22(4), 372–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (1996). Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experimental study in crisis communication. Journal of Public Relations Research, 8(4), 279–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2012). Managing corporate social responsibility: A communication approach. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2015). CSR as crisis risk: Expanding how we conceptualize the relationship. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2), 144–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, D. H. (2004). Consumer reaction to negative publicity effects of corporate reputation, response, and responsibility for a crisis event. Journal of Business Communication, 41(2), 192–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1091–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y., & Xu, K. (2014). Chinese employees negotiating differing conflict management expectations in a US-based multinational corporation subsidiary in southwest China. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(4), 609–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dentchev, N. A., & Heene, A. (2004). Managing the reputation of restructuring corporations: Send the right signal to the right stakeholder. Journal of Public Affairs, 4(1), 56–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doh, J. P., Howton, S. D., Howton, S. W., & Siegel, D. S. (2010). Does the market respond to an endorsement of social responsibility? The role of institutions, information, and legitimacy. Journal of Management, 36(6), 1461–1485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, G. R., & Moran, P. (2012). Corporate reputations: Built in or bolted on? California Management Review, 54(2), 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhigg, C., & Barboza, D. (2012). In China, human costs are built into an iPad. Retrieved March 30, 2016, from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/26/business/ieconomy-apples-ipad-and-the-human-costs-for-workers-in-china.html?_r=2&hp=&pagewanted=all.

  • Eisingerich, A. B., Rubera, G., Seifert, M., & Bhardwaj, G. (2011). Doing good and doing better despite negative information? The role of corporate social responsibility in consumer resistance to negative information. Journal of Service Research, 14(1), 60–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falck, O., & Heblich, S. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: Doing well by doing good. Business Horizons, 50(3), 247–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatma, M., Rahman, Z., & Khan, I. (2015). Building company reputation and brand equity through CSR: The mediating role of trust. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 33(6), 840–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, E., & Reuber, R. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unfamiliar: The challenges of reputation formation facing new firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(1), 53–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkes, V. S. (1984). Consumer reactions to product failure: An attributional approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(4), 398–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkes, V. S., & Kamins, M. A. (1999). Effects of information about firms’ ethical and unethical actions on consumers’ attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 243–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., & Van Riel, C. (1997). The reputational landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(1–2), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., Gardberg, N. A., & Barnett, M. L. (2000). Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 85–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fragale, A. R., Rosen, B., Xu, C., & Merideth, I. (2009). The higher they are, the harder they fall: The effects of wrongdoer status on observer punishment recommendations and intentionality attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbreath, J. (2010). How does corporate social responsibility benefit firms? Evidence from Australia. European Business Review, 22(4), 411–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbreath, J., & Shum, P. (2012). Do customer satisfaction and reputation mediate the CSR-FP link? Evidence from Australia. Australian Journal of Management, 37(2), 211–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardberg, N. A., & Fombrun, C. J. (2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 329–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, S. J., Malaviya, P., & Sternthal, B. (2004). The influence of negation on product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 583–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald, G., & Hempelmann, B. (2010). Impacts of reputation for quality on perceptions of company responsibility and product-related dangers in times of product-recall and public complaints crises: Results from an empirical investigation. Corporate Reputation Review, 13(4), 264–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. (1992). The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, S. (2007). The role of corporate reputation in determining investor satisfaction and loyalty. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(1), 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, S., & Tolsdorf, J. (2013). How does corporate reputation affect customer loyalty in a corporate crisis? Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 21(3), 144–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbig, P., & Milewicz, J. (1993). The relationship of reputation and credibility to brand success. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10(3), 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D., Rogovsky, N., & Dunfee, T. W. (2002). The next wave of corporate community involvement: Corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 44(2), 110–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Highhouse, S., Brooks, M. E., & Gregarus, G. (2009). An organizational impression management perspective on the formation of corporate reputations. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1481–1493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillenbrand, C., & Money, K. (2007). Corporate responsibility and corporate reputation: Two separate concepts or two sides of the same coin? Corporate Reputation Review, 10(4), 261–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillenbrand, C., & Money, K. (2009). Segmenting stakeholders in terms of corporate responsibility: Implications for reputation management. Australasian Marketing Journal, 17(2), 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoejmose, S. U., Roehrich, J. K., & Grosvold, J. (2014). Is doing more doing better? The relationship between responsible supply chain management and corporate reputation. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(1), 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, K. T. (2012). The advertising effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate reputation and brand equity: Evidence from the life insurance industry in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hur, W. M., Kim, H., & Woo, J. (2014). How CSR leads to corporate brand equity: Mediating mechanisms of corporate brand credibility and reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, C., Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2015). Corporate crises in the age of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 58(2), 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219–266). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R., & Murrell, A. J. (2001). Signaling positive corporate social performance: An event study of family-friendly firms. Business and Society, 40(1), 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, B. K. (1994). Consumer reaction to company-related disasters: The effect of multiple versus single explanations. Advances in Consumer Research, 21(1), 348–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpoff, J. M., & Lott, J. R. (1993). Reputational penalty firms bear from committing criminal fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 36(2), 757–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 457–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilcullen, M., & Ohles Kooistra, J. (1999). At least do no harm: Sources on the changing role of business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Reference Services Review, 27(2), 158–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, P. S., Qian, C., & Wang, H. (2014). Firm litigation risk and the insurance value of corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(10), 1464–1482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C. S., Chiu, C. J., Yang, C. F., & Pai, D. C. (2010). The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand performance: The mediating effect of industrial brand equity and corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 457–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, D., & Washburn, N. T. (2012). Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 300–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin-Hi, N., & Müller, K. (2013). The CSR bottom line: Preventing corporate social irresponsibility. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1928–1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin-Hi, N., Hörisch, J., & Blumberg, I. (2014). Does CSR matter for nonprofit organizations? Testing the link between CSR performance and trustworthiness in the nonprofit versus for-profit domain. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(5), 1944–1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maden, C., Arıkan, E., Telci, E. E., & Kantur, D. (2012). Linking corporate social responsibility to corporate reputation: A study on understanding behavioral consequences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 655–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, J. F. (2002). Corporate reputation research agenda using strategy and stakeholder literature. Business and Society, 41(4), 415–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Ferrell, L. (2005). A stakeholder model for implementing social responsibility in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 39(9/10), 956–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2011). Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1480–1495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melo, T., & Garrido-Morgado, A. (2012). Corporate reputation: A combination of social responsibility and industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(1), 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mena, S., Rintamäki, J., Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2015). On the forgetting of corporate irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review,. doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T., & Turnbull, W. (1986). Expectancies and interpersonal processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 37(1), 233–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minor, D. (2013). The value of corporate citizenship: Protection. Working paper, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University.

  • Minor, D., & Morgan, J. (2011). CSR as reputation insurance: Primum non nocere. California Management Review, 53(3), 40–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishina, Y., Block, E. S., & Mannor, M. J. (2012). The path dependence of organizational reputation: How social judgment influences assessments of capability and character. Strategic Management Journal, 33(5), 459–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, K. B., & Vogel, C. M. (1997). Using a hierarchy-of-effects approach to gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward the firm: Financial versus nonfinancial impacts. Journal of Business Research, 38(2), 141–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mzembe, A. N., Lindgreen, A., Maon, F., & Vanhamme, J. (2015). Investigating the drivers of corporate social responsibility in the global tea supply chain: A case study of Eastern Produce Limited in Malawi. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,. doi:10.1002/csr.1370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevid, J. S. (2012). Essentials in social psychology: Concepts and applications (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville, B. A., Bell, S. J., & Mengüç, B. (2005). Corporate reputation, stakeholders and the social performance-financial performance relationship. European Journal of Marketing, 39(9/10), 1184–1198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, N. (2010). Competence and benevolence of contact personnel in the perceived corporate reputation: An empirical study in financial services. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(4), 345–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okoye, A. (2009). Theorising corporate social responsibility as an essentially contested concept: Is a definition necessary? Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 613–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, H., & Rees, K. (2008). Motivators of fair labor management and the role of top management in the US clothing/footwear industry. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 12(4), 487–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park-Poaps, H., & Rees, K. (2010). Stakeholder forces of socially responsible supply chain management orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 305–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peloza, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility as reputation insurance. Working paper, Center for Responsible Business, UC Berkeley, CA.

  • Peloza, J. (2006). Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. California Management Review, 48(2), 52–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfau, M., Haigh, M. M., Sims, J., & Wigley, S. (2008). The influence of corporate social responsibility campaigns on public opinion. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(2), 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reputation Institute. (2015). The Global RepTrak®100: The world’s most reputable companies (2015). RI report on consumer perceptions of companies in 15 countries. Retrieved March 30, 2016, from https://www.reputationinstitute.com/CMSPages/GetAzureFile.aspx?path=~\media\media\documents\2015-rt100-release-report_1.pdf&hash=3b3228f58538a41817e42e2c460328edbbd716c2bc0391a881d58b6da385934e&%20ext=.pdf.

  • Reuber, A. R., & Fischer, E. (2010). Organizations behaving badly: When are discreditable actions likely to damage organizational reputation? Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, M., & Haunschild, P. R. (2006). The liability of good reputation: A study of product recalls in the US automobile industry. Organization Science, 17(1), 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richetin, J., Conner, M., & Perugini, M. (2011). Not doing is not the opposite of doing: Implications for attitudinal models of behavioral prediction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(1), 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077–1093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, M. S., Sauer, S. J., & Proell, C. A. (2013). The lion’s share: The impact of credit expectations and credit allocations on commitment to leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 80–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, P. (2005). Don’t obsess about CR and governance—Corporate culture is what counts. Corporate Responsibility Management, 2(1), 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (2013). Just business: Multinational corporations and human rights. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Pollach, I. (2005). The perils and opportunities of communicating corporate ethics. Journal of Marketing Management, 21(3–4), 267–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidpeter, R., Lu, H., Stehr, C., & Huang, H. (Eds.). (2015). Sustainable development and CSR in China. A multi-perspective approach. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2008). Integrating and unifying competing and complementary frameworks: The search for a common core in the business and society field. Business and Society, 47(2), 148–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siltaoja, M. E. (2006). Value priorities as combining core factors between CSR and reputation—A qualitative study. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), 91–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R., & Brinkmann, J. (2003). Enron ethics (or: culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 243–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjovall, A. M., & Talk, A. C. (2004). From actions to impressions: Cognitive attribution theory and the formation of corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 7(3), 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (2015). The problem with those who cheat. Retrieved March 30, 2016, from http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/32689e6c-6c3e-11e5-8171-ba1968cf791a.html#axzz3sLRNke4k.

  • Sohn, Y. J., & Lariscy, R. W. (2015). A “buffer” or “boomerang?”—The role of corporate reputation in bad times. Communication Research, 42(2), 237–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soppe, A., Schauten, M., Soppe, J., & Kaymak, U. (2011). Corporate social responsibility reputation (CSRR): Do companies comply with their raised CSR expectations? Corporate Reputation Review, 14(4), 300–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, S. (2010). BP’s sustainability lesson. Retrieved March 30, 2016, from http://www.forbes.com/2010/07/07/sustainability-gulf-spill-technology-bp.html.

  • Spiess, S.-O., Mueller, K., & Lin-Hi, N. (2013). Psychological foundations of corporate social responsibility: The importance of “avoiding bad”. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6(4), 383–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanaland, A. J., Lwin, M. O., & Murphy, P. E. (2011). Consumer perceptions of the antecedents and consequences of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strike, V. M., Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2006). Being good while being bad: Social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 850–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L., & Melewar, T. C. (2005). Corporate reputation and crisis management: The threat and manageability of anti-corporatism. Corporate Reputation Review, 7(4), 377–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L. L., & McLean Parks, J. (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 215–285). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhamme, J., Swaen, V., Berens, G., & Janssen, C. (2015). Playing with fire: Aggravating and buffering effects of ex ante CSR communication campaigns for companies facing allegations of social irresponsibility. Marketing Letters, 26(4), 565–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. (2000). The multiple bottom lines of corporate citizenship: Social investing, reputation, and responsibility audits. Business and Society Review, 105(3), 323–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, T., Lutz, R. J., & Weitz, B. A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K. (2010). A systematic review of the corporate reputation literature: Definition, measurement, and theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(4), 357–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, G., Mitchell, V. W., Jackson, P. R., & Beatty, S. E. (2009). Examining the antecedents and consequences of corporate reputation: A customer perspective. British Journal of Management, 20(2), 187–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartick, S. L. (1992). The relationship between intense media exposure and change in corporate reputation. Business and Society, 31(1), 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B., & Jackson, D. D. (2011 [1967]). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

  • Weiner, B. (1980). Human motivation. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigley, S., & Pfau, M. (2010). Communicating before a crisis: An exploration of bolstering, CSR, and inoculation practices. In W. T. Coombs & S. J. Holladay (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp. 568–590). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. J., & Barrett, J. D. (2000). Corporate philanthropy, criminal activity, and firm reputation: Is there a link? Journal of Business Ethics, 26(4), 341–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 50–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. (2014). The antecedents of corporate social and environmental irresponsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(5), 286–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, Y., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 377–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavyalova, A., Pfarrer, M. D., Reger, R. K., & Shapiro, D. L. (2012). Managing the message: The effects of firm actions and industry spillovers on media coverage following wrongdoing. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1079–1101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou, H. L., Zeng, R. C., Zeng, S. X., & Shi, J. J. (2015). How do environmental violation events harm corporate reputation? Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 836–854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zyglidopoulos, S. C. (2003). The issue life-cycle: Implications for reputation for social performance and organizational legitimacy. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(1), 70–81.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Vechta, Driverstr. 22, 49377, Vechta, Germany

    Nick Lin-Hi & Igor Blumberg

Authors
  1. Nick Lin-Hi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Igor Blumberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Lin-Hi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin-Hi, N., Blumberg, I. The Link Between (Not) Practicing CSR and Corporate Reputation: Psychological Foundations and Managerial Implications. J Bus Ethics 150, 185–198 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3164-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3164-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation