Abstract
Action research is combined research and practical action where the researcher joins with and acts with practitioners to help improve practice and theory building. Action research can be a form of Aristotelian critical, ethical praxis that developmentally changes the action researcher and the external world. Bernstein’s (Praxis and action, 1971) and Eikeland’s (The ways of Aristotle, 2008) interpretations of Aristotelian ethics praxis are considered. The Argyris et al. (Action science: concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention, 1985) “action-science” and the van de Ven (Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and research knowledge, 2007) “engaged scholarship” forms of action research with their differently nuanced interpretations of Aristotelian philosophy as foundations for action research are considered and compared as examples of action research as an ethics praxis method with respect to (1) a key similarity with respect to joining of critical ethics and actionable knowledge; (2) another key similarity with respect to action research practice that can developmentally change the action researcher and the external world; and (3) a key difference with respect to academic literature versus practitioner-based theory building is also considered (Nielsen J Bus Ethics 93:401–406, 2010a). Examples in the cases of the political economist and action researcher, Hirschmann’s “Exit,Voice, Loyalty” approach and Greenleaf’s “Servant Leadership” approach to action research as forms of Aristotelian critical, ethical praxis are analyzed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyris, C. (1957). personality and organization: The conflict between system and the individual. New York: Harper and Row.
Argyris, C. (1964). Integrating the individual and the organization. New York: Wiley.
Argyris, C. (1986). Skilled incompetence. Harvard Business Review, 64(6), 1–7.
Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Argyris, C. (2003). A life full of learning. Organization Studies, 24(7), 1178–1192.
Argyris, C. (2004). Reasons and rationalizations: The limits to organizational knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. L. (1985). Action Science: Concepts, Methods, and Skills for Research and Intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Aristotle, (1981). The ethics of Aristotle. The Nicomachean ethics. New York: Penguin Books.
Bernstein, R. J. (1971). Praxis and action. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Bernstein, R. J. (1976). The restructuring of social and political theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities at the professorate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Christensen, L. J., Mackey, A., & Whetten, D. (2014). Taking responsibilityfor corporate social responsibility: The role of leaders in creating, implementing, sustaining, or avoiding socially responsible firm behaviors. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(2), 164–178.
Eikeland, O. (2008). The ways of Aristotle. Bern: Peter Lang, International Academic Publishers.
Evered, R., & Louis, M. (1981). Alternative perspective to organizational science: “Inquiry from the Inside” and “inquiry from outside”. Academy of Management Review, 6, 385–395.
Frick, D. M. & Spears, L. (Eds.). 1996. On Becoming a Servant Leader. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership. New York: Paulist.
Hill, S. (2010). Europe's promise. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The strategy of economic development. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hirschman, A. O. (1995). A propensity to self-subversion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hirschman, A. O. (1998). Crossing boundaries: Selected writings. New York: Zone Books.
Lobkowicz, N. (1967). Theory and practice: History of a concept from Aristotle to Marx. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
MacIntyre, A. 1981. After virtue. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press (2nd ed. published in 1984).
Mohrman, S. A., Gibson, C. B., & Mohrman, A. M. (2001). Doing research that is useful to practice: A model and empirical exploration. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 357–375.
Moore, G., & Beadle, R. (2006). In search of organisational virtue in business: Agents, practices, institutions and environments. Organization Studies, 27(3), 369–390.
Nielsen, R. P. (1993). Organizational ethics from a perspective of action (praxis). Business Ethics Quarterly, 3(2), 131–151.
Nielsen, R. P. (1996). The politics of ethics: Methods for acting, learning, and sometimes fighting, with others in addressing ethics problems in organizational life., The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics New York: Oxford University Press.
Nielsen, R. P. (1998). Quaker foundations for Greenleaf’s servant leadership and friendly disentangling method. In L. Spears (Ed.), Insights on leadership: Service, stewardship, spirit, and servant-leadership. New York: Wiley.
Nielsen, R. P. (2003). Organization theory and ethics: Varieties and dynamics of constrained optimization. In H. Tsoukas & C. Knudsen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organization theory: Meta-theoretical perspectives (pp. 476–501). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nielsen, R. P. (2006). Introduction to the special issue. In search of organizational virtue: Moral agency in organizations. Organization Studies, 27(3), 317–322.
Nielsen, R. P. (2010a). Practitioner-based theory building in organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(3), 401–406.
Nielsen, R. P. (2010b). High-leverage finance capitalism, the economic crisis, structurally related ethics issues, and potential reforms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2), 299–330.
Nielsen, R. P., & Massa, F. G. 2013. Reintegrating ethics and institutional theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1), 135–147.
Posner, R. A. (2009). A failure of capitalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Said, E. W. (2003). Humanism and democratic criticism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Schon, D. A. (1982). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Solomon, R. C. (2004). Aristotle, ethics and business organizations. Organization Studies, 25(6), 1021–1043.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2010). Freefall: America, free markets, and the sinking of the world economy. New York: Norton.
Tsoukas, H. (1994). Refining common sense: Types of knowledge in management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 31(1), 761–780.
Tsoukas, H. (2005). Complex knowledge: Studies in organizational epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tsoukas, H., & Cummings, S. (1997). Marginalization and recovery: The emergence of Aristotelian themes in organization studies. Organization Studies, 18(4), 655–683.
van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and research knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
van de Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31, 802–821.
Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Whyte, W. G. (1984). Learning from the field: A guide from experience. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nielsen, R.P. Action Research As an Ethics Praxis Method. J Bus Ethics 135, 419–428 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2482-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2482-3