Abstract
We argue that the gap between an authentically ethical conviction of sustainability and a behaviour that avoids confronting the terrifying reality of its ethical point of reference is characteristic of the field of business sustainability. We do not accuse the field of business sustainability of ethical shortcomings on the account of this attitude–behaviour gap. If anything, we claim the opposite, namely that there resides an ethical sincerity in the convictions of business scholars to entrust capitalism and capitalists with the mammoth task of reversing, the terrifying reality of ecological devastation. Yet, the very illusory nature of this belief in capitalism’s captains to save us from the environmentally devastating effects of capitalism gives this ethical stance a tragic beauty. While sincere and authentic, it nevertheless is an ethical stance that relies on an “exclusionary gesture of refusing to see” (Žižek, in Violence, 2008, p. 52), what in psychoanalysis is referred to as a fetishist disavowal of reality. We submit that this disavowal is fetishistic because the act is not simply one of repressing the real. If it was, we would rightly expect that we could all see the truth if we only provide more or better information to fill the subject’s lack of knowledge. The problem is that the fetishist transfers a fantasy of the real as the real. In the case of destructive capitalism, the fetishist disavows that particular reality by believing in another, thus subjectively negating the lack (or gap). Therefore, from the perspective of psychoanalytic theory, we submit that the gap between attitude and behaviour is best understood not only as an ethical flaw, but also as an essential component of an ethics that makes possible the field of business sustainability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See for example United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs’ reports such as this one entitled: Innovation for Sustainable Development: Local Case Studies from Africa or consult the “knowledge center” of the Network of Business Sustainability website, hosted by Richard Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario, where reports are available such as one entitled Innovating for Sustainability, which is brimming with case studies of companies that address each in their own way some environmental issue.
There are truly too many too list, from the World Bank to the IMF to NASA to the Koch-Brothers funded “Berkley Earth” study and many more. Worth singling out, perhaps, is a 2011 International Energy Agency report that as Harvey (2011) points out showed 2010 as the worst year for greenhouse gas emissions yet, despite recession and despite all that well-intentioned effort by companies to reduce their carbon footprint. The agency has concluded that the 2° Celsius target for global warming, which is the upper limit of warming considered safe for the planet, will almost certainly be unachievable unless massive changes are made immediately to our economic and energy systems. In the face of such overwhelming evidence that the current economico-political system has failed utterly to contain let alone reverse Co2 output and halt global warming, it is hard to imagine that capital’s ongoing and future sustainability efforts will do just that.
Indeed Melancholia was so often suggested to us as a more appropriate film for analysis by reviewers and seminar audiences that an explicit response is required. Notwithstanding the above justification for maintaining a focus on ‘banal’ blockbusters, we also remain unconvinced that Melancholia really does posit a more credible alternative. For example we note that Guardian critic Peter Bradshaw described the film as “entirely ridiculous, often quite boring, with a script showing worrying signs of being cobbled together” and synopsises the film as follows, “A big CGI planet is threatening to wipe out the world—if only it would hurry up and end Lars von Trier's clunky, tiresome film” (Bradshaw 2011). Meanwhile Observer critic Philip French writes: “the movie is heavy, though without weight or gravitas — a solipsistic, narcissistic, inhuman affair” (French 2011). All things considered, we prefer the honesty of our blockbusters.
References
Adorno, T. W. (1994). The stars down to earth and other essays on the irrational in culture. London and New York: Routledge.
Böhm, S., & Batta, A. (2010). Just doing it: Enjoying commodity fetishism with Lacan. Organization, 17(3), 345–361.
Bradshaw, P. (2011). Review: Melancholia, The Guardian. Retrieved March 2023, 2013 from http://www.theguardian.com/film/2011/sep/2029/melancholia-film-review.
Brand, U., & Thimmel, S. (2012). Schöne Grüne Welt. Über die Mythen der Green Economy LuXemburg argumente (Vol. 3). Berlin: Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung
Canniford, R., & Shankar, A. (2013). Purifying practices: How consumers assemble romantic experiences of nature. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 1051.
Carpentier, N., & Spinoy, E. (2008). Discourse theory and cultural analysis: Media, arts and literature. Cresskill, N.J.: Hampton Press.
Cederstrom, C. & Fleming, P. (2012). Dead man working. London: Zero Books.
Chomsky, N. (2011, December 2006). Marching off the Cliff, Truthout. Retrieved December 27, 2012 from http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/5428:marching-off-the-cliff.
Cluley, R., & Dunne, S. (2012). From commodity fetishism to commodity narcissism. Marketing Theory, 12(3), 251–265.
Cohn, N. (1993). The pursuit of the millennium: Revolutionary millenarians and mystical anarchists of the Middle Ages. London: Pimlico.
Desmond, J. (2012). Psychoanalytic accounts of consuming desire: Hearts of darkness. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Devinney, T. M., Auger, P., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2010). The myth of the ethical consumer. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fleming, P., & Jones, M. T. (2012). The end of corporate social responsibility: Crisis and critique. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
French, P. (2011). Review: Melancholia. The Guardian. Retrieved March 2023, 2013 from http://www.theguardian.com/film/2011/oct/2002/melancholia-lars-von-trier-review.
Freud, S. (1995). The Freud reader. New York: W.W. Norton.
Frosh, S. (2010). Psychoanalysis outside the clinic: Interventions in psychosocial studies. Basingstoke, Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fuss, D. (1995). Identification papers. New York: Routledge.
Gellner, E. (1995). Anthropology and politics: Revolutions in the sacred groove. Oxford: Wiley.
Glover, E. (1933). War, sadism and pacifism. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Gupta, S., & Ogden, D. T. (2006). The attitude–behavior gap in environmental consumerism. Paper presented at the APUBEF.
Harvey, D. (2010). The enigma of capital: And the crises of capitalism. London: Profile.
Harvey, F. (2011, May 29). Worst ever carbon emissions leave climate on the brink, The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/may/2029/carbon-emissions-nuclearpower.
Holbrook, M., & Hirschman, E. (1993). The semiotics of consumption: Interpreting symbolic consumer behavior in popular culture and works of art. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jameson, F. (2003). Future city. New Left Review, 21(May/June), 65–79.
Jay, L. (1990). Green about the tills: Markets discover the eco-consumer. Management Review, 79(6), 24–28.
Jones, C., & Spicer, A. (2005). The sublime object of entrepreneurship. Organization, 12(2), 223–246.
Krystallis, A., Grunert, K. G., de Barcellos, M. D., Perrea, T., & Verbeke, W. (2012). Consumer attitudes towards sustainability aspects of food production: Insights from three continents. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3–4), 334–372.
Laplanche, J., & Pontalis, J.-B. (2006). The language of psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.
Mackey, J., & Sisodia, R. (2013). Conscious capitalism: Liberating the heroic spirit of business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
Mainieri, T., Barnett, E. G., Valdero, T. R., Unipan, J. B., & Oskamp, S. (1997). Green buying: The influence of environmental concern on consumer behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(2), 189–204.
Marcuse, H. (1969). Eros and civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud. London: Sphere.
McDonagh, P. (1998). Towards a theory of sustainable communication in risk society: Relating issues of sustainability to marketing communications. Journal of Marketing Management, 14(6), 591–622.
Megicks, P., Memery, J., & Angell, R. J. (2012). Understanding local food shopping: Unpacking the ethical dimension. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3–4), 264–289.
Miller, D. (2012). Consumption and its consequences. Polity: Cambridge.
Osterhus, T. L. (1997). Pro-social consumer influence strategies: When and how do they work? Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 16–29.
Polonsky, M. J., Vocino, A., Grau, S. L., Garma, R., & Ferdous, A. S. (2012). The impact of general and carbon-related environmental knowledge on attitudes and behaviour of US consumers. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3–4), 238–263.
Segal, H. (1987). Silence is the real crime. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 14, 3–12.
Smith, R. (2011). Green capitalism: the god that failed. real-world economics review, 56, http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue56/Smith56.pdf.
Tanner, C., & Kast, S. W. (2003). Promoting sustainable consumption: determinant of green purchases by Swiss consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 20(10), 883–902.
Taylor, P. A. (2010). Žižek and the media. Polity: Malden, MA.
Wessels, T. (2006). The myth of progress: Toward a sustainable future. Burlington, Vt.: University of Vermont Press.
Woźniak, A. (2010). The dream that caused reality: The place of the Lacanian subject of science in the field of organization theory. Organization, 17(3), 395–411.
Žižek, S. (1989a). Looking Awry, 50(Autumn), 30–55.
Žižek, S. (1989b). The sublime object of ideology. London and New York: Verso.
Žižek, S. (1992). Everything you always wanted to know about Lacan but were afraid to ask Hitchcock. London and New York: Verso.
Žižek, S. (2002). Welcome to the desert of the real!: Five essays on September 11 and related dates. London and New York: Verso.
Žižek, S. (2006a). How to read Lacan. Granta: London.
Žižek, S. (2006b). The parallax view. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Žižek, S. (2008). Violence. London: Profile Books.
Žižek, S. (2009). First as tragedy, then as farce. London: Verso.
Žižek, S. (2010a). Joe Public v The Volcano. New Statesman. Retrieved from http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2010/2005/essay-nature-catastrophe.
Žižek, S. (2010b). Living in the end times. London: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bradshaw, A., Zwick, D. The Field of Business Sustainability and the Death Drive: A Radical Intervention. J Bus Ethics 136, 267–279 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2443-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2443-x