Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility in International Business: Illustrations from Korean and Japanese Electronics MNEs in Indonesia

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Employing Porter and Kramer’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) framework (Harv Bus Rev 84:78–92, 2006), we explored the strategic CSR programs of two Korean and two Japanese electronics multinational enterprises (MNEs) in Indonesia. We observed that the sample MNEs engage in strategic CSR either through investment in competitive context or the transformation of value chain activities. In addition, these firms strongly favor strategic CSR over responsive CSR, not just because of the economic benefits offered by the former, but also its advantages in managing the programs and communicating with stakeholders. Furthermore, they have developed varied organizational methods and tend to manage their key CSR programs centrally to effectively link them to the competitive strategy. Lastly, the results of our analysis suggest that Korean MNEs have customized their strategic CSR programs for emerging countries more actively than Japanese MNEs. In sum, our analysis elucidates several important features of strategic CSR employed by the MNEs in emerging countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahamad, K. (2003). The challenge of global capitalism: An Islamic perspective. In J. H. Duning (Ed.). Making globalization good: The moral challenge of global capitalism (pp. 181–209). New York, Oxford University Press.

  • Asongu, J. (2007). Innovation as an argument for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Public Policy, 1(3), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (2001). Is the resource-based theory a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10, 7–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrientos, S., Dolan, C., & Tallontire, A. (2003). A gendered value chain approach to codes of conduct in African horticulture. World Development, 31(9), 1511–1526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, J., & Morrison, A. (2010). A cautionary tale for emerging market giants. Harvard Business Review September, pp. 99–105.

  • Blowfield, M. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Reinventing the meaning of development? International Affairs, 81(3), 515–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branco, M., & Rodrigues, L. (2006). Communication of corporate social responsibility by Portuguese banks: A legitimacy theory perspective. Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 11(3), 232–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L., & Logsdon, J. (1996). How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 495–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J., Eden, L., & Miller, S. (2012). Multinational and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter? Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 84–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. (1987). In search of the moral manager. Business Horizons March–April, 7–15.

  • Carroll, A. (1999). Corporate social responsibility-evolution of a definitional construct. Business Society, 38(3), 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. (2004). Managing ethically with global stakeholders: A present and future challenge. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 114–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A., & Hoy, F. (1984). Integrating corporate social policy into strategic management. Journal of Business Strategy, 4(3), 48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapra, M. (1992). Islam and the economic challenge. Leicester: The Islamic foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cretu, A., & Brodie, R. (2007). The influence of brand image and company reputation where manufactures market to small firms: A customer value perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 230–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, D., & Lewis, S. (2003). CSR in stakeholder expectations: And their implication for company strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bakker, F., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business Society, 44(3), 283–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociology Review, 48, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egri, C., & Ralston, D. (2008). Corporate responsibility: A review of international management research from 1998 to 2007. Journal of International Management, 14(4), 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firman, H., & Tola, B. (2008). The future of schooling in Indonesia. Journal of International Corporation in Education, 11(1), 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogler, H., & Nutt, F. (1975). A note on social responsibility and stock valuation. Academy of Management Journal, 18(1), 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. (1994). From CSR1 to CSR2—The maturing of business—And society thought. Business and Society, 33(2), 150–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, F., & Hock, R. (1976). Who claims corporate responsibility? The biggest and the worst. Business and Society Review, 18, 62–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbreath, J. (2009). Building corporate social responsibility into strategy. European Business Review, 21(2), 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardberg, N., & Fombrun, C. (2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, B., Kestler, A., & Anand, S. (2010). Building local legitimacy into corporate social responsibility: Gold mining firms in developing nations. Journal of World business, 45(3), 304–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosser, K., & Moon, J. (2005). Gender mainstreaming and corporate social responsibility: Reporting workplace issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(4), 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gugler, P., & Shi, J. (2009). Corporate social responsibility for developing country multinational corporations: Lost war in pertaining global competitiveness? Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. (1998). Rethinking age dependence in organizational mortality: Logical formalizations. American Journal of Sociology, 47, 126–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience—A research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 91–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A., & Keim, G. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B., & Allen, D. (2007). Strategic corporate social responsibility and value creation among large firms: Lessons from the Spanish experience. Long Range Planning, 40(6), 594–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. (1976). The international operations of national firms: A study of foreign direct investment. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwu-Egwuonwu, R. (2011). Corporate reputation & firm performance: Empirical literature evidence. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(4), 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, I., & Nelson, J. (2004). Profits with principles: Seven strategies for delivering value with values. New York: Random House LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D. (2010). The CSR of MNC subsidiaries in developing countries: Global, local, substantive or diluted? Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D., & Mirshak, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeremy, G. (2009). Building corporate social responsibility into strategy. European Business Review, 21(2), 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koestoer, Y. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in Indonesia. Paper presented at the seminar on good corporate and social governance in promoting ASEAN’s regional integration, 17 January 2007, Jakarta, Indonesia.

  • Kolk, A. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in the coffee sector: The dynamics of MNC responses and code development. European Management Journal, 23(2), 228–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., & Van Tulder, R. (2010). International business, corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. International Business Review, 19(2), 119–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24, 64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Stiawan, I. (2010). Marketing 3.0: From products to costumers to the human spirit. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.

  • Kujala, J., & Sajasalo, P. (2009). Reforming the integration-responsiveness framework: A business ethics perspective. Journal of International Business Ethics, 2(1), 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsov, A., Kuznetsova, O., & Warren, R. (2009). CSR and the legitimacy of business in transition economies: The case of Russia. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25, 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantos, G. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of consumer marketing, 18(7), 595–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, C., & Zhexembayeva, N. (2011). Embedded sustainability: The next big competitive advantage. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (2007). Corporate social responsiveness in the Korean electronics industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(4), 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Kim, J. (2009). Current status of CSR in the realm of supply management: The case of the Korean electronics industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 138–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, L., & Fryxell, G. (1988). An empirical study of the predictors of corporate social performance: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 951–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logsdon, J., & Wood, D. (2002). Business citizenship: From domestic to global level of analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2).

  • Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33, 497–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2011). Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate social responsibility, resource based theory and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1480–1495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, P. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, A. (2006). Global versus local CSR strategies. European Management Journal, 24(2–3), 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, G., & O’Dwyer, B. (2004). Motivating socially responsive decision making: The operation of management controls in a socially responsive organization. The British Accounting Review, 36(2), 173–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pananond, P., & Zeithaml, C. (1998). The international expansion process of MNEs from developing countries: A case study of Thailand’s CP group. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 15(2), 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, P. (2009). Locusts, fish, bionic bones-car engineers look to nature. Auto Week, 59(5), 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perren, L., & Ram, M. (2004). Case study method in small business and entrepreneurial research: Mapping boundaries and perspectives. International Small Business Journal, 22(1), 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, M., & Jevons, C. (2009). Global branding and strategic CSR: An overview of three types of complexity. International Marketing Review, 26(3), 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance.

  • Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy and society—The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quester, P., & Thompson, B. (2001). Advertising and promotion leverage on arts sponsorship effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(1), 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiia, D., Carroll, A., & Buchholtz, A. (2003). Philanthropy as strategy: When corporate charity “Begins at Home”. Business Society, 42(2), 169–201.

  • Scott, R., & Meyer, J. (1991). The organization of societal sectors. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), New institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, T. (2012). Steve jobs and apple. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group.

  • Spencer, J., & Gomez, C. (2011). MNEs and corruption: The impact of national institutions and subsidiary strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 28–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G. (1980). An overview of the changing business environment and its impact on business. In L. E. Preston (Ed.), Business environment/public policy: 1979 conference papers (pp. 3–18). St Louis, MO: AACSB.

  • Suryadarma, D., Widyanti, W., Suryahadi, A., & Sumarto, S. (2006). From access to income: Regional and ethnic inequality in Indonesia. Jakarta: SMERU Research Institute.

  • Thamrin, S. (2011). Indonesia’s national mitigation actions: Paving the way towards NAMAs. Discussion document, prepared for the CCXG/Global forum on environment, seminar on MRV and carbon markets, 28–29 March 2011, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/env/cc/48304156.pdf.

  • Votaw, D. (1973). Genius becomes rare. In D. Votaw & S. P. Sethi (Eds.), The corporate dilemma. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waagstein, P. (2011). The mandatory corporate social responsibility in Indonesia: Problems and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 455–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S., & Smith, N. (2000). Relationships: The real challenge of corporate global citizenship. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G., Treviño, L., & Cochran, P. (1999). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 539–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.

  • Werther, W., & Chandler, J. (2010). Strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders in a global environment. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 50–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., & Ferris, S. (1997). Agency conflict and corporate strategy: The effect of divestment on corporate value. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S., & Mosakowski, E. (1997). The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in Financial services. Strategic Management Journal, 18(6), 439–464.

Reports and Other Sources

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank area editor and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. We also appreciate the financial support from the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant (NRF-2012-S1A3A2-2012S1A3A2033412).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Haub School of Business, Saint Joseph’s University, 5600 City Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Sangcheol Song

  2. School of Business, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-749, Korea

    Young-Ryeol Park, Soonkyoo Choe & Youjin Baik

Authors
  1. Young-Ryeol Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sangcheol Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Soonkyoo Choe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Youjin Baik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sangcheol Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, YR., Song, S., Choe, S. et al. Corporate Social Responsibility in International Business: Illustrations from Korean and Japanese Electronics MNEs in Indonesia. J Bus Ethics 129, 747–761 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2212-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2212-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation