Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Business Research Ethics: Participant Observer Perspectives

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ethical parameters of business research, especially that undertaken by doctoral candidates, are an under researched area. This exploratory research analyses research ethics in the business and management contexts as espoused in perceived low risk ethics applications from business doctoral candidates in light of the principles of Australian research ethics guidelines. Applications are also analysed in terms of power relationships, methods of access and informed consent, pressure to complete research expeditiously, conflict of interest and cross-cultural understandings. Findings suggest that research design, personal relationships with participants and nuanced understandings of the contextual dimensions of risk may be of concern in the proposed research. However, a reflexive process also questions the cultural and other assumptions of both researchers and ethics administrators underlying these concerns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvesson, M., Hardy, C., & Harley, B. (2008). Reflecting on reflexivity: Reflexive textual practices in organization and management theory. Journal of Management Studies, 45(3), 480–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association of University Professors. (2000). Protecting Human Beings: Institutional review boards and social science research in Guillemin, M. and Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity and “Ethically Important Moments” research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 248–261). London: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, G., & Demetriades, J. (2007). Feminist research methodologies and development: Overview and practical application. Gender and Development, 15(2), 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, E., & Bryman, A. (2007). The ethics of management research: An exploratory content analysis. British Journal of Management, 18, 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). In J. Thompson (Ed.), Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1996). The state nobility—Elite schools in the field of power (L. C. Clough, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

  • Brewis, J., & Wray-Bliss, E. (2008). Re-searching ethics: Towards a more reflexive Critical Management Studies. Organization Studies, 29(12), 1521–1540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (1998). Critically reflective practice. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Profession, 18, 197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, A. J., Smye, V. L., & Varcoe, C. (2005). The relevance of postcolonial theoretical perspectives to research on modern health. CJNR, 37(4), 16–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. (2010). Asia as method: Toward deimperialization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, N. A. (1992). Ethics are Local: Engaging cross-cultural variation in the ethics for clinical research. Social Science Medicine, 35(9), 1079–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H., & Wray-Bliss, E. (2005). Discriminating ethics. Human Relations, 58(6), 799–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe, A. (2003). Reflexive inquiry in organizational research: Questions and possibilities. Human Relations, 56(8), 983–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. V. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekberg, M. (2012). Reassessing the role of the biomedical research ethics committee. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10, 335–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality’, trans. Rosi Braidotti and revised by Colin Gordon. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frechtling, D., & Boo, S. (2012). On the ethics of management research: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear-Smith, F., Lobb, B., Davies, G., Nachson, I., & Seelau, S. (2002). International variation in ethics committee requirements: Comparisons across five Westernised nations. BMC Medical Ethics, 3(2). Retrieved January 18, 2013, from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/3/2.

  • Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity and “Ethically Important Moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guta, A., Nixon, S. A., & Wilson, M. G. (2013). Resisting the seduction of “ethics creep”: Using Foucault to surface complexity and contradiction in research ethics review. Social Science and Medicine, 98, 301–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty, K. D. (2004). Ethics creep: Governing social science in the name of ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 391–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, A., & Opondo, M. (2005). Harmonising the cut flower chain: Confronting the realities of flower production for workers in Kenya. Antipode, 37(2), 302–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1992). After the neutrality ideal: Science politics and ‘Strong Objectivity’. Social Research, 59(3), 567–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimer, C. A. (2012). Wicked ethics: Compliance work and the practice of ethics in HIV. Social Science and Medicine, 1, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoare, J. (2007). Editorial. Gender and Development, 15(2), 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyder, A. A., Wali, S. A., Khan, N. B., Kass, N. E., & Dawson, L. (2004). Ethical review of health research: A perspective form developing country researchers. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jentsch, B., & Pilley, C. (2003). Research relationships between the South and the North: Cinderella and the ugly sisters? Social Science and Medicine, 57, 1957–1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakabadse, N., Kakabadse, A., & Kouzmin, A. (2002). Ethical considerations in management research: A ‘Truth’ seeker’s guide. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 15(2), 105–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kite, J., Russo, S., Couch, P., & Bell, L. (2012). The honours year. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(1), 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorf, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to the methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T., & Boulton, M. (2007). Changing constructions of informed consent: Qualitative research and complex social worlds. Social Science and Medicine, 65, 2199–2211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). (2007). National statement on ethical conduct of research involving humans, Australian Government. Retrieved May 10, 2012, from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/publications/e35.

  • National Institute of Health. (2012). Nuremberg Code. Retrieved May 10, 2012, from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html.

  • Oakley, A. (2000). Experiments in knowing; gender and method in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papoutsaki, E. (2006). De-westernising research methodologies: Alternative approaches to research for higher education curricula in developing countries. Paper presented at the global colloquium of the UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge, Paris.

  • Park, J. (2011). Metamorphosis of Confucian Heritage Culture and the possibility of an Asian education research methodology. Comparative Education, 47(3), 381–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakowski, C. A. (1993). The ugly scholar: Neocolonialism and ethical issues in international research. The American Sociologist, 24(3–4), 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner, how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stening, B. W., & Skubik, D. W. (2007). Do international management researchers need a code of ethics? Management International Review, 47(1), 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, L., & Saunders, S. B. (2002). The socio-cultural embeddedness of individuals’ ethical reasoning in organizations (cross-cultural ethics). Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Medical Association. (1964). Declaration of Helsinki. Retrieved May 10, 2012, from http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/widerselectionofapplicationsfromotheruniversities.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Southern Cross Business School, Southern Cross University, Locked Mail Bag 4, Coolangatta, QLD, 4225, Australia

    Michelle Wallace & Neroli Sheldon

Authors
  1. Michelle Wallace
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Neroli Sheldon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Wallace.

Additional information

Ethics Approval Number ECN-12-110.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallace, M., Sheldon, N. Business Research Ethics: Participant Observer Perspectives. J Bus Ethics 128, 267–277 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2102-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2102-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation