Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing the Evolution of CSR Reporting to that of Financial Reporting

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper compares between the evolution of financial reporting and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting. Our comparison follows a framework of seven factors for exploring comparative accounting history put forth by Carnegie and Napier (Account Audit Account J 15(5):689–718, 2002): Period, Places, People, Practices, Propagation, Products, and Profession. Using this framework allows for a comparison of similarities and differences as to how both types of reporting have evolved. Some of the defining moments in the evolution of financial reporting have yet to take place in the development of CSR reporting; such as an event that legitimizes a CSR reporting standard or gives CSR reporting global recognition. The evolutionary process may not follow the same path as financial reporting did due to the varying stakeholders involved. However, there are enough similarities that still make the evolution of financial reporting a useful comparative tool to analyze the potential growth and development of CSR reporting. Financial reporting has evolved into a comparable and reliable market-based resource over the last 100 years. Relative to this timeline CSR reporting is still in its infancy. CSR reporting has come a long way since early reports were first issued, but there remain many deficiencies in comparability, consistency, reliability, and relevance. The results of this comparison provide some insight on the possible future development of CSR reporting. Our goal is that this paper contributes to an understanding of CSR reporting’s past and provides insights into CSR reporting’s present and future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaronson, S. (2007). A match made in the corporate and public interest: Marrying voluntary CSR initiatives and the WTO. Journal of World Trade, 41, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • AccountAbility. (2012). AccountAbility website. Retrieved April 20, 2012, from http://www.accountability.org/.

  • Adam, A. M., & Shavit, T. (2008). How Can a Ratings-based Method for Assessing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Provide an Incentive to Firms Excluded from Socially Responsible Investment Indices to Invest in CSR? Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 899–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agami, A., & Cascini, K. (1995). NAFTA and harmonization of accounting. Multinational Business Review, 3, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araya, M. (Spring, 2006). Exploring terra incognita: Non-financial reporting in corporate Latin America. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21, 25–39.

  • Article 22 (2012). How France’s new sustainability reporting law impacts US companies. Retrieved December 1, 2012, from Ernst & Young. http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Frances_sustainability_law_to_impact_US_companies/$FILE/How_Frances_new_sustainability_reporting_law.pdf.

  • Barbu, E., & Baker, R. (2010). A Historical and Neo-Institutional Analysis of Institutions Involved in International Accounting Convergence. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 9(2), 218–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blacconiere, W., & Patten, D. (1994). Environmental disclosures, regulatory costs, and changes in firm value. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18, 357–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broad, S. J. (1949). The development of accounting standards to meet changing economic conditions. Journal of Accountancy (pre-1986), 87(5), 378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhmann, K. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: What role for law? Some aspects of law and CSR. Corporate Governance, 2, 188–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie, G. D., & Napier, C. J. (2002). Exploring Comparative International Accounting History. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(5), 689–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christian Aid. (2004). Behind the mask: The real face of corporate social responsibility. Retrieved December 1, 2012, from http://www.christian-aid.org.uk/indepth/0401csr/index.htm.

  • CRRA. (2012). The CR reporting awards—2012 global winners & reporting trends. CorporateRegister.com publication.

  • Diez, C. (2011). Nike’s corporate social responsibility: The sweatshop experience. Retrieved May 12, 2013, from http://ureconstruction.wordpress.com/2011/09/11/nikes-corporate-social-responsibility-the-sweatshop-experience/.

  • Duffy, M., Flesher, D., Hayek, M., Pane, S., & Hayek, C. (2013). Shifts in corporate accountability reflected in socially responsible reporting: A historical review. Journal of Management History, 19(1), 87–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enviroreporting. (2013). Enviroreporting.com. Retrieved May 11, 2013, from http://www.enviroreporting.com/others/norway_act.pdf.

  • Fajardo, C. (2007). The Move Towards Convergence of Accounting Standards. World Wide Journal of American Academy of Business, 12(1), 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • FASB. (2009). FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ Launches Today: The Codification is now officially the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP. News Release 07/01/09. http://www.fasb.org/cs/ContentServer?pagename=FASB%2FFASBContent_C%2FNewsPage&cid=1176156318458.

  • Fonteneau, G. (October, 2003). Corporate social responsibility: Envisioning its social implications. The Jus Semper Global Alliance/The Living Wages North and South Initiative (TJSGA/TLWNSI) Essay, pp. 1–11.

  • Frost, G. F. (2007). The introduction of mandatory environmental guidelines: Australian evidence. Abacus, 43(2), 190–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2013). Retrieved December 10, 2013, from www.globalreporting.org.

  • Guggiola, G. (2010). IFRS adoption in the E.U., accounting harmonization and markets efficiency: A review1. The International Business & Economics Research Journal, 9(12), 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, P. A. (2004). The corporate social responsibility system in Latin America and the Caribbean. Policy Paper. Nicholas: Canadian Foundation for the Americas (FOCAL).

  • Hess, D. (2001). Regulating corporate social performance: A new look at social accounting, auditing, and reporting. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(2), 307–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohnen, P. (2009). OECD MNE guidelines: A responsible business choice. OECD Observer No. 270/271.

  • Hopwood, A. (1983). On Trying to Study Accounting in the Contexts in Which It Operates. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8(2), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husser, J., Jean-Marc, A., Barbat, G., & Lespinet-Najib, V. (2012). CSR and sustainable development: Are the concepts compatible? Management of Environmental Quality, 23(6), 658–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IASPlus. (2012). Use of IFRSs by jurisdiction. Retrieved April 22, 2012, from http://www.iasplus.com/en/resources/use-of-ifrs.

  • IASPlus. (2013). International financial reporting standards. Retrieved May 10, 2013, from http://www.iasplus.com/en/standards/standards/#international-financial-reporting-standards.

  • Islam, M. (2006). Compliance with Disclosure Requirements by Four SAARC Countries—Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Journal of American Academy of Business, 10(1), 349–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayasinghe, K., & Thomas, D. (2009). The preservation of indigenous accounting systems in a subaltern community. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(3), 351–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koerber, C. (2009). Corporate responsibility standards: Current implications and future possibilities for peace through commerce. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 461–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2005). KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2005. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam and KPMG Global Sustainability Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2008). KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2008. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam and KPMG Global Sustainability Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2011). KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011. Amsterdam: KPMG Global Sustainability Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, A. (2009). 20 years on from Exxon Valdez: What progress for corporate responsibility? Ethicalcorp.com. http://www.ethicalcorp.com/communications-reporting/20-years-exxon-valdez-what-progress-corporate-responsibility.

  • Maines, L., Bartov, E., Fairfield, P., & Hirst, E. (2003). Evaluating concepts-based vs. rules-based approaches to standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 17(1), 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlin, J. T., & Marlin, A. (2003). A brief history of social reporting. Business Respect, 51.

  • Morris, J., & Baddache, F. (2012). The five W’s of France’s CSR reporting law. BSR. http://www.bsr.org/reports/The_5_Ws_of_Frances_CSR_Reporting_Law_FINAL.pdf.

  • Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting Organisations and Society, 23(3), 265–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobes, C. (1991). Accounting harmonization in Europe: Towards 1992. London: A Financial Times management report.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, D. (2004). Opportunities and obstacles for corporate social responsibility reporting in developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises. Berlin: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, D. M. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 17(5), 471–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Previts, G., & Bricker, R. (1994). Fact and theory in accounting history: Presentmindedness and capital market research. Contemporary Accounting Research, 10, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Previts, G. J., & Merino, B. D. (1998). A history of accountancy in the United States: The cultural significance of accounting (2nd ed.). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prophet. (2004). Three strategies for integrating CSR with brand marketing. http://www.prophet.com/thinking/view/43-three-strategies-for-integrating-csr-with-brand-marketing.

  • Reider-Gordon, M. (2013). Understanding foreign states’ mandatory corporate social responsibility reporting. Litigation, 39(1), 61–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmandt-Besserat, D. (1983). Tokens and counting. Biblical Archeology, 46, 117–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEC 1933. (2012). Securities Act of 1933. New York: US Securities and Exchange Commission. http://www.sec.gov/about/laws/sa33.pdf.

  • SEC 1934. (2012). Securities Exchange Act of 1934. New York: US Securities and Exchange Commission. http://www.sec.gov/about/laws/sea34.pdf.

  • Tschopp, D. (2009). Assessing the viability of corporate social responsibility reporting as a governance mechanism for future trade agreements. Dissertation, SUNY at Buffalo.

  • Tschopp, D., Barney, D., & Murphy, R. (2012a). The institutional promotion of CSR reporting: Second tier institutions. The Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, 6, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschopp, D., Wells, S., & Barney, D. (2012b). The institutional promotion of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, 12.

  • UN Global Compact. (2006). UN Global Compact and Global Reporting Initiative Form Strategic Alliance. Press Release, October 6, 2006.

  • United Nations Global Compact (UNGC). (2013). Retrieved September 10, 2013, from www.unglobalcompact.org.

  • Zarb, B. (2006). The quest for transparency in financial reporting: Should international financial reporting standards replace U.S. GAAP? The CPA Journal, 1, 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeff, S. (2005). The evolution of U.S. GAAP: The political forces behind professional standards. The CPA Journal, 75, 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Saint Leo University, 33701 State Road 52, Saint Leo, FL, 33574, USA

    Daniel Tschopp

  2. State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA

    Ronald J. Huefner

Authors
  1. Daniel Tschopp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ronald J. Huefner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Tschopp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tschopp, D., Huefner, R.J. Comparing the Evolution of CSR Reporting to that of Financial Reporting. J Bus Ethics 127, 565–577 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2054-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2054-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation