Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Values and Poetic Organizations: Beyond Value Fit Toward Values Through Conversation

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the midst of greed, corruption, the economic crash and the general disillusionment of business, current conceptions of leadership, organizational values, and authenticity are being questioned. In this article, we fill a prior research gap by directly exploring the intersection of these three concepts. We begin by delving into the relationship between individual values and organizational values. This analysis reveals that the “value fit” approach to creating authenticity is limited, and also indicates that a deeper exploration of the nature of values and the role of leadership is necessary. More specifically, we propose that organizational values should be viewed as an opportunity for ongoing conversations about who we are and how we connect. Through this type of dialogue which we define as “value through conversation”, we can create what we call poetic organizations. A typology of four interconnected values each of which forms a foundation for the critical questioning and inquiry that might be found in poetic organizations is developed. We suggest that this conceptualization offers a new and dynamic approach for thinking about the relationships between leadership, values, and authenticity and has important implications for both research and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Notable exceptions include Maak and Pless’s (2006a, b) work on responsible leadership and Jackson’s (2005) article on a Sartean perspective on business ethics and how it relates to authenticity.

  2. For more on the original uses of “strong poet” see Bloom (1973, 1976, 1982). There is a secondary literature on the nature of “strong poets”. For example see Garrison (1993) and Harmeling et al. (2009).

  3. Our thanks to Henry Aldrich, Executive Coach/Human Resources at Procter and Gamble/Tremor for his discussions on this idea.

  4. http://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/company/declaration.php.

  5. http://www.kahaner.com/johnson_johnson.shtml.

  6. http://www.kahaner.com/johnson_johnson.shtml.

References

  • Abbott, A. (2001). Time matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardichvili, A., Mitchell, J., & Jondle, D. (2009). Characteristics of ethical business cultures. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 445–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auster, E., Wyle, K., & Valente, M. (2005). Strategic organizational change: Building change capabilities in your organization. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beinhocker, E. (2007). The origin of wealth: Evolution, complexity and the radical remaking of economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H. (1973). The anxiety of influence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H. (1976). Poetry and repression: Revisionism from Blake to Stevens. New Haven, CT: New Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H. (1982). Agon: Towards a theory of revisionism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Marx, M., & Stevenson, H. H. (2006). The tools of cooperation and change. Harvard Business Review, 84, 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J., & Porras, J. (1994). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, K. (2002). Organizational complexity. In M. Warner (Ed.), International encyclopedia of business and management (pp. 5013–5022). London: Thompson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E., & Auster, E. (2011). Values, authenticity and responsible leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, J. (1993). A strong poet’s perspective on Richard Rorty. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 12(2–4), 213–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston, MA: Little Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. (2011). Strong Poets. The Ministry of Insights, March 11. http://ministryofinsights.com/2011/03/14/strong-poets/. Accessed May 18, 2011.

  • Harmeling, S. S., Sarasvathy, S. D., & Freeman, R. E. (2009). Related debates in ethics and entrepreneurship: Values, opportunities and contingency. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 341–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Reading, MA: Helix Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackon, K. T. (2005). Toward Authenticity: A Sartrean perspective on business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 58, 307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (2009). How did the economists get it so wrong? New York Times Magazine, 36–43.

  • Lerner, G. (1997). Why history matters: Life and thought. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maak, T., & Pless, N. (2006a). Responsible leadership: A relational approach. In T. Maak & N. Pless (Eds.), Responsible leadership (pp. 33–53). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maak, T., & Pless, N. (2006b). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society—A relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A. D., Gaba, V., & Colwell, K. A. (2005). Organizing far from equilibrium: Nonlinear change in organizational fields. Organization Science, 16(5), 456–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, L. (2006). Permission to steal: Revealing the roots of corporate scandal–An address to my fellow citizens. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley–Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. (2009). Business leadership: Three levels of ethical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 525–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. (1981). Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. (1996). Complexity and creativity in organizations. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, M. (2009). Be the solution: How entrepreneurs and conscious capitalists can solve all the worlds problems. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R., Foster, W., & Trank, C. Q. (2011). Rhetorical history as competitive advantage. Advances in Strategic Management, 27, 147–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F., Zimmerman, B., & Patton, M. Q. (2006). Getting to maybe: How the world is changed. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, M. (1992). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D., & Sillanpää, M. (1997). The stakeholder corporation. London: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, D., & Trosten-Bloom, A. (2003). The power of appreciative inquiry. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Edward Freeman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Auster, E.R., Freeman, R.E. Values and Poetic Organizations: Beyond Value Fit Toward Values Through Conversation. J Bus Ethics 113, 39–49 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1279-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1279-5

Keywords

Navigation