Abstract
This article discusses the implications of moral dissonance for managers, and how dissonance induced self justification can create an amplifying feedback loop and downward spiral of immoral behaviour. After addressing the nature of moral dissonance, including the difference between moral and hedonistic dissonance, the writer then focuses on dissonance reduction strategies available to managers such as rationalization, self affirmation, self justification, etc. It is noted that there is a considerable literature which views the organization as a potentially corrupting institution and a source of acute levels of moral dissonance. A simplified process model linking immoral behaviour, dissonance and rationalization is mooted, and some recent theories which question traditional dissonance models, including the free choice paradigm (FCP), are considered. The writer concludes that in the light of the above mentioned critical theories, it may be assumed that the levels of moral dissonance, and the extent of rationalization/self justification amongst managers, are more a function of personality and situational factors than previously assumed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aronson, E. (1995). The social animal. New York: Freeman.
Aronson, E. (2004). The social animal. New York: Worth.
Bakan, J. (2004). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of power. London: Constable.
Bloom, P. (2005). Descartes’ baby: How child development explains what makes US human. London: Arrow.
Brady, F. N., & Logsdon, J. M. (1988). “Stanford prison experiment” and the relevance for teaching business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 703–710.
Bratton, J., & Gold, J. (2003). Human resource practice: Theory and practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Chen, M. K. (2008). Rationalization and cognitive dissonance: Do choices affect or reflect preferences? Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No.1669. http://cowles.econ.yale.edu/. Accessed 7 June 2010.
Cialdini, R. B. (1996). Social influence and the triple tumor structure of organizational dishonesty. In D. M. Messick & A. E. Brunsel (Eds.), Codes of conduct: Behavioral research into business ethics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Cooper, J. (2007). Cognitive dissonance: Fifty years of a classic theory. London: Sage.
Cruver, B. (2003). Enron: Anatomy of greed. London: Arrow.
Darley, J. M. (1992). Social organization for the production of evil. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 199–218.
Darley, J. M. (1996). How organizations socialize individuals into evildoing. In D. M. Messick & A. E. Brunsel (Eds.), Codes of Conduct: Behavioral research into business ethics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Fast, N. J., Gruenfeld, D. H., Sivanathan, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Illusory control: A generative force behind power’s far reaching effects. Psychological Science, 20, 502–508.
Festinger, L. (1962). Cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hauser, M. D. (2007). Moral minds: How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. London: Little Brown.
Holland, R. W., et al. (2002). Dissonance on the road: Self-esteem as a moderator of internal and external self-justification strategies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1713–1724.
Konovsky, M. A., & Jaster, F. (1989). “Blaming the victim” and other ways business men and women account for questionable behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 391–398.
Messick, D. M., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (Eds.). (1996). Codes of Conduct: Behavioral Research into Business Ethics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Persaud, R.: 2007, Raj Persaud on how cognitive dissonance affects managers. Health Service Journal, 19th November 2007. Accessed 4 April, 2010, from http://www.hsj.co.uk.
Ramachandran, V. S. (1999). Phantoms in the brain. London: Fourth Estate.
Sears, D., et al. (1991). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Sims, R. R. (1992). Linking groupthink to unethical behavior in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 651–652.
Slater, L. (2005). Opening Skinner’s box: Great psychological experiments of the twentieth century. London: Bloomsbury.
Steele, C. M., & Liu, T. J. (1983). Dissonance processes as self-affirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 5–19.
Tavris, C., & Aronson, E. (2008). Mistakes were made (but not by me). London: Pinter & Martin.
Thibodeau, R., & Aronson, E. (1992). Taking a closer look: Reasserting the role of self-concept in dissonance theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 591–602.
Tierney, J. (2008). And behind door no. 1, a fatal flaw. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/08science//08tier.html?ref=science. Accessed 7 June 2010.
Tierney, J. (2010). Monkeys, candy and cognitive dissonance, TierneyLab/New York Times. http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/27monkeys-candy-and-cognitive-dissonance/. Accessed 7 June 2010.
Tompkins, P & J. Lawley. (2009). Cognitive dissonance and creative tension—the same or different? The Clean Collection. http://www.cleanlanguage.co.uk/articles/262/1/Cogntive-Dissonance-and-Creative-Tension/. Accessed 27 May 2010.
Tsang, J. (2002). Moral rationalization and the integration of situational factors and psychological processes in immoral behaviour. Review of General Psychology, 6, 25–50.
Viswesvaran, C., & Deshpande, S. P. (1996). Ethics, success, and job satisfaction: A test of dissonance theory in India. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1056–1069.
Wojciske, B., & Struzynska-Kujalowicz, A. (2007). Power influences self-esteem. Social Cognition, 25, 472–494.
Wright, R. (1996). The moral animal: Why we are the way we are. London: Arrow.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lowell, J. Managers and Moral Dissonance: Self Justification as a Big Threat to Ethical Management?. J Bus Ethics 105, 17–25 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0931-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0931-9