Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility, Investor Behaviors, and Stock Market Returns: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in China

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article studies how financial investors respond to firms’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance in terms of their investing behaviors, and how such behaviors change contingent on an event that provokes their attention and concerns to CSR. Using the melamine contamination incident in China as a natural experiment, it is found that neither the individual investors’ nor the institutional investors’ behaviors are influenced by firms’ CSR performance before the incident. Nevertheless, in the post-event period, institutional investors’ behaviors are significantly influenced by firms’ CSR performance that exceeds a certain threshold. Furthermore, such an effect diminishes for a better CSR performance. In comparison, the authors do not find any effects of CSR performance on individual investors, either before the event or after the event. Finally, firms’ performance and investors’ behaviors jointly affect firms’ stock returns after the event but not before the event. This article reconciles the mixed findings in the literature on the effect of firms’ CSR performance on their financial performance by showing that such an effect exists in a contingent manner. Furthermore, the authors show that a too low or a too high CSR performance could lead to undesirable responses from investors. Therefore, managers should pay attention to optimizing firms’ CSR activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya, V., L. Pedersen. 2005. Asset Pricing with Liquidity Risk. Journal of Financial Economics 77(3). 75-410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R., J. Derwall, R. Otten. 2007. The Ethical Mutual Fund Performance Debate: New Evidence from Canada. Journal of Business Ethics. 70(2). 111-124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R., K. Koedijk, R. Otten. 2005. International Evidence on Ethical Mutual Fund Performance and Investment Style. Journal of Banking & Finance. 29(7). 1751-1767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R., R. Otten, A. T. Rad. 2006. Ethical Investing in Australia: Is There a Financial Penalty? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 14. 33-48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beber, A., M. W. Brandt, K. A. Kavajecz: 2009, ‘What Does Equity Sector Order Flow Tell us About the Economy’, SSRN working paper.

  • Benson, K. L., T. J. Brailsford, J. E. Humphrey. 2006. Do Socially Responsible Fund Managers Really Invest Differently? Journal of Business Ethics. 65(4). 337-357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. Y., T. Ramadorai, A. Schwartz. 2009. Caught on Tape: Institutional Trading, Stock Returns, and Earnings Announcements. Journal of Financial Economics. 92(1). 66-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, L.: 2008, ‘More Firms Tied to Tainted Formula’, Wall Street Journal. September 17, 2008.

  • Chordia, T., R. Roll, A. Subrahmanyam. 2000. Commonality in Liquidity. Journal of Financial Economics. 56(1). 3-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chordia, T., R. Roll, A. Subrahmanyam. 2001. Market Liquidity and Trading Activity. Journal of Finance. 56(2). 501-530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chordia, T., R. Roll, A. Subrahmanyam. 2002. Order Imbalance, Liquidity, and Market Returns. Journal of Financial Economics. 65(1). 111-130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. B. E. 1995. A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review. 20(1). 92-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derwall, J., et al. 2005. The Eco-Efficiency Premium Puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal. 61(2). 51-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., L. E. Preston. 1995. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation - Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review. 20(1). 65-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., K. R. French. 1992. The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Finance. 47(2). 427-465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E., et al. 1969. The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information. International Economic Review. 10. 1-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, S., H. Jo, M. Statman. 1993. Doing Well While Doing Good? The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds. Financial Analysts Journal. 49. 62-66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. P., et al. 2007. Corporate Social Responsibility and Socially Responsible Investing: A Global Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics. 70(2). 165-174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hvidkjaer, S. 2008. Small Trades and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns. Review of Financial Studies. 21(3). 1123-1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., et al. 2008. The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Investment Funds in Australia. Journal of Business Ethics. 80(2). 181-203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, E. P. 2003. A Guide to Econometrics, 5th Edition. blackwell Publishing, Oxford UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., P. Hong, W. van Dolen: 2007, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in China: An Analysis of Domestic and Foreign Retailers’ Sustainability Dimensions’, Business Strategy and the Environment.

  • Kreander, N., et al. 2005. Evaluating the Performance of Ethical and Non-Ethical Funds: A Matched Pair Analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 32(7-8). 1465-1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, L. 2005. Answers to Four Questions. Journal of Investing. 14. 125-139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., B. Radhakrishna. 2000. Inferring Investor Behavior: Evidence from Torq Data Journal of Financial Markets. 3. 83-111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. M. C., M. J. Ready. 1991. Inferring Trade Direction from Intraday Data. Journal of Finance. 46(2). 733-746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X. M., C. B. Bhattacharya. 2009. The Debate over Doing Good: Corporate Social Performance, Strategic Marketing Levers, and Firm-Idiosyncratic Risk. Journal of Marketing. 73(6). 198-213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinlay, A. C. 1997. Event Studies in Economics and Finance. Journal of Economic Literature. 35. 13-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, J. G., H. White. 1985. Some Heteroscedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimators with Improved Finite Sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics. 29. 53-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D., J. P. Walsh. 2003. Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly. 48(2). 268-305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., D. Siegel. 1997. Event Studies in Management Research: Theoretical and Empirical Issues. Academy of Management Journal. 40(3) 626-657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., D. Siegel. 2001. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. The Academy of Management Review. 26(1). 117-127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle, D. J. Wood. 1997. Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review. 22(4). 853-886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pava, M. L., J. Krausz. 1996. The Association between Corporate Social-Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost. Journal of Business Ethics. 15(3). 321-357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peloza, J. 2006. Using Corporate Social Responsibility as Insurance for Financial Performance. California Management Review. 48(2). 52- + .

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., M. R. Kramer. 2002. The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review. 80(12). 56- + .

    Google Scholar 

  • Posnikoff, J. F. 1997. Disinvestment from South Africa: They Did Well by Doing Good. Contemporary Economic Policy. 15(1). 76-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, L., D. O’Bannon. 1997. The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship. Business and Society. 36. 5-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renneboog, L., J. Ter Horst, C. D. Zhang. 2008. Socially Responsible Investments: Institutional Aspects, Performance, and Investor Behavior. Journal of Banking & Finance. 32(9). 1723-1742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, A. 1981. Social-Responsibility and Portfolio Performance. California Management Review. 23(4). 55-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruf, B. M., et al. 2001. An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics. 32(2). 143-156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R., K. Hansen. 1985. It’s a Good Business. Atheneum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J., A. Solomon and S. Norton: 2002, `Socially Responsible Investment in the UK: Drivers and Current Issues', Journal of General Management 27, 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, R., C. J. Cowton. 2004. The Maturing of Socially Responsible Investment: A Review of the Developing Link with Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics. 52(1). 45-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teoh, S. H., I. Welch, C. P. Wazzan. 1999. The Effect of Socially Activist Investment Policies on the Financial Markets: Evidence from the South African Boycott. Journal of Business. 72(1). 35-89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. 2001. Corporate Governance. Econometrica. 69(1). 1-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoutsoura, M.: 2004, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance’, Working Paper Series, Center for Responsible Business, UC Berkeley, http://escholarship.org/uc/item/111799p2.

  • Whetten, D. A., G. Rands and P. O. Godfrey: 2002, `What are the Responsibilities of Business to Society?', in A. Pettigrew, H. Thomas and R. Whittington (eds.), Handbook of Strategy and Management (Sage Publications, London), pp. 373–408

  • Wood, D. J., R. E. Jones. 1995. Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. 3. 229-267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., S. P. Ferris. 1997. Agency Conflict and Corporate Strategy: The Effect of Divestment on Corporate Value. Strategic Management Journal. 18(1). 77-83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maobin Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, M., Qiu, C. & Kong, D. Corporate Social Responsibility, Investor Behaviors, and Stock Market Returns: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in China. J Bus Ethics 101, 127–141 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0713-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0713-9

Keywords

Navigation