Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Critical Reflective Organizations: An Empirical Observation of Global Active Citizenship and Green Politics

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Relationships between the environmental and economic dimensions of sustainability have been solidly specified, but relatively little attention has been given to the social sphere. The current study attempts to fill this gap by integrating corporate environmentalism more fully with concepts of corporate sustainability. This investigation draws specifically from neo-Habermasian critical environmental theory research and brings three concepts together for closer empirical examination: the public sphere, the communicative rationality, and discursive design with the goal of capturing whether critical and reflective organizational systems (CROS) among the selected sample of business participants are in fact developing. Using content analysis on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports, the study reveals that some business organizations appear to be on the brink of developing a type of learning environment consistent with CROS thinking. The empirical findings also suggest that there is a transformative effect on citizenship that can result from the teaching and learning that is facilitated by voluntary CSR initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams C.A., G.R. Frost, G.R (2006) ‘Accessibility and Functionality of the Corporate web site: Implications for Sustainability Reporting’. Business Strategy and the Environment 15:275-287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., Deetz S. (1996) ‘Critical Theory and Postmodern Approaches to Organizational Studies’. In Clegg S.R., Hardy C., Nord W (Eds) Handbook of Organization Studies. Sage, London, 191-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., and H. Willmott: 2003, ‘Introduction. In M. Alvesson & H. Willmott (Eds.), Studying Management Critically: 1-22. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arevalo, J.A., and F.T. Fallon: 2008, ‘Assessing Corporate Responsibility as a Contribution to Global Governance: The Case of the UN Global Compact’. Corporate Governance 8, 456-470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M: 2004, ‘Are Globalization and Sustainability Compatible? Review of the Debate Between the World Business Council for Sustainable Development and the International Forum on Globalization’, Organization & Environment 17, 523-532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhart, M. and A. Slater: 2007, ‘How Sustainable is Your Business?’, Communication World 24(6), 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, E.H., and M. Haire: 1978, ‘Social Impact Disclosure and Corporate Annual Reports’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 1 (1): 11-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, C.M., and W.B. Wilhelm; 2008, ‘Going Beyond Green: The Why and How of Integrating Sustainability into the Marketing Curriculum’, Journal of Marketing Education 30, 33-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz, R.A: 1998, ‘Principles of Environmental Management: The Greening of Business. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burritt, R.L., and S. Welch: 1997, ‘Australian Commonwealth Entities: an Analysis of their Environmental Disclosure’, ABACUS 33 (1): 1-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calas, M. B. and L. Smircich (eds.): 2002, ‘Symposium: On Critical Management Studies’, Organization 9, 363–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetindamar, D. and K. Husoy: 2007, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Environmentally Responsible Behavior: The Case of the United Nations Global Compact’, Journal of Business Ethics 76, 163-176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. J., E. Peirce, L. P. Hartman, W. M. Hoffman and J. Carrier: 2007, ‘Ethics, CSR, and Sustainability Education in the Financial Times Top 50 Global Business Schools: Baseline Data and Future Research Directions’, Journal of Business Ethics 73, 347–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapp, J. and P. Dauvergne: 2005, ‘Paths to a Green World: the Political Economy of the GlobalEenvironment’, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordano, M. and L.H. Frieze: 2000, ‘Pollution Reduction Preferences of U.S. Environmental Managers: Applying Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behavior’, Academy of Management Journal 43, 627-641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coupland, C: 2006, ‘Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility in Web-Based Reports: Currency in the Baking Sector?’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 17, 865-881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, D.H: 2003, ‘Consumer Perception of Corporate Donations: Effects of Company Reputation for Social Responsibility and Type of Donation’, Journal of Advertising 32 (4), 91-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C., Gordon B. (1996) ‘A study of the Environmental Disclosure Policies of Australian Corporations’. Accounting & Business Research 26 (3):187-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierkes M (1979) ‘Corporate Social Reporting in Germany: Conceptual Developments and Practical Experience’. Accounting, Organization and Society 42:87-107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J.S: 1990, ‘Discursive Democracy: Politics,Ppolicy, and Political Science’, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J.S: 1997, ‘The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses’, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R (2004) ‘The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty’, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egri, c.P. and S. Herman: 2000, ‘Leadership in the North American Environmental sector: Values, Leadership, Styles, and Contexts of Environmental Leaders and their Organizations’, Academy of Management Journal 43, 571-604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, M.A: 2004, ‘Corporate Environmentalism, Regulatory Reform, and Industry Self- Regulation: Toward Genuine Regulatory Reinvention in the United States’, Governance 17, 145-167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, S.: 2000, ‘Enforcing the Environment: Regulatory Realities’, Business Strategy and the Environment 9(1), 62–72.

  • Forbes, L.C. and J.M. Jermier: 2002, ‘The Institutionalization of Voluntary Organizational Greening and the Ideals of Environmentalism: Lessons About Official Culture from Symbolic Organization Theory’, In A. Hoffman & M. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, Policy and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives 194-213. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D.L., Dickinson, S.J., and A. Scharl: 2008, ‘Communicating Sustainability: A Web Content analysis of North American, Asian and European Firms’, Journal of Communication Management 12 (3), 243-265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P.J: 2001, ‘Lean and Green: Profit for Your Workplace and the Environment’, San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, C: 2004, ‘Reinventing Business Schools: The Contribution of Critical Management Education’, Academy of Management Learning and Education 3, 178-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N., Kagan, R.A., and D. Thornton: 2003, ‘Shades of Green: Business, Regulation, and Environment’, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J.E., and L.D. Parker: 1990, ‘Corporate Social Disclosure Practice: A Comparative International Analysis’, Advances in Public Interest Accounting 3, 159-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J: 1989, ‘Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere’, Cambridge, MA; MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann R (2007) ‘Is Corporate Citizenship Making a Difference?’. Journal of Corporate Citizenship 28:15-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, P. and M. Tyler: 2004, ‘MOT your life’: Critical Management Studies and the Management of Everyday Life’, Human Relations 57: 619-645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held, D: 1980, ‘Introduction to Critical Theory, Horkheimer to Habermas’, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, W.L: 2009, Global Business Today’, 6th Ed., New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, M.: 2004, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: An Issues Paper’, World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization, International Labor Office.

  • Ingram R.W (1978) ‘An Investigation of the Information Content of Certain Social Responsibility Disclosures’. Journal of Accounting Research 16 (2):270-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jermier, J. M.: 1998, ‘Critical Perspectives on Organizational Control’, Administrative Science Quarterly 43, 235–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jermier, J.M. and L.C. Forbes: 2003, ‘Greening Organizations: Critical Issues’, In M. Alvesson, & H. Willmott (Eds.), Studying Management Critically 157-176, London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jermier, J.M., Forbes, L.C., Benn, S. and R.J. Orsato: 2006, ‘The New Corporate Environmentalism and Green Politics’, In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies 618-650. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampf, K: 2007, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Walmart, Maersk, and the Cultural Bounds of Representation in Corporate Web Sites’, Corporate Communications: An International Journal 12 (1), 41-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, C.S: 2000, ‘Talking Beyond the Rational’, American Review of Public Administration 30, 271-291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A: 2000, ‘Economics of Environmental Management’, Harlow, England: PrenticeHall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A: 2008, ‘Sustainability, Accountability and corporate Governance: ExploringMultinationals’ Reporting Practices’, Business Strategy and the Environment 18, 1-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., and A. Mauser: 2002, ‘The Evolution of Environmental Management: From stage Models to Performance Evaluation’, Business Strategy and the Environment 11, 14-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A; Walhain, S., and S. Wateringen: 2001, ‘Environmental Reporting by the Fortune Global 250: Exploring the Influence of Nationality and Sector’, Business Strategy and the Environment 10, 15-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K: 1980, ‘Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology’, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, T.P. and J.W. Maxwell: 2004, ‘Corporate Environmentalism and Public Policy’, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Minz, J.A: 1995, ‘Enforcement at the E.P.A’, Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness, K.E., and A.M. Mirza: 1991, ‘Corporate Social Disclosure: A Note on a Test of Agency Theory’, British Accounting Review 23, 211-217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J.D: 1993, ‘Distrust of Representation: Habermas on the Public Sphere’, Media, Culture, and Society, 15, 541-571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M, van der Linde C. (1995)’Green and Competitive’, Harvard Business Review 73:120-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, W. J. and D. Levine-Donnerstein: 1999, `Rethinking Validity and Reliability in Content Analysis', Journal of Applied Communication Research 27, 258–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasanen K., Merilaninen S., Lovio R. (1995)’Pioneering Description of Corporate Greening: Notes and Doubts About the Emerging Discussion’, Business strategy and the Environment 3:9-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M.: 2004, `Bottoming Out', CPA Australia. November 16, http://www.cpaaustralia.com/au/cps/rde/xchg/. Accessed 7 June 2008.

  • Rivera, J., M. Delmas: 2004, ‘Business and Environmental Protection’, Human Ecology Review 11, 230-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J.G: 2004, ‘Reconstructing the Global Public Domain – Issues, Actors, and Practices’, European Journal of International Relations, 10, 499-531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, H.: 2005, ‘International Corporate Social Responsibility Rating Systems’, The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 20,107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A.G: 2009, ‘Critical Theory and its Contribution to Critical Management Studies, In M. Alvesson, H. Willmott, and T. Bridman (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press, 29-51..

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S: 2001, ‘Different Strokes: Regulatory Styles and Environmental Strategy in the North American Oil and Gas Industry’, Business Strategy and the Environment 10, 344-364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S: 2002, ‘Research in Corporate Sustainability: What Really Matters?’, In S. Sharma and M. Starik (Eds.), Research in Corporate Sustainability: The Evolving Practice of Organizations in the Natural Environment 1-29. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P: 1996, ‘Greening Business’, Cincinnati, OH: Thompson Executive Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, D: 1997, ‘Self-Regulation versus Command and Control? Beyond False Dichotomies’, Law & Policy 19, 529-559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Therborn, G: 1970, ‘The Frankfurt School’, New Left Review 63, 65-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgerson, D: 2000, ‘Farewell to the Green Movement? Political Action and the Green Public Sphere’, Environmental Politics 9, 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, E. W. K.: 1998, `A Longitudinal Study of Corporate Social Reporting in Singapore: The Case of the Banking, Food and Beverages and Hotel Industries', Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 11, 624–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNGC: 2007, ‘Annual Review – On the Occasion of the 2007 Global Compact Leaders Summit’, Geneva, 5–6 July, www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/news_events/8.1/GCAnnualReview2007.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2007.

  • UNGC: 2009, ‘UN Global Compact – Participants Search Component’, New York, www.unglobalcompact.org. Accessed 15 November 2009.

  • Utting, P. (Ed.) 2002, ‘The Greening of Business in Developing Countries’, London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschoor, C.C: 2006, ‘Consumers Consider the Importance of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Strategic Finance 88 (2), 20-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S: 2008, ‘Building a New Institutional Infrastructure for Corporate Responsibility’, Academy of Management Perspectives 22 (3), 87-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walley, N., and B. Whitehead: 1994, ‘It’s Not Easy Being Green’, Harvard Business Review72, 46-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. P.: 1988, ‘Basic Content Analysis’, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series 07-049 (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).

  • Wheeler, D. and J. Elkington: 2001, `The End of the Corporate Environmental Report? Or the Advent of Cybernetic Sustainability Reporting and Communication', Business Strategy and the Environment 10, 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggerhaus R (1994) ‘The Frankfurt School Its History, Theories and Political Significance’. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LIM College – Where Business Meets Fashion, New York, NY, U.S.A.

    Jorge Alexis Arevalo

Authors
  1. Jorge Alexis Arevalo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Alexis Arevalo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arevalo, J.A. Critical Reflective Organizations: An Empirical Observation of Global Active Citizenship and Green Politics. J Bus Ethics 96, 299–316 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0466-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0466-5

Key words

Search

Navigation