Abstract
At the UN, important projects laying down transnational corporations’ (TNCs) human rights responsibilities have been launched without ever clarifying the relevant theoretical foundations. One of the consequences is that the human rights principles in projects like the 2000 UN Global Compact and the 2003 Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights can be understood in different ways, which should not cause surprise given that their authors come from diverse backgrounds, including economics and public policy. An examination of these projects and the views of their authors reveals that, although they are superficially linked to international human rights law, they go well beyond it and attempt to deal with corporate social responsibility issues in ways that elude neat classification as fitting neatly in either legal or non-legal categories. Too little attention has been paid to how in the course of developing these projects the legal and ethical dimensions have become entwined and how lines have gotten blurred. Meanwhile, there has been recognition that these UN projects have emerged simply as ad hoc responses to practical concerns about the sustainability of globalization. The lack of any foundational theory or normative framework should be addressed; it is time to bring together specialists from different fields concerned with the human rights responsibilities of corporations to see if it is possible to define a coherent overarching theory for these UN projects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amnesty International, Business and Human Rights, http://www.amnesty.org/en/business-and-human-rights.
Asante, S.K.B.: 1989, ‘The concept of the good corporate citizen in international business’, ICSID Review: Foreign Investment Law Journal 4, 1-38.
Backer, L.C.: 2006, ‘Multinational Corporations, Transnational Law: The United Nations’ Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations As a Harbinger of Corporate Social Responsibility in International Law,’ Columbia Human Rights Law Review 37, 287-389.
Baltazar, L.G.: 1998, ‘Government Sanctions and Private Initiatives: Striking a New Balance for U.S. Enforcement of Internationally-recognized Workers’ Rights’, Columbia Human Rights Law Review 29, 687-722.
Chambers, R.: 2005, ‘The Unocal Settlement: Implications for the Developing Law on Corporate Complicity in Human Rights Abuses’, Human Rights Brief 13 , 14-16.
Henkin, L.: 1999, `The Universal Declaration at 50 and the Challenge of Global Markets', Brooklyn Journal of International Law 25, 17–25
Human Rights Watch: 1999, The Enron Corporation: Corporate Complicity in Human Rights Violations (Human Rights Watch, New York).
Kell, G. and D. Levin: 2002, ‘The Evolution of the Global Compact Network: An Historic Experiment in Learning and Action. First Draft 6-2002’, Unpublished Paper.
Kell, G. and D. Levin: 2003, ‘The Global Compact Network: An Historic Experiment in Learning and Action’, Business and Society Review, 108 (2), 151-181.
Kell, G. and J. G. Ruggie: 1999, ‘Global Markets and Social Legitimacy: The Case of the “Global Compact”’, Paper presented at the Conference on Governing the Public Domain Beyond the Era of the Washington Consensus? Redrawing the Line Between the State and the Market (York University, Toronto), http://www.unglobalcompact.org/NewsandEvents/articles_and_papers/global_marketssocial_legitimacy_york_university.html.
Liubicic, R. J.: 1998,’Corporate Codes of Conduct and Product Labeling Schemes: The Limits and Possibilities of Promoting International Labor Rights Through Private Initiatives’, Law and Policy in International Business 30, 111-157.
Meintjes, G..: 2000, `An International Human Rights Perspective on Corporate Codes', in O. F. Williams (ed.), Global Codes of Conduct: An Idea Whose Time Has Come, pp. 83–102
Meyer, W. L. and B. Stefanova: 2001,’Human Rights, the UN Global Compact, and Global Governance’, Cornell International Law Journal 34, 501-521.
OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: 2008, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/56/36/1922428.pdf
Rieff, D.: 1999, ‘The Precarious Triumph of Human Rights’, New York Times Magazine, August 8, 36–41.
Ruggie, J.: 2007, ‘Business and Human Rights: Mapping International Standards of Responsibility and Accountability for Corporate Acts’. UN Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, A/HRC/4/35, 19 February 2007, http://www.business-humanrights.org/Documents/SRSG-report-Human-Rights-Council-19-Feb-2007.pdf.
‘Secretary-General Urges Business Leaders, at “Turning-Point in History” to be “Part of the Solution” in War Against World Poverty’, M2 Presswire, 5 February 2002.
Shamir, R.: 2004, ‘Between Self-Regulation and the Alien Tort Claims Act: On the Contested Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Law and Society Review 38, 635-663.
Statement by the U.S. Delegation to the 61st UN Commission on Human Rights, Item 17: Transnational Corporations: April 20, 2005, http://geneva.usmission.gov/humanrights/2005/0420Item17TNC.htm.
UN Commission on Human Rights: 2003, ‘UN Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights’, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/12/Rev.2, 26 August 2003, http://www.unhchr.ch/huridocda/huridoca.nsf/(Symbol)/E.CN.4.Sub.2.2003.12.Rev.2.En.
UN Center on Transnational Corporations: 1986, Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations, United Nations, New York, September.
UN Center on Transnational Corporations: 1988, Proposed Text of the Draft Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations, U.N. ESCOR, Org. Sess., Provisional Agenda Item 2, at 2, Doc. E/1988/39/Add.1 (1988)
UN Global Compact, The Ten Principles: 2004, http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/TheTenPrinciples/index.html.
Weston, B. H.: 1984, ‘Human Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly 6 (3), 257-283.
Wilson, A. and C. Gribben: 2000, Business Responses to Human Rights, Ashridge Centre for Business and Society, April 2000, 1–30, http://www.ashridge.org.uk/website/IC.nsf/wFARPUB/Business+Responses+To+Human+Rights?OpenDocument.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mayer, A.E. Human Rights as a Dimension of CSR: The Blurred Lines Between Legal and Non-Legal Categories. J Bus Ethics 88 (Suppl 4), 561–577 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0315-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0315-6